Consent

Question 1

Real consent + case

Answer 1

Consent must be real, understood without fraud threats or misdirection
R V Tabussum - no real consent as they believed they were consenting for medical purposes

Question 2

Implied consent + case

Answer 2

Touchings eg crowded places

R V Barnes- Ds conviction was quashed as sorts convictions should only occur when the conduct is extremely grave

Question 3

Consent to Minor injuries + cases

Answer 3

Not a defence unless a recognised exception by the courts
R V Brown - can’t consent to pain for sexual gratification
R V Wilson- V could consent to s47 injuries as the branding was aligned with tattooing

Question 4

Mistaken belief in consent

Answer 4

Where D mistakenly believes they had consent form V for a joke
R V Jones- conviction quashed, consent to horseplay is a defence even if there no actual consent

Question 5

Sports

Answer 5

R V Barnes

Intention infliction of injury = crime

Question 6

Medical

Answer 6

If unconcious family but if essential nkt needed