Consciousness and attention Flashcards
Conscious
Wakefulness or awareness
Defining characteristics of consciousness
Intentionality - directed towards something
Unity - resistant to division
Selectivity - only contains a fraction of the info it could
Transience - content subject to change in/voluntarily
Change detection paradigm - Vogel
Requires participants to identify whether a change occurs in an image of abstract objects. Performance rapidly declined when number in visual store exceeds 4
Sperling partial-report task
Consciousness can hold much more info
Difference is change detection paradigm is a measure of working or ST memory
Partial report-task is a measure or sensory memory, much higher-capacity by shorter-lived
Inattention blindness demonstrations - Carrasco
We are effectively blind to a stimulus change is our attention is diverted elsewhere.
Carrasco shown that when our attention is engaged in a particular object, our conscious experience of it changes - appears clearer to us
Posner - pre-cueing paradigm
Participants must identify some property of a visual target that can appear in one of several spatial locations. Prior to the target’s appearance, attention is diverted in the form of a transient peripheral cute (flash of light) or a central symbol cue (arrowhead). Engage attention
Exogenous
Transient peripheral cue
Endogenous
Central symbolic cue
Attentional blink paradigm
Attentional resources distributed temporally as well as spatially
2 targets are presented in quick succession in a series of distractors, the second target can go completed unnoticed due to attentional resources being take up by the recognition of the first target.
Global Workspace theory, Baars 1988-1998
Theatre metaphor
Working memory competes for access to the conscious spotlight
Unconscious processes are behind the scenes
Once reached level of consioucness - broadcast to several specialised modules
Pre attentive and automatic
Describe perceptual processing that can occur in the absence of attention or prior to attention being distrubuted
Dichotic listening task
Measure of pre attentive processing
Participants listen to 2 septette auditory streams and shadow one of them. Gross physical characteristics of stimuli can be retrieved from unattended stream - cocktail party effect when you become aware of your own name - suggest even semantic content can be processed to some extent
Bottleneck theory of attentional selection
Unattended info is filtered out quite high up in processing stream
Visual search task - Treisman and the feature integration theory
Determining which characteristics of visual stimuli are processed pre attentively.
A single object amongst a set of distractors will immediately capture our attention if it differs in a single visual feature. Does not happen if the target different in terms of a conjunction of 2 or more features
Theory posits that attention is required in order to bind the separate 2 features of an object into a coherent whole
Disorder of attention: neglect
Damage to the parietal lobe, results in patient being unable to attend to the left-side of space, making the patient unaware of things appearing on this side
Disorder of attention: extinction
Mild form of neglect, patients can be aware of stimuli on left but only when not accompanied by a competing stimulus on the right. Semantic info about neglected item still processed
McGurk effect and the rubber hand illusion
Examples of how our mental representation of the world can be altered by the presence of competing sensory info from different modalities.
Delay of formation of representation
In order to achieve multi sensory integration
Information from different modalities can be combined
Compartmentalisation of function, even within a single modality
e.g. vision - colour and motion processed spatially separately. Perception of each of these can be selectively deleted - achromatopsia and akinetopsis.
Neural synchrony
Neurons that represent the same object fire in a synchronous pattern of activity, whereas those that represent different objects do not
Balint’s syndrome
Fail to integrate information as a coherent whole. Fail to see global arrangement of small details and make more conjunction errors, but not intrusion errors in tasks where there have to report the correct combination of colours and letters.
Shows evidence of the classic Stroop effect - on some level, binding is taking place, but lack consciousness access to it