Conformity: Types and explanation Flashcards

1
Q

What did Deutsch and Gerrard develop?

A

a two- process theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did the two - process theory argue?

A

there are two main reasons why people conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why do people like to conform ?

A

based on two central needs:

  • the need to be right
  • the need to be liked
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Normative Social Influence

A

an explanation of conformity that refers to performing behaviour, or supporting an opinion in order to gain acceptance from surrounding peers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an example of normative social influence?

A

dressing like a group of people and saying you like the same things as them with the intention of becoming friends with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do people continue to act in a manner they may not privately agree with?

A

to avoid censure and rejection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Normative Social Influence described as?

A

emotional process rather than cognitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the strengths of Normative Social Influence?

A
  • Research support by Asch

- practical value of NSI explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Asch do?

A

-when given an unambiguous line length test participants wold choose the incorrect answer when the incorrect answer was selected by confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Kelman suggested 3 levels of conformity?

A
  • compliance (shallow)
  • identification (intermediate)
  • internalisation ( deep)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Type: Compliance

A

agreeing with the group but keeping personal opinions.

- results in a temporary change in behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Type: Identification

A

we value membership of a group so we will conform to their behaviour or ideas to be a part of the group even if we don’t fully agree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Type: Internalisation

A

deepest level of conformity, personal opinions genuinely change to match the group
- results in permanent change in belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explanation: Informative Social Influence

A

in situations where the correct behaviour is uncertain, we look to the majority for guidance on how to behave because we want to be correct
- results in internalisation, permanently adopting view of the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explanation: Normative Social Influence

A

in situations when the individual wants to appear normal and be one of the majority, so they are approved not rejected
- results in compliance or a superficial change in behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conformity

A

is a change in a persons behaviour or opinions a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or a group of people

17
Q

What did Asch find when interviewed afterwards?

A

participants said they conformed to avoid rejection by others

18
Q

What did Asch’s findings show?

A

people will show compliant behaviour in order to fit in and be approved by the majority

19
Q

What is a criticism of Asch’s experiment?

A

the task in Asch’s line experiment was unusual and not a task performed in everyday life therefore lacks mundane realism and could be argued that conformity would act differently in real life situations

20
Q

How much did the participant conform in Asch’s study? [%]

A
  • gave the wrong answer 36.8% of the time

- overall conformed 75% of the time

21
Q

What is the practical value of NSI?

A

recent research by Garandeau and Cillessen emphasised the role of NSI in bullying

22
Q

What did Garandeau and Cillessen show?

A

how groups with a low quality offriendship may be may be manipulated by a bully so that victimisation of another child provides the group with a common goal creating pressure on all group members to comply

23
Q

Why is Garandeau and Cillessen’s findings a strength?

A

research illustrates that sometimes the desire for acceptance is so strong It outweighs an individuals moral code which shows NSI assumption is supported

24
Q

What are the strengths on Informational Social Influence ?

A

-supporting evidence for ISI from Jenness

25
What did Jenness do?
- who asked participants to do an ambiguous task first alone, then in groups, then make a second guess alone the number of jellybeans in a jar - there is no obvious correct answer
26
What did Jenness find?
the individuals second guess would move closer to the groups guess demonstrating ISI with women conforming more
27
What is a criticism of Jenness task?
the task was unusual and not like a task performed In day to day like therefore lacks mundane realism and could be argued that conformity would act differently in real like situations
28
What is a limitation of Informative Social Influence?
individual differences
29
What did Asch' study find in terms of ISI?
students were less conformist than other participants
30
What did Perrin and Spencer find?
conducted a study involving science and engineering students and found very little conformity
31
Why is the opposing research for Informative Social Influence?
it shows it fails to account for individual differences
32
What is Informative Social Influence?
an explanation of conformity that can be defined as who has the better information as often people are uncertain about what behaviour is right or wrong in ambiguous situations
33
What is Informational Social Influence described as?
a cognitive process due to the ambiguity of the situation