Conflict Theories Flashcards
Types of Conflict Theories
Cultural Conflict Theory, Group Conflict Theory, Marxist Conflict Perspectives, Socialist Feminism, Left Realism
Main tenets of the Social Conflict Theory
- The economy is the foundation of every human society
- The rest of society known as the superstructure is built off the infrastructure
- The consequences of your relationship to the means of production/relationship with the economy determines your position in the superstructure
- Assumes societies are more divided by conflict than they are integrated by consensus
- Questions the assumption that our laws represent the interests of society as a whole, instead the conflict perspective argues that the social norms and values codified into law are those endorsed by the more powerful or dominant groups in society
Video: Minorettes in Switzerland
In 2009, Protests to build more minorettes in Switzerland by Muslims, there was a referendum: the Gov’t. opposed the building because of the threat that they would bring Shyria law among themselves and threaten Swiss society
Cultural Conflict Theory
(Thorsten Sellin) A theory that attempts to explain certain types of criminal behaviour as resulting from a conflict between the conduct norms of divergent cultural groups
Conduct Norms
cultural rules that govern appropriate conduct, generally agreed upon by members of the social group to whom the behavioural norms apply
In culturally Homogenous societies, conduct norms reflect…
Consensus
In culturally heterogeneous societies, conduct norms reflect…
Conflict. There is conflict between the conduct norms of each group, the more complex a society, the greater the probability of culture conflict
Criminal Norms
The conduct norms of dominant groups will be enacted into criminal law. Therefore, crime is an expression of culture conflict when individuals who act based on the conduct norms of their own cultural group find themselves in violation of the conduct norms that the dominant group enacted into law
Honour Killing
Honour related violence, up to and including murder, is a family-initiated, planned, violent response to the perception that a woman has violated the honour of her family by crossing a boundary of sexual appropriateness
Honour Killings include…
- Almost always involve the killing of a women by a male in her family
- The killer does not usually act alone, with the approval/encouragement of other members of the family
- Suspicion or rumour of an alleged impropriety is usually enough to justify an honour crime
- Most experts insist an essential characteristic is that it is premeditated
- Differs from spousal abuse/femicide in that in honour killings, females and the family is often involved
Stats of Honour Killings
- Most perpetrators are men
- All perpetrators are immigrants
- Average age of victims is 21 years
- 1954-1983: 3 honour killings
- 1999-2012: 12 honour killings
- However, on average, every 6 days a woman in Canada is killed by her intimate partner
Of the 89 police reported spousal homicides in 2011, 76 (over 85%) of victims were women
Group Conflict Theorists
George Vold & Richard Quinney
Group Conflict Theory
A theory that attempts to explain certain types of criminal behaviour as resulting from a conflict between the interests of divergent groups
Group Conflict Theory for Vold:
- Vold focuses on crime as conflict between diverse interest groups
- Sees conflict group theory as an explanation for certain types of criminal behaviours
- He sees society as a collection of groups in a constantly shifting equilibrium of opposing group interests
- Assumes that humans are “group-involved” beings whose lives are oriented toward group associations, groups form when members have common interests that are best furthered through collective action
- Law results from politics and the interest groups that can marshal the greatest number of votes will have the most influence in passing new laws: what ends up in law is not necessarily the most important issues or what people want but what those who are elected want
- The whole process of law making/breaking/enforcing becomes a direct reflection of deep-seated and fundamental conflicts between interest groups and their more general struggles for the control of the police power of the state
Conflict between interest groups is a normal social process and one of the fundamental principles of organized political society
Conflict can lead to Crime in 2 General Ways:
1.) A result of Minority Group Behaviour (the lesser not ethnically but politically/criminally)
- Conflict between the behaviour of minority groups and the legal norms, rules and regulations of the dominant majority which are established in law
- A delinquent gang is a minority group whose interests are in opposition to majority adult values
“Conscientious objectors” refuse compulsory military service during wartime & opt for prison sentences
And 2.) Conflict between competing interest groups
- “A successful revolution” – Political revolution makes criminals of those who previously held power, an unsuccessful revolution makes its leaders into traitors subject to immediate execution
- Strikes may escalate into violence or other offences like property damage
- Crimes may result from jurisdictional disputes
Law is not a naturally occurring phenomenon, they are made by people with specific interests
Limits of Group Conflict Theory
limited to instances where criminal behaviour arises from the conflict between interest groups and does not try to explain other types of criminal acts (narrow scope of explanation)
Group Conflict Theory for Quinney:
- Sellin focused on cultural group conflict, Vold on interest group conflict
- Quinney on ‘segments’ of society or types of ‘social groupings’ (segments are social groupings)
- Saw Criminality as the result of conflict between groups
- The more powerful segments are able to secure and protect their own interests by influencing the formulation, enforcement and administration of the law
- Quinney emphasizes unequal distribution of power, especially as related to the formation of public policy
- Some groups are never able to influence policy
While Vold would view society as existing in a relatively stable equilibrium of opposing group interests where all groups are able to make themselves heard in policy decision making, Quinney argues that only some interest groups are sufficiently powerful to influence policy, because power is unequally distributed due to the “structural arrangements of the political state”
Quinney’s 6 Propositions
- ) Crime is a definition of human conduct that is created by authorized agents in a politically organized society
- ) Criminal definitions describe behaviours that conflict with the interests of the segments of society that have the power to shape public policy
- ) Criminal definitions are applied by the segments of society that have the power to shape the enforcement and administration of criminal law
- ) Behavioural patterns are structured in segmentally organized society in relation to criminal definitions and within this context persons engage in actions that have relative probabilities of being defined as criminal
- ) Conceptions of crime are constructed and diffused in the segments of society by various means of communication
- ) The social reality of crime is constructed by the formulation and application of criminal definitions, the deviance of behavioural patterns related to criminal definitions and the construction of criminal conceptions