Confidentiality Flashcards
Confidentiality
Clients typically expect everything to be confidential
When learn of breach often feel betrayed
Speaks to importance of Informed Consent
Just about all information is confidential
Confidentiality extends beyond verbal exchange to records
What are the Ethical Principles behind Confidentiality?
Primary principles of Autonomy & Fidelity:
- Autonomy—individuals have power to decide who has access to personal information
- Fidelity—implicit and explicit promise not to disclose
Secondary principles are Beneficence and Nonmalficence:
- Indiscretions harm the relationship
- Clients cannot benefit without faith in process
- Particularly children/adolescents
- Breaches may put client at risk
Name 3 codes that discuss that include issue of Confidentiality. What are the commonalities?
ACA Code of Ethics § B Confidentiality, Privileged Communication, and Privacy (Welfel, 2010, p. 110)
APA Ethical Principles § 4.01-4.06 (Welfel, 2010, p. 111-112)
AAMFT Code of Ethics Principle II: Confidentiality
Commonalities:
- Codes establish expectations of confidentiality and exceptions
- May share some information for consultation purposes
Discuss the concept of Consultation as it relates to Confidentiality.
Consult under ethic of beneficence:
- Professional peers understand importance and ethics of confidentiality
- —Consultation with Release
- —One-way consultation
- Minimal information
- —Age, gender, sex, occupation, diagnosis, symptomology, culture, race/ethnicity, etc. all depends on the situation and why consulting
Name 3 codes that discuss that include issue of Consultation. What are the commonalities?
ACA Code of Ethics §§ B.3. Information Shared with Others and B.8. Consultation
APA Ethical Principles §4.06 Consultations
AAMFT Codes of Ethics § 2.6
Commonalities
- May share some information for consultation purposes
- Professionals expected to understand need for confidentiality
- Must limit identifying information
Discuss Supervision as it relates to Confidentiality
Supervisors privy to confidential information of trainees
- Must disclose status as trainee (& under whose license)
- Must disclose that supervisor will review records, ask about file, share information, all for benefit of client
Practitioner is also responsible for actions of employees with access to confidential information
Confidentiality & Intimate Partner/Significant Others
96% of therapists report sharing client information with partners; 70% characterize the disclosure as anonymous
Disclose to reduce stress, help client, gain self-understanding; therapists find disclosure beneficial
Recommendation: explain ethical standards to significant others and seek alternative outlets
Discuss Privileged Communication.
Confidentiality and Privileged Communication are not the same (though often used synonymously)
Privilege belongs to the client, not the professional
Client has privilege to share with you without you sharing with other people
Privilege varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction
Privileged Information in Minnesota
Minnesota Statutes 595.02 Subd. 1 (g)
Licensed Psychologists “shall not, without the consent of the professional’s client, be allowed to disclose any information or opinion based thereon which the professional has acquired in attending the client in a professional capacity…”
Minnesota Statutes 148B.593 (b)
“The confidential relations and communications between [an LPC and LPCC] and a client are placed upon the same basis as those that exist between a licensed psychologist and client.”
alMinnesota Statutes 148B.39
“[An LMFT] cannot be required to disclose any information that the person, employee, or associate may have acquired in renderingmarriageand familytherapy services…”
How is privileged Information demanded in Minnesota?
A subpoena ad testificandum (or subpoena ducei tecum) is issued by the Clerk of Court and serve
-In order to get your notes, information
Subpoenas are issued without legal review
- Lawyers can write subpoena for anything, for anyone
- Send to anyone and everyone with information
- Do not need to respond to it
- Not legally obligated
How should one respond to a subpoena and request for privileged information?
Response:
- Call client: Release or not
- Attend court: defend privilege and do not respond
- –No ethics codes require or expect practitioners not to comply with court orders
- –May choose not to, may be in contempt of court - Judge responds: legal or not; ask you questions and may be candid
- –A judge can compel testimony by court order after legal review that finds the information not privileged
- —May share if asked by judge without violating ethics codes
- **Call MN Board of Psychology and anonymously ask what to do about it
- **APA membership offers 2 hours consultation with lawyer if necessary
What are the 10 Limits to Confidentiality?
- Client Request for Release of Information
- Court Orders
- Client Complaints against Practitioner
- Other Client Litigation
- Limitations by State/Federal Statutes
- Duty to Warn and Protect
- Planning Future Crimes
- Counseling HIV-Positive Clients
- End of Life Issues
- Sexual Exploitation by Previous Therapist
Minnesota State Law mandates some reporting
- –Child Abuse and Neglect
- –Prenatal Exposure to Controlled Substances
- –Abuse of Vulnerable Adults
Name 3 codes that discuss that include issue of Client Request for Release of Information . What are the commonalities?
ACA Code of Ethics § B.5.c Release of Confidential Information (Welfel, 2010, p. 120)
APA Ethical Principles § 4.05 Disclosures (Welfel, 2010, p. 539)
AAMFT Code of Ethics, Principle II: Confidentiality § 2.2
Firmly established by Principle of Autonomy
Allow access to own records unless not in best interest
—Best practice is that client would be able to read the notes.
—Occasionally information that would not be beneficial for them to read.
—Obligation to help client consider implications of release, may want to rescind release; always respond but talk to client first
Client signs a release and directs practitioner with whom to share; practitioner may also request release or a release to/from therapist may be requested by another party, e.g., psychiatrist
Discuss Court Orders
Courts can demand access to records or testimony (as discussed under privileged communication)
If a therpaist as expert witness, no privilege between you and person you assessed for the court, thus the court is your client not the assessee; same with I/O
Different than court-ordered therapy, depending on what is court-ordered may be certain aspects that are required to disclose; client should know what information will be disclosed
No privilege exists when therapist is expert witness or consultant for the court: Client is essentially court, not individual being assessed
Client complaints against practitioner
When suing therapist or bringing forth ethics complaint, client must waive right to confidentiality
—Most jurisdictions require a written consent to waive rights when lodging complaint
(thus allows professional to defend self without violating ethical standards)