Confessions Flashcards
for a self-incriminating statement to be admissible it must be
voluntary
harmless error test
A conviction which resulted from an involuntary confession can still be upheld if there is other overwhelming evidence of guilt
sixth amendement guarantees
right of counsel for criminal proceedings after judicial proceedings have begun
there is no violation of the 6th A right to counsel
BEFORE formal proceedings have begun
A D who has been arrested but not charged
has/doesnt have right to?
thinka bout the amendments
- no 6th A right to counsel
- 5th A right to counsel under Miranda
6th A is offense specific which means that the D can be questions without counsel about other offenses unrelated to the charge for which they are being held
does 6th A waiver require counsel to be waived?
no
in nontrial proceedings, deprivation of counsel under 6thA
in regards to conviction
harmless error rule applies and conviciton can be held
in trial proceedings, deprivation of counsel under 6thA
results in automatic reversal of conviction
what type of proceedings will deprivation of counsel NOT affect outcome
what result/what exception?
nontrial
harmless error
what type of proceedings will deprivation of counsel affect outcome
what result/what exception?
trial proceedings
automatic reversal
failure to give Miranda warning, violates?
does not violate?
5th A right against compelled self-incrimination
6th A right to counsel
when is Miranda warning required
prior to interrogation by police
Miranda warning generally only necessary if
D knows they are being detained by gov’t agent
list (2)
how is it determined if custody exists
- would a reasonable person feel free to terminate interrogation and leave?
- if freedom of movement restricted, is the environment similar to that of a traditional arrest?
waiver of Miranda rights has to be
govt has to show by a preponderance of the evidene that waiver was knowing and voluntary
if D unambigously requests counsel, all questioning must cease until counsel has been provided unless
- D then waives the right to counsel
- D is released from interrogation and 14 days have passed
if D indicates they wish to remain silent and PO re-question about a different crime
fresh Miranda has to be administered
if D indicates they want counsel and PO re-question about a different crime
PO must immediately cease questioning until counsel provided or D initiates questioning again
statements obtained in violation of Miranda
can be used to impeach
cannot be used as evidence of guilt
If PO obtian a confession from a detainee without Miranda and then give Miranda is confession admissible?
subsequent confession will be inadmissible if the series of events was intentional (let the D confess, then give the Miranada warning, then D confesses again)
if not series of events was not intentional and failure to give Miranda warnings was inadvertent, then subsequent valid confession may be admissible
if PO fail to give Miranda warning and during interrogation D gives PO infor that leads to nontestimonal evidence, evidence will be?
- suppresed if failure was purposeful
- admissible if failure was not purposeful