Con Law Lecture 2 Flashcards
definition of procedural due process?
procedures the government must follow when taking away life, liberty, or property
definition of substantive due process
asks: does the government have adequate reason to take away life, liberty or property?
definition of equal protection
whether the government’s different treatment of people is adequately justified (turns on type of discrimination and level of scrutiny)
what are the 2 steps in a procedural due process analysis?
- Has there been a deprivation of life, liberty, or property?
- what procedures are required?
- balance the important interests of the individual, whether additional procedures would increase the accuracy of the fact finding, the government’s interest)
what must be balanced on the second step of a DPC analysis to determine what procedures should apply?
- importance of the interest to the individual
- ability of additional procedures to increase the accuracy of the fact finding and
- the government’s interests
if an individual has not been deprived of life, liberty or property, does the government need to afford the individual due process?
no
which level of scrutiny applies when there has been a challenge to a law dealing with an economic liberty?
rational basis
law upheld if it is rationally related to a legitimate government purpose
what is an economic right?
a right dealing w/ employment, profession, or consumer protection
where does the takings clause come from?
the 5th amendment
what does the takings clause say?
the government may take private property for public use if it provides just compensation
*the taking is for public use if the gov acts w/ a reasonable belief the taking will benefit the public
what does the contracts clause say and who does it apply to?
Says: no state shall impair the obligation of contracts
Applies only to state or local interference w/ existing contracts
what type of scrutiny is applied when state or local interference w/ private contracts happens?
special intermediate scrutiny
- does the legislation substantially impair a party’s rights under an existing contract?
- if so, is the law a reasonably and narrowly tailored means of promoting an important and legitimate public interest?
what type of scrutiny is applied when there is state or local interference with government contracts?
strict scrutiny
*law upheld if it is necessary to achieve a compelling government purpose
is privacy a fundamental right protected under substantive due process?
yes
what does the right to privacy include?
- the right to marry
- the right to procreate
- the right to custody of one’s children
- the right to keep the family together
- the right to control the upbringing of one’s children
- the right to purchase and use contraceptives
- the right to an abortion
- the right to engage in private consensual homosexual activities
- the right to refuse medical treatment
when can states not prohibit abortion?
prior to viability
can states regulated abortion after the fetus is viable?
yes, so long as they do not create an undue burden on the ability to obtain abortions
does the government have a duty to subsidize abortions or to provide abortions in public hospitals?
no
are spousal consent and notification laws relating to abortion constitutional?
no
is there a right to physiance assisted death?
no
is the right to keep and bear arms absolute?
no, just have the right to keep guns in the home for protection. States can regulate who has guns, where guns are sold, and what type of guns people own
has the SC announced a scrutiny standard for the second amendment?
no
has the second amendment (right to bear arms) been incorporated so it applies to state and local governments?
yes
a law preventing people from moving into a state protects the right to ____ and must meet ____ scrutiny
- the right to travel
- strict scrutiny
(Strict scrutiny = upheld if necessary to achieve a compelling government purpose)
is there a fundamental right to international travel?
no
laws that deny some citizens the right to vote must meet what type of scrutiny?
strict scrutiny
law upheld if necessary to achieve a compelling government purpose
are at large elections constitutional?
yes unless there is proof of discriminatory purpose
what type of scrutiny is applies when election district lines are drawn based upon race?
strict scrutiny
law upheld if necessary to achieve a compelling government purpose
counting uncounted votes w/o standards in a presidential election violates what?
equal protection
is there a fundamental right to education?
no
when do you use equal protection analysis?
when the government draws distinctions b/t people
what are the 3 steps in an EPC analysis?
- what is the classification?
- what level of scrutiny should be applied?
- Does this law meet the level of scrutiny?
does the 14th amendment concerning equal protection apply to the fed gov?
no, state and local governments only (equal protection applies to the fed gov through the DPC of the 5th amendment)
In equal protection, what level of scrutiny is used when the government discriminates based on race or national origin?
strict scrutiny
law upheld if necessary to achieve a compelling government interest
what are the 2 ways a racial classification is proven?
- classification exists on the face of the law
2. the law is facially neutral but demonstrates a discriminatory impact and discriminatory intent
what level of scrutiny is applies to a government’s racial classification that benefits a race?
strict scrutiny
law upheld if necessary to achieve a compelling government purpose