Con Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Eleventh Amendment immunity?

A

No federal jurisdiction over any suit for damages against a state by a private citizen. Also no suits in state court alleging state violated federal law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Suits against state officials allowed?

A

Against state officials in their official capacity if seeking injunctive relief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can congress limit state’s immunity?

A

Abrogation of immunity allows congress to remove state’s immunity if:
1. congress must explicitly state its intent to abrogate state immunity AND
2. Congress must be legislating under the 13th, 14th, or 15th amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case and Controversy Requirements

A
  1. Standing
  2. ripeness
  3. mootness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Standing requirements

A
  1. Injury in fact
  2. Causation
  3. redressability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ripeness

A

past injury or threat of real and immediate injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What can congress regulate through the commerce clause

A
  1. uses of the channels of interstate commerce
  2. instrumentalities of interstate commerce
  3. economic activity that substantially affects interstate commerce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is an economic activity for the purposes of the commerce clause?

A

The production, distribution, sale, or buying of goods or services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When can congress use its tax power

A

produces some revenue and does not function as a penalty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the limits on the taxing power?

A
  1. No taxes on exports
  2. taxes must be uniform across the nation
  3. Direct taxes must be apportioned among the states
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The spending power must be used for what?

A

The general welfare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is conditional spending allowed

A
  1. conditions are clearly stated
  2. reasonably related to a federal interest
  3. do not require the states to do anything unconstitutional
  4. not unduly coercive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Anti-Commandeering Principle?

A

Congress may not force states to 1. enact legislation OR
2. perform federal executive duties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Can a state consent to being commandeered?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dormant commerce clause?

A

State’s cannot pass laws that discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When does a state law discriminate against interstate commerce?

A

When it favors instate interests over out of state interests OR if it blocks interstate commerce at its border

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Can a discriminatory state law be upheld?

A

Yes. it will receive strict scrutiny. Therefore, the law will only be upheld if
1. it serves a legitimate state purpose
2. that cannot be achieved through any non discriminatory alternative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What if a law is facially non discriminatory but unduly burdens commerce?

A

Intermediate scrutiny: Pike Balancing test
1. law has a legitimate objective
2. law is rationally related to that interest
3. burdens on commerce are not clearly excessive compared to the local benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Exceptions to the dormant commerce clause?

A

State’s can discriminate against other states if the state itself is a market participant. (I.e. state’s can pass laws that say the state can only buy from in state businesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Can a state impose a tax on interstate commerce?

A

Yes IF
1. it is applied to a person or activity that has a substantial nexus with the state
2. it is fairly apportioned (based on the amount of business connected with the state
3. does not discriminate against interstate commerce
4. fairly related to the services provided by the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Valid excuse doctrine

A

a neutral rule regarding court admin constitutes a valid excuse for a state to refrain from hearing a federal cause of action (Ex. neither P nor D are state resident, actions arising outside the forum’s territory, forum non conveniens, SoL).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Types of preemption

A
  1. Express (Congress expressly says that the federal law preempts state law)
  2. Implied (directly contradicts with state law, state law presents an obstacle to applying the federal law, or if congress intended the law to cover the entire field of law)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Can state’s tax the feds

A

No state taxes on the federal government or any agency or entity so closely connected with the federal government that the two cannot be viewed as separate entities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When will a private actor be considered a state actor?

A

IF the private actor performs a traditionally exclusive government function (e.g. taxing), if the government and private actor are in a symbiotic relationship, if the government has encouraged or facilitated the private action, or if the government is inextricably intertwined in the control of the private entity (state athletic board)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Government and private actor symbiotic relationship

A

both are interdependent, joint participants in a mutually beneficial venture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Procedural due process

A

notice and an opportunity to be heard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

When does a person have a property interest for due process to apply

A

must have an entitlement based on law, regulations, or contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

How to determine what type of due process is required

A

Consider
1. the private interest at stake
2. the risk of erroneous deprivation
3. the government’s interest, including the fiscal and administrative burdens imposed by additional or substitute safeguards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

When is post deprivation due process allowed

A

if the governments interest is so high that it justifies deprivation before a hearing OR if a government official deprives in an unauthorized or unforeseeable way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Substantive due process: implied rights

A
  1. right to marry
  2. right to purchase and use contraceptives
  3. right to have and raise children
  4. right to control a child’s education
  5. right to refuse medical treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Substantive due process

A

protects basic, individual rights

32
Q

What standard of review is applied in fundamental rights cases?

A

Strict scrutiny: Government can only deprive a fundamental right if
1. necessary and narrowly tailored
2. to achieve a compelling government interest

33
Q

What standard of review is applied in non-fundamental rights cases?

A

rational basis
law is presumed valid unless plaintiff shows that the law has no rational relationship to any legitimate government interest

34
Q

Equal Protection

A

no state shall deny any person equal protection under the law. 14th applies to states. 5th to the feds

35
Q

Laws that discriminate based on what, get strict scrutiny RE Equal Protection

A

race, religion, national origin, or lawful alienage

36
Q

What discriminatory laws get intermediate scrutiny?

A

gender and illegitimate birth

37
Q

Intermediate scrutiny for EPC

A

law is presumed invalid
government must prove law is substantially related to an important government interest

38
Q

Equal protection fundamental rights

A
  1. Vote
  2. right to marry, procreate, live as a family
  3. right to the courts
  4. right to access the ballot as a candidate
  5. right to travel to another state
39
Q

Contract clause

A

congress can make no laws that substantially impair an existing contract

40
Q

Contract clause test

A

must substantially impair an existing contract between private parties
1. government must show that the law serves a significant and legitimate purpose
2. and the impairment is reasonable and appropriately tailored to that purpose

41
Q

When can states impair contracts

A
  1. meet social emergencies
  2. achieve goals within the scope of their police powers
42
Q

When can a state impair state contracts

A

same test but heightened scrutiny

43
Q

Ex post facto laws

A

Not allowed!!!!!!!
Occurs when government retroactively
1. criminalizes non criminal conduct
2. aggravates the definition of an existing crime
3. increases punishment for an existing crime
4. alter evidentiary rules to permit a criminal conviction on a lessor amount of evidence

44
Q

Bill of attainder

A

NOT ALLOWED
laws that impose punishment on named individuals without a judicial trial

45
Q

Unconstitutional-Conditions Doctrine

A

prohibits the federal and state governments from conditioning the receipt of a discretionary benefit on the waiver of a constitutional right

46
Q

Physical taking

A

government either takes possession of the property or makes a permanent physical invasion of the property

47
Q

regulatory taking

A
  1. taking that denies a property owner of all economically beneficial or productive use OR
  2. taking that excessively or unforeseeably restricts the property’s use without entirely destroying its value
48
Q

penn central test

A

Used for regulatory takings that restrict property’s use.
Considers
1. the regulation’s effect on the property’s value
2. the owner’s reasonable, investment-backed expectations regarding the use of the property
3. and the character of the government action

49
Q

Conditional Regulatory Taking

A

conditions a government benefit on the owner’s surrender of property rights
Prohibited unless
1. there is an essential nexus between the condition and the state interest and
2. the extent of the condition is roughly proportionate to the impact of the proposed development

50
Q

Free exercise clause

A

prohibits law that discriminate against or excessively interfere with the exercise of religion

51
Q

What must a belief be to be protected under the free exercise clause

A

sincerely held

52
Q

What scrutiny do laws get if they are facially good but incidentally burden religion

A

minimal scrutiny. Law is presumed valid unless plaintiff shows
1. not rationally related
2. to a legitimate government interest
ONLY APPLIES TO STATE LAWS

53
Q

What scrutiny do laws get if they are facially discriminatory to religion

A

Strict scrutiny. presumed invalid. Government must show
1. law is necessary and narrowly tailored
2. to achieve a compelling government interest

54
Q

Hybrid claims

A

combines free exercise with some other fundamental right. STRICT SCRUTINY

55
Q

Individualized assessment case

A

requires the court to assess why a specific person cannot follow a law. STRICT SCRUTINY

56
Q

Can church personnel sue a church for employment discrimination?

A

No, ministerial exception applies

57
Q

Establishment clause

A

prohibits government from establishing a national religion, expressing a preference for religion, or from violating the separation of church and state

58
Q

Freedom of speech, content neutral standard

A

Intermediate scrutiny, presumed invalid unless
1. law serves a significant or substantial government interest
2. the law is narrowly tailored (government interest would be less effective without the law) to burden no more speech than necessary
3. law leaves open ample alternative channels for communication

59
Q

Freedom of speech, content based standard

A

strict scrutiny, presumed invalid unless
1. narrowly tailored (least restrictive means) and necessary
2. to achieve a compelling government interest

60
Q

Total medium ban

A

government completely forbids a particular medium of speech (leafletting or posting signs). Courts are weary because of the total ban on speech

61
Q

Secondary effects doctrine

A

applies intermediate scrutiny to content-based laws that target the secondary effects of expressive activity rather than the activity itself (location of adult bookstores)

62
Q

fighting words

A

words likely to provoke an ordinary person to an immediate violent response. No protection

63
Q

Incitement to crime protected?

A

unprotected if
1. directed at producing imminent lawlessness and
2. is likely to produce such action

64
Q

defamation and true threats protected?

A

NO

65
Q

Obscenity test

A

Miller test
Obscene if
1. average person in the community would find that it appeals to the prurient interests
2. the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct as defined by state law
3. AND the work lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

66
Q

Types of government forums

A

Traditional public
designated public
non public

67
Q

Traditional public forum standard of review

A

typical rules
content based strict
content neutral intermediate

68
Q

designated public forum standard of review

A

typical rules, but a government may restrict or completely prohibit access so long as the restriction is viewpoint neutral

69
Q

Nonpublic forum standard of review

A

Rational basis, but must be viewpoint neutral

70
Q

commercial speech

A

speech that proposes a commercial transaction

71
Q

when will a regulation on commercial speech be upheld?

A
  1. the speech concerns lawful activity and is not misleading
  2. the regulation directly advances a substantial government interest
  3. the regulation is not more extensive than necessary
72
Q

expressive conduct

A

conduct intended to convey a message that is likely to be understood by those who view it

73
Q

when may government regulate expressive conduct

A
  1. law serves a significant or substantial state interest
  2. government’s interest is unrelated to the suppression of free expression
  3. law’s restrictions are no greater than necessary
74
Q

Overbroad

A

a law, as written, will chill or deter speech. Must be substantially over broad to be invalidated

75
Q

vagueness

A

law is invalid if people of common intelligence are forced to guess its meaning

76
Q

Freedom of the press

A

Press has the same speech rights as others and government may not deliberately disadvantage the press

77
Q
A