Comparison of approaches Flashcards
FREE WILL VS DETERMINISM- biological approach
Biological Determinism
Behaviour is controlled by internal biological factors (e.g, genes, hormones, etc).
FREE WILL VS DETERMINISM- behaviourist approach
Environmental Determinism
Behaviour is controlled
by stimulus-response
conditioning
FREE WILL VS DETERMINISM- social learning theory
Determinism (Soft)
Behaviour is controlled by environmental forces. However, humans have personal responsibility and free choice.
FREE WILL VS DETERMINISM- cognitive approach
Determinism (Soft)
Behaviour is controlled by mediational processes; however, humans can choose what information they attend to
FREE WILL VS DETERMINISM- psychodynamic approach
Psychic Determinism
Behaviour is determined by unconscious drives and earty childhood experiences.
FREE WILL VS DETERMINISM- humanist approach
Free Will
Humans control their own environment and are capable of change.
NATURE VS NURTURE- biological approach
Nature
Behaviour is the result of innate biological factors (e.g, genes, hormones, etel
NATURE VS NURTURE-behaviourist approach
Nurture
Human are born as a tabula rasa (blank slate) and behaviour is learned.
NATURE VS NURTURE- social learning theory
Nurture
Behaviour is learnt via classical and optrant conditioning,
NATURE VS NURTURE- cognitive approach
Nature & Nurture
Behaviour is the product of information processing and modified by experience.
NATURE VS NURTURE- psychodynamic approach
Mostly Nature
Behaviour is the product of innate drives, but shaped by carty childhood experiences.
NATURE VS NURTURE- humanist approach
Mostly Nurture
Behaviour is shaped by the environment as humans strive to achieve self-actualisation.
REDUCTIONISM VS HOLISM-biological approach
Biological Reductionism
Behaviour is broken down Into biological structures/ processes
REDUCTIONISM VS HOLISM- behaviourist approach
Environmental Reductionism
Behaviour is broken down
Into simple somulus-response associations
REDUCTIONISM VS HOLISM- social learning theory
This approach shares elemants of both the behaviourist and cognitive approach.
REDUCTIONISM VS HOLISM-cognitive approach
Environmental Reductionism
Behaviour is investigated in terms of isolated varlabies (e.g, capacity of STM).
REDUCTIONISM VS HOLISM- psychodynamic approach
Reductionism & Holism
Behaviour is reduced to innate drives, while taking into account the multiple aspects of human behaviour.
REDUCTIONISM VS HOLSIM- humanist approach
Holism
Focuses on understanding all aspects of human experience and interaction.
IDIOGRAPHIC VS NOMOTHETIC- biological approach
Nomothetic
Creates universal laws, as humans share similar physiologies.
IDIOGRAPHIC VS NOMOTHETIC- behaviourist approach
Nomothetic
Creates universal laws, as behaviour is the result of stimulus-response associations.
NOMOTHETIC VS IDIOGRAPHIC- social learning theory
Nomothetic
Attempts to establish general laws of behaviour (e.g, vicarious reinforcement).
IDIOGRAPHIC VS NOMOTHETIC- cognitive approach
Nomothetic
Attempts to establish general laws of cognitive processing but utlises an idiographic approach with case studies
IDIOGRAPHIC VS NOMOTHETIC- psychodynamic approach
Nomothetic & Idiographic
Attempts to establish general laws in relatice to innate drives. while considering unique experience (during childhood).
IDIOGRAPHIC VS NOMOTHETIC- humanist approach
Idiographic
Focuses on the subjective human experience and makes no attempt to create general laws.