comparison Flashcards
role and powers of the HOC vs HOR similarities
-Legislation: Vote on/amend bills
-Initiate money bills; vote on executive’s budget
-Representation: Main house representing ‘the people’
-elected using single member
constituencies
-Oversight: Initiate removal from office of executive
-Investigate executive in committees
role and powers of the HOC vs HOR differences
-Legislation: HoC dominates legislative process, HoR co-equal with Senate
-HoR can be vetoed by President, (and can override presidential veto), no vetoes in UK
- HoC controlled by executive (majority, whips, timetable), HoR separate, especially with divided gov
-Representation: HoC elected every 5 years, HoR every 2 years
-HoC has more party discipline, so representing constituencies less than HoR.
-Oversight: HoR can only remove executive in case of crime, HoC for any reason
-HoR has power to declare war, in UK that’s
executive power
role and powers of the HOL vs Senate similarities
-Legislation: Vote on/amend bills
-Representation: More long-term focus on the
national interest than the other house
-Oversight: Relatively independent from the
executive
role and powers of the HOL vs Senate
-Legislation: Senate is co-equal to HoR in legislative process, HoL subordinate to HoC
- Senate can filibuster bills, HoL cannot (and HoC only private members bills)
- Senate can vote against money bills, HoL not
-Representation: -HoL not elected (electoral mandate), Senate is
-Oversight: Senate can block executive’s appointments and treaties, HoL can’t
- Senate can remove executive from office
(in case of crime), HoL can’t
- Senate can block president’s legislative agenda, HoL cannot
- Senate can block executive’s budget, HoL cannot
balance of power between both houses similarities
Both have two houses
In both countries a bill has to go through the legislative process in both houses
In both countries both houses can amend bills
In both countries both houses have committees to
hold the executive to account
In both countries one house more focused on
long-term national interest (Senate and HoL), and one on short-term local interest (HoR and HoC)
balamce of power between both houses differences
One dominant house (UK) vs. houses in balance (US)
In UK only HoC can remove the executive from office vs. both having that power in the US
In the UK neither house can block executive’s appointments, in the only the Senate can
analyse the different legislative powers of the uk parl and US congress
Within Congress both houses have co-equal legislative powers, in Parliament the HoC dominates
Congress introduces and passes bills separate from the executive, in Parliament the process is largely controlled by the executive
Within Congress both houses have power to pass money bills, in Parliament only the HoC
The Senate can filibuster any bill, in Parliament only private members bills can be filibustered
Parliament has power to pass bills reforming the constitution on its own, Congress can amend the constitution only jointly with the
states
Congress can override a presidential veto, Parliament cannot change a withheld Royal Assent