Company Decision-making, the Company’s Officers and Shareholders Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the roles of directors and shareholders in a company’s decision-making structure, and what statutory provision primarily governs the directors’ authority?

A

Directors handle the company’s day-to-day management, while shareholders provide financial backing and make certain high-level decisions. Directors’ authority to run the company is specified in Model Article (MA) 3. Shareholders typically vote on broader strategic changes, like altering the articles of association or the company’s name (under special resolutions per sections 21 and 77 of the Companies Act 2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What types of decisions are exclusively reserved for shareholders, and what is the legal impact of these decisions on directors?

A

Decisions reserved solely for shareholders often involve special resolutions, including changing the articles of association or the company’s name. Once shareholders approve these changes, directors must comply and ensure proper documentation with Companies House. Directors have no authority to overturn or ignore these shareholder decisions, as they are binding and must be formally executed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the two categories of shareholder decisions that require their involvement and approval. What is the rationale behind each category?

A

The first category involves decisions shareholders make alone, such as altering foundational company structures like its articles or name, requiring special resolutions (ss 21 and 77 CA 2006). The second category includes decisions that authorize directors to engage in contracts with potential personal gain or significant risk, e.g., when the company buys a director’s property. This approval prevents conflicts of interest and ensures directors act in the company’s best interests, not for personal advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the rules regarding notice, quorum, and conflicts of interest in board meetings, according to Model Articles (MA) and the Companies Act (CA) 2006?

A

According to MA 9, notice of a board meeting must be given to all directors. MA 11 specifies that a quorum of two directors is required for a valid meeting, reducing the risk of unilateral decisions. Under s 177 CA 2006, a director must declare any personal interest in a transaction. Per MA 14, directors with personal interests cannot count in the quorum or vote on resolutions related to their interest, ensuring fair decision-making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Distinguish between an ordinary resolution and a special resolution in terms of voting requirements and applicability. What rule clarifies this distinction?

A

An ordinary resolution requires a simple majority (over 50%) of votes, while a special resolution requires at least 75% of votes to pass at a shareholders’ meeting. These apply to different levels of decisions, with ordinary resolutions for regular business matters and special resolutions for more significant changes (e.g., altering the articles). This distinction is outlined in sections 282 and 283 CA 2006.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does a written resolution process work, and what are the key requirements for passing written resolutions under CA 2006?

A

For private companies, written resolutions allow shareholders to approve proposals without convening a general meeting, under s 288 CA 2006. The board circulates the resolution document, including instructions for agreement and a 28-day lapse date for response. Unlike general meetings, voting power in written resolutions is based on share ownership, requiring over 50% for an ordinary resolution or 75% for a special resolution. This process saves time and is especially beneficial when convening a meeting is impractical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is the 14-day notice period calculated for general meetings, and what adjustments are required if notice is given by post or email?

A

The 14-day notice period includes “clear days,” meaning neither the day of notice receipt nor the meeting day count. For example, if notice is given on March 1, the earliest meeting date is March 16. If sent by post or email, notice is deemed received 48 hours after sending (s 1147(2) CA 2006), so two extra days are added, making the earliest meeting date March 18. This ensures shareholders have adequate time to prepare for the meeting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In what cases might a poll vote be preferred over a show of hands in a shareholders’ general meeting, and who can request a poll vote?

A

A poll vote, where each shareholder’s votes correspond to shares owned, may be called if a show of hands doesn’t reflect shareholder equity, as those with more shares have greater voting power. A poll vote can be requested by the chair, the directors, two or more shareholders, or those representing at least 10% of voting rights (MA 44(2)). Poll votes ensure that shareholders’ voting power aligns with their financial stake, potentially changing outcomes from a show of hands.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Under what conditions can a general meeting be held on short notice, and what are the percentage requirements for private and public companies to consent to this arrangement according to CA 2006?

A

A general meeting can be held on short notice when a company needs a decision made urgently, making the standard 14-day notice period impractical. For short notice to be valid (s 307(5)–(6) CA 2006), a majority in number of shareholders must consent, and they must collectively hold at least 90% of the company’s voting shares for private companies. This threshold increases to 95% for public companies. Once the necessary consent is obtained, the meeting can be held immediately or at a later date, as agreed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can shareholders compel a company to circulate a written resolution, and what specific voting rights threshold is required?

A

Shareholders holding at least 5% of the company’s voting rights can require the company to circulate a written resolution to all eligible shareholders under s 292 CA 2006. The company’s articles of association may reduce this threshold below 5% but cannot increase it beyond 5% (s 292(5) CA 2006). This empowers minority shareholders to propose resolutions without relying on board initiation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What rights do shareholders have to include additional information when requesting a circulated written resolution, and who is responsible for associated costs?

A

Shareholders who request the circulation of a written resolution can include a statement of up to 1,000 words addressing the resolution’s subject (s 292(3) CA 2006). This ensures that their views are shared alongside the resolution. However, these shareholders must bear the costs incurred by the company to distribute the resolution and accompanying statement, as per s 294 CA 2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What steps must directors take when shareholders request a general meeting, and how does the CA 2006 regulate the timing of these steps?

A

When shareholders holding at least 5% of voting rights request a general meeting (s 303 CA 2006), the board must act promptly. Directors have 21 days from receiving the request to issue a meeting notice (s 304(1)(a) CA 2006), and the meeting itself must occur within 28 days of that notice (s 304(1)(b) CA 2006). This process caps the total time from the request to the meeting at seven weeks, preventing directors from unduly delaying shareholder-initiated meetings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the legal requirements for filing resolutions and other documents with Companies House, and what penalties exist for non-compliance?

A

Companies must file all special resolutions and specific ordinary resolutions with Companies House, as mandated by s 29 and s 30 CA 2006, to maintain transparency for third parties. Non-compliance results in fines imposed on both the company and its officers, emphasizing the critical nature of meeting filing deadlines to avoid penalization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are statutory books, where should they be kept, and what are the relevant forms if these records are moved?

A

Statutory books are key internal records, such as the register of members and directors, maintained under CA 2006. They must be stored at the company’s registered office or an approved Single Alternative Inspection Location (SAIL). Changes in record location require notification to Companies House using form AD02 (to SAIL), AD03 (from SAIL), or AD04 (to another registered office).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How long must companies keep board and general meeting minutes, and what specific documents are included in this requirement?

A

Companies must keep board meeting minutes (s 248 CA 2006), general meeting minutes (s 355 CA 2006), and records of any written resolutions for at least ten years at the registered office or SAIL. This extensive record-keeping ensures continuity and compliance, as it provides a formal history of the company’s decision-making processes over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What key roles do solicitors play in advising companies on decision-making compliance with CA 2006, particularly in relation to shareholder and board meetings?

A

Solicitors guide companies in filing resolutions, maintaining statutory registers, and drafting accurate minutes. They ensure clients adhere to CA 2006 requirements, especially regarding documents that must be filed with Companies House, like special resolutions. Non-compliance often incurs fines for both the company and responsible officers, highlighting the importance of legal counsel in corporate governance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the annual accounting and reporting obligations for companies, and what criteria define a “small company” or “micro-entity” under CA 2006?

A

Directors must produce annual accounts and maintain accurate records (s 386 and s 394 CA 2006) that reflect the company’s financial position. A “small company” has a balance sheet under £5.1 million, turnover below £10.2 million, and fewer than 50 employees (s 382 CA 2006), whereas a “micro-entity” has lower thresholds: balance sheet under £316,000, turnover under £632,000, and fewer than 10 employees (s 384A CA 2006). These distinctions impact filing requirements and available reporting exemptions.

18
Q

What are the requirements for filing information with Companies House after a shareholder or board decision, and what forms are involved?

A

Following certain decisions, companies must file specific forms with Companies House to update the Registrar of Companies. For example, forms AP03 and AP04 are used to register human and corporate secretaries, respectively. If these roles change, form TM02 is used for secretary resignations, and changes to their details require forms CH03 or CH04, depending on the type of secretary.

19
Q

What is a Single Alternative Inspection Location (SAIL), and how does it relate to a company’s statutory books?

A

A SAIL is an alternative address where a company may choose to keep its statutory books, such as the register of members and directors. Companies notify Companies House of the SAIL address using form AD02, and any movement of records from or to this address must be reported using forms AD03 and AD04. This flexibility allows easier access for inspection purposes.

20
Q

What are the consequences of failing to keep accurate statutory books, and where must these be stored?

A

Failing to keep accurate and complete statutory books, including the register of members and minutes of meetings, is a criminal offense under CA 2006. Companies must store these records at their registered office or SAIL and maintain them for at least ten years. Non-compliance can result in fines for the company and its officers.

21
Q

What filing requirements must companies meet regarding board minutes and resolutions, and what is the significance of the ten-year retention period?

A

Companies must keep minutes of every board and general meeting, as well as records of any written resolutions, for at least ten years (s 248 and s 355 CA 2006). This long-term retention supports accountability and allows for historical reference in legal, financial, or administrative matters.

22
Q

What is a shareholders’ agreement, and how does it differ from the articles of association in terms of binding effect and privacy?

A

A shareholders’ agreement is a private contract binding only those shareholders who sign it, as opposed to the articles, which bind all current and future shareholders. This agreement can provide minority protections and include clauses not visible to the public, unlike the articles, which are filed with Companies House.

23
Q

What types of provisions are typically included in a shareholders’ agreement, and why might shareholders choose this route?

A

Common provisions in shareholders’ agreements include share transfer restrictions, non-compete clauses, and Bushell v Faith clauses (weighted voting rights). These agreements allow for privacy, protect minority shareholders, and help ensure certain terms are only changed with unanimous consent among signing parties.

24
Q

What are the voting rights of shareholders at general meetings, and what additional rights do they have in terms of participation and requisitions?

A

Shareholders can vote by show of hands (one vote per shareholder) and send a proxy to vote on their behalf. They have the right to requisition a general meeting, request a poll vote, receive notice of meetings, and apply to the court to call a meeting if necessary (s 306 CA 2006). Shareholders holding 5% or more of voting rights can also circulate written statements or resolutions.

25
Q

What rights do shareholders have regarding dividends and applying for company winding up, and under what conditions can these rights be exercised?

A

Shareholders have the right to receive dividends if there are available profits and the board recommends them (s 830 CA 2006). They can also apply for a court order to wind up the company if it is “just and equitable” to do so, such as in cases of management deadlock (s 122(g) Insolvency Act 1986).

26
Q

What are shareholders’ inspection rights concerning company records, and which specific documents are included?

A

Shareholders can inspect, free of charge, the minutes of general meetings, all shareholder resolutions, the statutory registers, directors’ service contracts, directors’ indemnities, and contracts related to the company’s share purchases. These rights ensure transparency and accountability within the company.

27
Q

What is the purpose of the PSC (Persons with Significant Control) register, and who must be included on it?

A

The PSC register lists individuals or entities with significant control (usually over 25% of shares or voting rights) to increase transparency. This allows third parties to see who holds influential control within the company, and it must be kept updated and available for inspection.

28
Q

How does the CA 2006 define corporate shareholders, and what rights do they have in terms of representation at meetings?

A

Corporate shareholders are companies that own shares in another company and can authorize a representative to act on their behalf at meetings, as allowed under s 323 CA 2006. This representative has the authority to vote and participate in company meetings, reflecting the interests of the corporate shareholder.

29
Q

Under CA 2006, what defines a “subsidiary” and a “wholly-owned subsidiary” in relation to a holding company?

A

A company is a subsidiary if another company holds a majority of its voting rights, appoints or removes a majority of its board, or has a controlling interest through agreements. It’s “wholly-owned” if the holding company is its sole member, directly or through other subsidiaries (s 1159 CA 2006).

30
Q

What are the specific legal requirements for single-member companies regarding the register of members, and what constitutes a breach of these requirements?

A

Single-member companies must clearly indicate this status on the register of members (s 123 CA 2006). If additional shareholders join, a note must be added stating the date the company ceased to be single-member. Failure to comply is a criminal offense.

31
Q

What are ordinary shares, and what specific rights and obligations do ordinary shareholders typically have?

A

Ordinary shares are the most common type of share, granting shareholders rights to attend and vote at general meetings, with each share typically entitling the holder to one vote. Ordinary shareholders may receive dividends if profits allow and if the board recommends it. Dividends vary based on company profits, and these shareholders are often last in line to receive assets if the company is liquidated.

32
Q

Explain the concept of “classes” of ordinary shares, such as ordinary A and B shares, and the purpose behind creating these classes.

A

Companies can create different classes of ordinary shares (e.g., ordinary A and B) to vary rights among shareholders, particularly for dividend distributions. For example, one class may receive dividends, while another does not. This classification, governed by the articles of association, allows the company flexibility in shareholder treatment based on investment or role, while ensuring that each class of shares is still considered “ordinary.”

33
Q

What are preference shares, and how do they prioritize dividends compared to ordinary shares?

A

Preference shares provide shareholders a priority claim to dividends, which are often fixed and paid out before any dividends to ordinary shareholders. The dividend rate is typically a percentage of the nominal value (e.g., 5% on £1 shares equals a 5p dividend per share). While preference shareholders generally lack voting rights, their dividend priority makes these shares appealing to investors focused on income stability over control.

34
Q

What is the difference between cumulative and non-cumulative preference shares, and why is this distinction important?

A

Cumulative preference shares entitle shareholders to unpaid dividends from previous years if future profits are sufficient, prioritizing these “back dividends” over current dividends for ordinary shareholders. Non-cumulative preference shares, however, forfeit unpaid dividends if they are not issued in a given year. This feature influences investor decisions based on risk tolerance for stable returns.

35
Q

Describe the additional rights participating preference shares may offer and the circumstances under which they apply.

A

Participating preference shares grant shareholders extra dividends or asset shares if the company achieves high profits. For example, participating shareholders may receive a bonus dividend if ordinary shareholders get more than a specified dividend amount. This added right allows preference shareholders to benefit further when the company is highly profitable, making these shares appealing for investors seeking both stability and potential growth.

36
Q

Why are protections for minority shareholders necessary, and what mechanisms are available to address their concerns?

A

Minority shareholders lack sufficient voting power to influence decisions directly, which can leave them vulnerable to actions by majority shareholders or directors that may harm their interests. Legal mechanisms like unfair prejudice petitions (s 994 CA 2006) and derivative claims offer avenues for redress if they face unjust treatment or feel the company’s affairs are managed in a way that unfairly disregards their rights.

37
Q

What constitutes an unfair prejudice petition, and what types of actions might lead a shareholder to file one under s 994 CA 2006?

A

An unfair prejudice petition allows shareholders to seek court remedies if they believe the company’s actions are detrimental to their interests. Common grounds include diverting business opportunities to competing ventures, awarding excessive director pay, or excluding a shareholder from management when involvement was initially promised. These actions harm shareholder interests and can be seen as breaches of fair conduct.

38
Q

What remedies can a court provide in an unfair prejudice action, and what is the most common outcome?

A

The court can order other shareholders to purchase the shares of the prejudiced shareholder or require the company to buy them back. This remedy effectively allows the aggrieved shareholder to exit the company, resolving conflicts and allowing them to recoup their investment. Other potential remedies include restricting changes to the articles or allowing a derivative claim if the issue relates to director misconduct.

39
Q

What is the purpose of a derivative claim, and under what conditions may a shareholder bring one?

A

A derivative claim allows shareholders to pursue legal action on behalf of the company if directors fail to address wrongdoing. It applies to cases of director negligence, breach of duty, or breach of trust. The claim enables shareholders to seek justice for the company when the board’s inaction would otherwise leave misconduct unaddressed, though the claim is filed in the company’s name, not the individual’s.

40
Q

What initial procedural step must shareholders complete to pursue a derivative claim, and how does the court screen these applications?

A

Shareholders must first apply to the court for permission to proceed with a derivative claim. The court reviews the application to ensure there is a prima facie case, filtering out weak or spurious claims. This initial step is crucial, as it protects the company from potential abuse of the legal system by disgruntled shareholders who might misuse the claim process for personal grievances.

41
Q

Under s 263(2) CA 2006, when must the court refuse permission for a derivative claim, and what considerations influence this decision?

A

The court must refuse permission if: (1) a reasonable director would not pursue the claim, (2) the alleged misconduct was authorized or subsequently ratified, or (3) continuing the claim does not promote the company’s success. These factors ensure claims align with the company’s interests, discouraging claims primarily driven by personal motives rather than corporate welfare.