Community Property Flashcards
Basic Presumptions of CP
CA is a CP state. Property acquired during marriage is presumptively CP. Property acquired before, during separation, or after dissolution of marriage, and property acquired by gift, will, or inheritance is presumptively SP
i. Quasi-CP (QCP) is property acquired by either spouse that would have been CP had the spouse been domiciled in California at the time of acquisition; it is treated like CP
Marital Economic Community
Legal “community” of married people. CP may be acquired only during this time. Ends at death, or date of separation (a spouse expresses intent to end marriage + conduct is consistent with intent)
Married Woman’s Special Presumption
If property taken in wife’s name alone before 1/1/1975, presume SP (as gift)
i. EXCEPTION: Intent other than a gift is shown or where the wife controlled how title was taken
Prerequisite to CP
Valid marriage? Legal capacity, over 18 + performance of legal procedures
i. If a couple followed the rules in another state, the marriage will be recognized in CA as valid marriage
Alternatives to Marriage (3)
- Putative spouses: Either or both parties believed in good faith that the marriage was valid
a. Quasi-marital property (QMP) can be divided. QMP is property that would have been CP or QCP had the union been a valid marriage - Marvin action: Unmarried cohabitants can contract with each other to hold property as CP. K upheld as long as consideration does not violate public policy, e.g., no exchange of sexual services
- Marriage by estoppel: If one induces another into marriage knowing the marriage was invalid, inducing party would be estopped from claiming it was not a marriage; CP protections can attach
Duties of Managing Spouse
Each spouse has exclusive management of own SP and equal management of all CP
i. Fiduciary duty of trust and confidence
ii. Deliberate, grossly negligent, or reckless dissipation or destruction of property is actionable (w/in 3 years)
iii. Duty to secure written consent for disposing of CP (non-consenting spouse can ratify or revoke)
Characterization of Property
depends on 1) source of asset, 2) presumptions, 3) parties’ actions
Source of Community Property
Purchased CP
Character of purchase funds is character of the asset.
i. Tracing: For commingled property (presumed CP), proponent of SP has burden of proving what is SP
1. Direct tracing: Proponent of SP attempts to identify with sufficiently accurate records
2. Exhaustion method: Show that at the time the asset was purchased, the community expenses exceeded the community funds. Funds used to purchase with is necessarily SP
3. If tracing not done/possible: Entire asset will be treated as CP, unless the community portion is considerably small in comparison to the amount of SP funds contributed (if CP «_space;SP → then SP)
ii. When real property is being paid for with SP and CP funds (e.g., spouse acquires property before marriage, and CP funds are used to make mortgage payments), community and separate interests are determined by apportioning the property value by the respective contributions proportionally (In re Marriage of Moore)
Presumptions
i. Property acquired during marriage
ii. Anything received in exchange for labor performed during marriage (e.g., wages, artistic work, copyright)
iii. Commingled funds (e.g., in one bank account) or commingled property (acquired with commingled funds)
iv. May rebut CP presumptions by showing SP source (tracing), SP character of asset (gift, etc.), or agreement
v. Assets in joint title. Divorce pre-1987: Property acquired by married couple in any joint title (JT, TIC) is presumed CP. No SP reimbursement under Lucas, unless evidence of title (written agreement or statement)
1. Anti-Lucas statute: In divorce situations, property purchased in joint title from 1987 still presumed CP (rebut w/ writing) but SP is entitled to reimbursement (FMV at purchase) for contribution
2. At death: Under Lucas, SP used to acquire the asset presumed gift, no SP reimb. unless agreed
vi. Title in SP alone does not necessarily control ownership (e.g., funds held in an account in one spouse’s name could still be CP if wages were earned during marriage or without transmutation or evidence of gift)
1. Rebut CP presumption by showing both spouses knowingly took title in form other than CP
vii. Presumption that a property is CP rebuttable with tracing back to SP funds or transmutation to SP
PARTIES’ ACTIONS TO CHANGE CHARACTER
a. Premarital agreement (PMA): Agreeing before marriage character of a spouse’s earnings (typically what will be SP)
i. Starting 1985, statute of frauds: PMA must be in writing, but oral PMA is enforceable if fully executed or detrimental reliance by promisee. 1986–2002: PMA must be voluntary. Starting 2002: It shall be deemed that PMA was not executed voluntarily unless the party against whom enforcement is sought: 1) had independent counsel or waived counsel in writing, 2) had at least 7 days to review the PMA, and 3) was fully advised in writing of all the rights and obligations that attach to PMA
b. Transmutation: Agreeing during marriage to change the character of a particular asset
i. Starting 1985: Any transmutation must be in writing, expressly declare a change in the ownership of property, and be consented to by the spouse whose interest is adversely affected, UNLESS…
1. Insubstantial value: Gift of tangible property between spouses 1) for personal use of recipient spouse + 2) not of substantial value (as measured against the lifestyle of the parties)
2. Intent: Recipient spouse can otherwise offer proof of intent that the gift be SP
SITUATIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ASSETS (five)
a. Personal injury award against third-party tortfeasor
b. SP business
c. Business goodwill earned during marriage is CP.
d. Credit acquisition
e. Marital home
Personal injury award against third-party tortfeasor
CP if the cause of action arose during the marriage
i. At divorce, payments are treated as SP, unless economic hardship to other spouse or comingled
ii. If recovered against other spouse tortfeasor: always SP of injured spouse
SP Business Valuation
If community labor (either spouse) improves value of a SP business, CP can share in increased value
i. Pereira accounting method (reas rate of return) where improvement is from labor or special skills of spouse
1. Original SP investment + reas rate (10%) per year to owner spouse is SP. Rest is CP (½ to owner)
ii. Van Camp accounting method where improvement is from market forces or unique character of business
1. Reasonable salary compensation – community expenses paid from business earnings = CP
2. Remainder of the business = owner’s SP
Business Goodwill Earned During Marriage Valuation
Valuation methods:
i. Market sales valuation: Price the goodwill would command in a sale of the business
ii. Capitalization of past excess earnings: Does not contemplate a sale. Ascertains the present value of the future stream of income that the goodwill developed during the marriage will generate in the business
Credit Acquisition
Presumptively CP when credit or purchase money loans used to purchase property, UNLESS…
i. Lender’s intent test: Creditor relied primarily on SP when extending credit. If there is SP collateral to repay loan, asset likely SP. If lender looks at any CP asset, including credit or earnings of either party, asset is CP