Community and family Flashcards
Parental behaviour varies according to location, culture, context, SES, etc… Parents can be viewed as
Customers (in the competitive market model)
Citizens (in governance or accountability)
Clients
First educators (parents closest)
Partners (implies some equality)
Woods (1995): consumer-citizens
Bastiani (1993) proposes that the basis for home-school partnerships is
Sharing of power, responsibility, ownership
Mutuality: listening, dialogue, compromise
Shared goals
Joint action
Martin et al. (1999) highlight two types of focus for schools
Inward: community enriches the educational experience, parents help students make progress, but school is source of value
Outward: reaching out to serve the needs of the community, education to empower, school boundaries are permeable
Families can be involved in schools in a variety of ways
individual (parents) vs collective (group of families)
Focused on either the:
particular (relating to one child) OR general (relating to whole school, policies, goals)
Critique of Rose (2003) who assumes that leadership of schools MUST be shared with parents and the community (distributed leadership)
Model doesn’t hold water, money is power, this is the driving force behind many private schools, too idealized to work properly as it should, and it would only work in certain cultures with low PD
Learning communities can achieve much according to Furman (2002)
A sense of belonging to remedy alienation
Better academic achievement
Teaching students how to live and get a long with others in a modern democratic society
Ranson (1990): two ways of viewing school and parents
All stems from the organisation’s attitude towards people/learning (LINK back to purpose of learning, Hard HRM vs Soft)
relationships for utilitarian exchange only, parents as customers
OR
people and relationships valued in themselves, communal perspective
Bastiani’s (2002) work in Tower Hamlets leading to a practical framework:
establishing key values through policy creation
support children’s learning at home
support parents’ learning and development
treat parents as partners
take advantage of context/culture
Martin et al.’s (1999) framework for analyzing school’s orientation to families and communities
Values (what is motivating the relationship?)
Purposes (what is the goal of the initiative?)
Tasks (what are the specific things being done?)
Conditions (are the conditions suitable for success?)
Cox and Peterson (2011) on partnerships
Effective partnerships between families ands schools lead to increased academic achievement
Martin et al.’s (1999) description of effective partnerships
Valuing people as citizens Recognize social and academic goals Inclusiveness Build aspiration through achievement Structures for shared decision making
Bray’s (2000) matrix
Pseudo participants to genuine partnership