Combo chemistry Flashcards

1
Q

Combinatorial chemistry

A
  • Original meaning- Production of large numbers of compounds in the form of mixtures or combinations
  • The sets of compounds produced from an automated synthetic run are known as compound libraries
  • Look for a hit- if not then you can discard all of those compounds
  • Only workes in certain biological assays
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Combinatorial chemistry

A
  • Current meaning- any form of high-throughput or automated synthesis
  • E.g. parallel synthesis, matrix synthesis
  • Generally, meany discrete compounds (only one compound per reaction vessel)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mixtures or discrete compounds

A
  • The early work produced mixture libraries =>
  • Useful only if the bio-assay can cope with mixtures of compounds
  • Can an individual compound in a mixture be present at a high enough concentration to exert its biological effect
  • If a mixture proves to be active, can you figure out which compound(s) in the mixture is (are) active
  • These days libraries of discrete compounds are preferred
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The products could be made

A
  • Individually in parallel
  • In mixtures
  • Using either automated solutions or solid phase techniques
  • Whatever the technique used the common denominator is the productivity has been amplified beyond the levels that have been routine for the last 100 years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Before the 1980’s

A
  • Rate of synthesis of compounds= rate of testing of compounds
  • It took about 10,000-15,000 new compounds synthesised and tested before a drug was found
  • A medicinal chemist would commonly prepare about 50 compounds per year for testing
  • Thus 1 drug= 300 chemists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

During 80s

A
  • Automation was introduced into biological screening
  • Suddenly, 50 compounds per year from chemist was not enough
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

History- other driving factors

A
  • Generics =>
  • Price restraints =>
  • Increasing R&D costs =>
  • All need to increase productivity
    • Make and test compounds faster and cheaper
    • Reduce project cost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

During 1990’s

A
  • Automation was introduced into chemical synthesis
  • Driven by pragmatism (forget high purity criteria)
  • Facilitated by solid phase chemistry- breakthrough chemistry- chromatography
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Libary design- negative sense

A
  • Lipinski’s rule of 5
  • Designing out bad compounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Problems with success

A
  • 10,000 compounds per day tested in 50 screens
    • 500,000 new data points per day
  • They had a data overload with a lot of it not being useful
  • Too many compounds which could be made even with advanced robotics
  • Data handling bottleneck
  • Large numbers of active compounds not possessing drug-like properties
  • Make fewer better compounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why do compounds fail in development

A
  • Poor biopharmaceutical properties- 41%
  • Lack of efficacy- 31%
  • Toxicity- 22%
  • Market reasons- 6%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fail fast, fail cheaply

A
  • ADME screens
  • Toxicity
    • These are physical screens
    • Compound is required
    • Time-consuming
    • Resource-intensive
      • Great interest in computation of molecular and biological properties and drug-likness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lipinski rule of 5

A
  • Compounds with 2 or more of the following characteristics are flagged as being likely to have poor oral bioavailability
    • More than 5 H-bond donors
    • MW >500
    • LogP >5
    • H-bond acceptors >10
    • Here O and N => H-bond acceptors
    • N-H and O-H => H-bond donors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rule of 5- easily done

Computerised filter

A
  • Select out those compounds which violate Lipinski rule of 5
  • Other computer-based property estimations may be included
  • E.g. LD50 >100mg/Kg
  • Ames mutagenicity probability <0.9 (remove polycyclic and activated aromatics)
  • Rotatable bonds less than ~8
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Libary design- In a positive sense

A
  • You can use your chemical knowledge to design a chemical synthesis using a range of commercially available building blocks
  • Some of the compounds produced will have similar properties, some will be quite different
  • Which compound should be included in your library of compounds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Combinational library design

A
  • Virtual combinatorial libraries are collections of compounds that could be synthesised from a set of available reactants
    • These libraries can reach sizes too large to synthesise
    • Diversity techniques may be used to select which members will be actually synthesised
    • The purpose for which the library is being assembled and nature of the chemistries required will determine the strategy to implement
    • The library may be
      • Diverse
      • Focussed
      • Complementary to an existing library
17
Q

Which compounds should be included in your library of compounds

A
  • That depends upon what the library is for: lead discovery or lead optimisation
  • Whatever the use will need to make a selection of compounds
  • How should the compounds be chosen
18
Q

What is the purpose of the compound library

A
19
Q

What is the purpose of the compound libary

A
  • Lead discovery- the compound library should be highly diverse
  • Lead optimisations- the compound library should have constrained (Targeted) diversity
  • The actual situation will depend upon the information available at the time and is likely to be somewhere between the two extremes
  • The degree of diversity required is inversely related to the quantity of knowledge known about the targets for which those libraries are designed
20
Q

Using the concept of pharmacophores to make compound choices

A
  • The term pharmacophore is used to describe the types of atoms and their geometric arrangements which are common across an active set of molecules
  • Pharmacophore => the minimum 3D geometrical arrangement of functional groups necessary for activity
    • Usually, there are only 3 or 4 atoms involved in a pharmacophore, forming hydrogen bonds or other similar, energetically favourable interactions with the receptor
    • Peptide is not usually worth considering in pharmacophore identification studies because of the multitude of H-bonds
21
Q

Using the concept of pharmacophores to make compound choices

A
22
Q

What is the purpose of the compound library

A
  • Lead discovery=> the library of compounds should contain as many pharmacophores as possible
  • Typical pharmacophore-based diversity analysis: to include a compound there must be less than
    • 8 rotatable bonds (when a flexible molecule binds to a protein to form a bimolecular complex, it will have a larger entropic penalty to pay than a less flexible molecule because of the reduction in conformational degrees of freedom)
    • 10,000 pharmacophores
    • 10% overlap with pharmacophores from previously included compounds
23
Q

Diverse library selection

A
  • Large initial compound set = Diverse selection=> Smaller representative set
24
Q

What is the purpose of the compound library

Lead optimisation

A
  • Most compounds should contain at least the pharmacophore which is though to be necessary for activity
  • This assumes that all active compounds act at the same site in the same manner
  • If an active pharmacophore exists for the active compounds then it must be one of a subset of pharmacophores which is common across all the active compounds
  • Next slide for using this information to search out compounds similar to the active set
25
Q

Process of pharmacophore searching

A
  • Active compound set (lead compounds) =>
  • Generate all possible pharmacophores and select those common across the active set =>
  • Use the common pharmacophores to search for other possible active compounds in other database=>
  • Synthesise and test these