Colorectal, Anal, and Peritoneal Malignancy Flashcards
What is the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III colon cancer?
What about in stage II disease?
12 months of adjuvant 5-FU and LV confers a 30% absolute reduction in 5-year mortality. The addition of Oxaliplatin to either Capecitabine or 5-FU and LV increases this reduction in mortality by an additional 5%.
In patients with high-risk stage II disease, chemotherapy may confer an absolute 5-year survival advantage of 10%.
What benefit does the addition of Oxaliplatin confer in “high-risk” stage II colon cancer?
None. Single agent therapy with 5-FU or Capecitabine should be used.
What is the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer?
Chemotherapy reduces local recurrence in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer but has not been shown to reduce subsequent metastatic disease or improve overall survival.
What is Capecitabine?
Orally administered Capecitabine, is a fluoropyrimidine designed to mimic continuous infusion of 5-FU but with preferential action at the cancer site.
It has been shown to be as effective as 5-FU with LV but was associated with a lower incidence of neutropenia fever and sepsis.
Which trial supports the use of Oxaliplatin in addition to 5-FU/LV or Capecitabine?
The MOSAIC trial (2004 NEJM): “Adding oxaliplatin to a regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin improves the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.”
Ballpark 5-10% absolute reduction in 3-year mortality. Moreso for stage III.
Which stage II colon cancer patients are considered “high-risk”?
What adjuvant therapy should they be offered and what survival advantage can they anticipate?
- T4 primary
- Obstruction or perforation
- Poorly differentiated histology
- LVI or PNI
- MSI
Single agent adjuvant chemotherapy; 5-FU or Capecitabine, NOT OXALIPLATIN! (no benefit). USA National Cancer Database studies suggest a 10% survival advantage.
Summarise the evidence base around neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer.
Describe the two underlying seminal trials from the last 3 years.
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has no clear advantage over adjuvant chemotherapy and over-treatment is a barrier to large-scale adoption.
PRODIGE-22 (Ann. Surg. 2020): “Perioperative FOLFOX for locally advanced resectable CC is feasible with an acceptable tolerability but is not associated with an increased major pathological response rate as expected. However, perioperative FOLFOX induces pathological regression and downstaging. Better preoperative staging tools are needed to decrease the risk of over-treating patients.”
FOXTROT (Ann. Onc. abstr 2019): “Six weeks NAC for operable primary colon cancer can be delivered safely, with improved perioperative morbidity and marked pathological downstaging including some pCRs. There is a trend toward better disease control at 2 years.”
Why have the NCCN recommended that patients with stage II rectal cancer be treated in a similar fashion to those with stage III rectal cancer?
Unlike colon cancer, where patients are pre-operatively over-staged, retrospective studies out of MSKCC and MDACC have shown that 22% of patients with rectal cancer staged pre-operatively as stage II actually have positive nodes at time of TME.
What did the 2012 Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial show regarding Short versus Long Course?
Three-year local recurrence rates between short-course and long course were not statistically significantly different; the CI for the difference is consistent with either no clinically important difference or differences in favor of LC.
LC may be more effective in reducing LR for distal tumors. No differences in rates of distant recurrence, relapse-free survival, overall survival, or late toxicity were detected.
Summarise the historical basis of TNT
(4 major points)
The historical bases of TNT lie on a number of factors:
- Despite many advances over time, a substantial proportion of non-metastatic rectal cancer patients (especially among those with high-risk features) suffer tumour recurrence.
- While adjuvant chemotherapy is still offered in many cases, this has never been shown to be beneficial if neoadjuvant radiotherapy and high-quality surgery are carried out; by contrast, it has long been hypothesised that moving systemic chemotherapy from the adjuvant to the neoadjuvant setting could ensure better compliance and an early and more efficient targeting of micrometastases, which now outperform local residual disease as the leading cause of recurrence
- Emerging data suggesting a time-dependent radiotherapy effect on tumour regression have gradually led physicians to stretch the radiotherapy-to-surgery interval, thus opening an opportunity window for the delivery of sequential, preoperative chemotherapy.
- Finally, intensification of neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to increase the proportion of patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR), and could therefore become eligible for watch & wait, an approach that has gained more and more traction over the last few years given the excellent survival data and positive implications in terms of long-term functional outcome and quality of life.
What are the risk factors for AIN and Anal SCC?
- HPV infection
- HIV infection
- High risk sexual behaviour:
- MSM
- Anoreceptive intercourse
- Multiple sexual partners
- Personal history of CIN, Gynaecological cancers
- Chronic immunosuppression
- Smoking
Describe the classification of dysplastic lesions of the anal canal.
The initial Bethesda system consisting of AIN I, II, and III was modelled on cervical neoplasia. Further clarification of the relationship of AIN with HPV, and the discovery that the oncogenic pathways of anal and genital cancers are closely related, has recently led to a simpler system consisting of a two- tiered approach of “low grade” and “high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions” (LSIL and HSIL, respectively).
Under this system, AIN I corresponds to LSIL and AIN II/III to HSIL. HSIL lesions are considered premalignant, whereas LSIL lesions are not felt to be premalignant, but do have the potential to progress to HSIL.
The term ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) will occasionally appear in pathology reports and can be generally included in the LSIL category.
Describe the pathophysiology of HPV mediated anal SCC
Up to 95% of anal SCC is thought to be HPV-related.
HPV infects basal epithelial cells with a predilection for the transformation zone. The virus enters the cells and alters cellular function to produce viral proteins and replicate itself. High-risk HPV, (hrHPV) subtypes, specifically HPV 16 and HPV 18, produce viral proteins E6 and E7 which function like oncoproteins. In hrHPV subtypes, E6 and E7 viral proteins interact with cell cycle growth factors allowing for integration into the hosts DNA, leading to uncontrolled cellular reproduction and escape of programmed cell death.
With a persistent infection, there is potential for gene dysregulation resulting in increased cell growth and progression to a precancerous lesion and possibly invasive carcinoma.
What is the estimated time course of HPV mediated anal SCC?
In the cervix, the development of cervical SCC via persistence of HPV may take approximately 10
years, with known cytological correlates for precancerous and malignant conditions.
HPV in anal SCC may progress through similar cycles of infection, clearance, persistence, and eventual progression leading to AIN and anal SCC.
Describe the HPV Vaccine and its utility.
When should people get vaccinated?
What are the potential benefits?
In Australia, anyone over 9 years of age who wants to protect themselves against HPV are encouraged to talk to their primary care doctor about getting immunised.
The best time to get immunised is prior to becoming sexually active. The vaccine will not protect against HPV-related cancer from previous infections with any of the HPV types included in the HPV vaccine. 9 types of HPV are covered in the NIP vaccine, including the four strains (16, 18, 6, 11) most likely to cause severe disease.
It is important to appreciate that some studies demonstrate that HPV vaccine also appears to be effective in preventing recurrent high- grade AIN when administered after the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade AIN in HIV negative MSM. One study reported decreased rates of recurrent HSIL and anal cancer when vaccination was administered after diagnosis of HSIL.
What is Fluorouracil?
How does it work?
Side effect profile?
What is Leucovorin?
Fluorouracil (FU) is a pyrimidine analog antimetabolite that interferes with DNA and RNA synthesis.
After activation, F-UMP (an active metabolite) is incorporated into RNA to replace uracil and inhibit cell growth. The active metabolite inhibits thymidylate synthetase, depleting thymidine triphosphate (required for DNA synthesis).
It undergoes hepatic metabolism and excreted in the urine.
Main adverse effects include bone marrow suppression, cardiotoxicity, GIT toxicity (diarrhoea, stomatitis, mucositis), and palmer-plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome).
Leucovorin is a reduced form of folic acid and restores active folate stores required for DNA/RNA synthesis. It potentiates 5-FU.
What is Oxaliplatin?
How does it work?
Side effect profile?
Oxaliplatin is a platinum derivative that is an alkylating agent type of chemotherapy.
The platinum compound binds to DNA, forming cross links, which in turn inhibits DNA replication and transcription, resulting in apoptosis.
Adverse reactions include bone marrow suppression, QT prolongation, GIT toxicity, haemorrhage, and neuropathy, both acute and persistent. Also hepatotoxic with sinusoidal injury (often used as NAC in liver mets).
What is Bevacizumab?
How does it work?
What are the risks of Bev + FOLFOX/FOLFIRI?
Bevacizumab (Avastin) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
The inhibition of tumour cell VEGF leads to a reduction in microvascular growth of tumor blood vessels and thus limits the blood supply to tumor tissues.
The addition of Bevacizumab to a regimen containing FU/LV plus Irinotecan or oxaliplatin (Bev + FOLFIRI or FOLFOX) showed benefit in improving survival for metastatic colorectal cancer, although was associated with additional adverse effect of bleeding, hypertension, bowel perforation, and thromboembolic events.
What is Cetuximab?
How does it work?
Cetuximab is a mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); the benefit of this drug in metastatic colorectal cancer is limited to wild-type RAS/BRAF.
Its benefit is limited in stage III colon cancer, in the adjuvant setting post colectomy. This was even shown in wild-type RAS/BRAF stage III colon cancer as per two major trials – N0147 and PETACC8 trials (Andre et al. 2020, Kerr et al. 2016)
What is meant by “Targeted Therapy” in colorectal cancer?
What are some common examples?
Targeted therapy refers to small molecules, such as monoclonal antibodies, that can augment molecular pathways critical to cancer-specific growth and maintenance.
Common examples of targeted therapy include antibodies against VEGF, the EGFR, B-type RAF (BRAF) V600E, and the human EGFR 2 (HER2).
Targeted therapy is now almost exclusively used in patients with metastatic disease.
What are the main molecular sub-types of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)?
The main molecular subtypes of mCRC are
- KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild type
- KRAS/NRAS mutated
- BRAF mutated
- HER2 mutated
- MSI high and MMR deficient
What are the 3 main pathways of colorectal oncogenesis?
CRC evolves from 3 main pathways:
(1) Chromosomal instability (CIN) pathway
(2) MSI pathway
(3) CPG island mutator phenotype (CIMP) promotor pathway.
Aberrations within these molecular pathways are not mutually exclusive and occur in both sporadic and inherited CRCs. For example, CIN is present in 85%, CIMP in 20%, and MSI in 15% of tumors.
Describe what is meant by the “Chromosomal Instability Pathway”
The CIN pathway was the first major genetic pathway identified in CRC and is the most common, with approximately 65-75% of sporadic cases CRC attributable to this pathway.
The traditional model of colorectal adenoma to carcinoma as decribed by Vogelstein typifies the CIN whereby multiple mutational events conspire to produce karyotypic variability and also oncogenicity.
The karyotypic variability reflects the high mutation phenotype, whereas the specific APC, KRAS, DCC, and p53 mutations represents specific oncogenic mutations.
Each of the key mutations represent important genes within recognised pathways that contribute to colorectal cancer:
- APC = wNT canonical pathway
- KRAS = MAPK/ERK pathway
- p53 = mTOR pathway and the p53 pathway
- SMAD4 = TGF-ß pathway
*
Describe the importance of the ERK-MAPK pathway.
Cite therapeutic targets within your answer.
The pathway most connected with the pathogenesis, progression, and oncogenic behavior of CRC is the ERK MAPK (extracellular-regulated-kinase mitogen-activated-pathway-kinase).
This pathway is one of the most important for cell proliferation and is frequently stimulated by binding of the growth factors to receptors in the cell membrane. One such receptor is epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The EGF receptor is a therapeutic target for targeted antibody therapies such as Cetuximab and Panitumumab.
Mutations affecting the enzymes within this pathway have significant therapeutic implicaitons; KRAS mutations result in abnormally high activity through MAPK pathways, and signal transduction is no longer reliant on receptor stimulation. Therefore, targeted therapy with EGFR receptor blockers (Cetuiximab and Panitumumab) does not benefit patients with RAS mutations.





