Collection of evidence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

BACKGROUND - LOFTUS AND PALMER

Findings

A

9mph difference between speed estimates
More twice as many participants reported seeing broken glass

Leading questions can distort memory

SAMPLE - 45 university students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe cognitive interviews

A

improve witness’s recall of events to stop their memory being distorted by leading questions via open ended Qs

FOUR COMPONENTS
1) Context reinstatement of OG context - asking them to remember the context they were in + what they were doing
> cues eg. smell, sight

2) Report everything - freely recall everything

3) Change order - asked to recall events in different orders

4) Change perspective - eg. across the street

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BACKGROUND - FISHER
- sample

A

16 detectives from Florida
All experienced with minimum 5 years within division

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

BACKGROUND - FISHER
-findings

A
  • trained detectives elicited 47% more information after cognitive interview training than untrained
  • cognitive interview is effective in the field
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

BACKGROUND - FISHER
- sampling bias
- ethnocentrism

A

SAMPLING BIAS
- all detectives experiences + given proper CI training
- sample not representative of all police officers
- may be better than normal due to experience + training
- sample from robbery division specialising in other crimes so CI not as effective

ETHNOCENTRISM
- sample from Florida, USA
- not applied to cultures with different relationships with police / views on crime

blind procedure - reduces bias
- field experiment - high ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
- review of components of cognitive interview
- to assess effectivness
- effectivness of context-reinstatment

A
  • when context-reinstatement is used alone obtains as much infomation from witnesses as full CI procedure
  • other research found full CI leads to greater recall than another other component of CI

(contradictory research - some also say its not effective on own)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
- effectiveness of report everything component

A

= when used alone avoided leading questions so interview less likely to affect witnesses’ memory

= however could lead to witness filling in gaps in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
- effectiveness of change order component

A

= suggests its more effective if witness recall in forward order once, then reverse order

rather than two attempts to recall from beginning

= said more research needs to be done

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
- effectiveness of change perspective component

A

= research suggests it could lead to fabricated details and confuse witnesses
= no research suggests it alone increases amount of info recalled

however, one study they reviewed, involving children, found all components were equally effective, but when included adults found context reinstatement is most effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
Conclusions on effectivness of four components

A

Needs to be further experimental research as not enough has been conducted
All 4 need to be tested in different combinations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
Reviewing CI against other types of interview

Conclusions

A

standard interview - rapid-fire questions and frequent interruptions

guided memory interview - encouraging them to recall different contexts

structured interview - builds report using open questions, doesn’t interrupt + aims to build their confidence

Conclusions
= CI is better than standard interview at collecting evidence from witnesses
= but shouldn’t be compared as too different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
Review on quality of training

A

Found training in cognitive interviews are often inconsistent

Suggest police officers should be given better training in how to conduct a CI and recommend a two-day programme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
- Validity

A

Some research involved using CI for fake events
- low ecological validity
- participants would not have same emotions as witness to a real crime

Some involved primary school children
- judgments are different to adults/older children
- memory easily distorted
- reduces population validity

Some research involved real witness
- high ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

KEY RESEARCH - MEMON & HIGHAM
- Sampling Bias

A

Some included young children
- hard to generalise

Some included adults
- similar results
- more generalisable

ETHNOCENTRISM
= looked at western cultures only
- non western cultures may have different views
- Lee found Chinese children find lying is good as value modesty more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Research into collecting evidence from suspects
- Reid Technique

A

coercive interrogation technique used in US
- assumption suspect is guilty

includes
- Confrontation (saying their guilty)
- Stopping denials
- Presenting two guilty interpretations - one more acceptable
- Urging suspect to tell truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Problems with Reid Technique

A

stopping denials can prevent innocent explaining how they couldn’t commit the crime

people may feel pressured to admitting something they didn’t do

young, more compliant people more likely to give false confessions

17
Q

Strategies for Police Interviews

A

> PEACE model
audio recordings

18
Q

PARA for PEACE mdoel

A

non- accusatory model to reduce false confessions
- doesn’t stop denials + allows suspect to give account of what happened
- if there are inconsistencies in account of events, police evaluate whether they are guilty of not

HOW
- Planning + Prepration - eg going over case study
- Engaging- offering drink + showing they understand what he’s going through
- Account - ‘Tell me what happened’ and allow them to talk freely
- Closure - plan how to end it so its not abrupt
- Evaluation - go over other accounts of evidence after

GOOD BECAUSE
= effective as assumes witness/suspect who is lying to gradually build up inconsistences
= ethical wat of collecting evidence

19
Q

PARA for audio recordings

A

provide real evidence that an interview took place and verify what was said in it

HOW
= follow certain procedures
= unwrap and open the recording material
= introduce names of everyone in room
= give data and time
= explain that interview is being audibly recorded

GOOD
= useful as they act as a safeguard for both police and suspects
= more accurate record of the interviews than note-taking