Collapse of Personal Rule and events of Long Parliament 1640-2 Flashcards
Short Parliament
April 1640
- called after 1st Bishops’ War to raise army against Covenanters
- MPs demanded grievances addressed e.g. abolish Ship money, fiscal feudalism, etc.
- C dissolved, calls Wentworth to help him in Second Bishops’ War
Petition of Twelve Peers
Aug 1640
- grievances against the Crown e.g. religion; bringing in of Irish forces; ship money; personal rule
- would expect 12 peers (House of Lords) to be more in favour of King
- refused to provide money unless another P called (triggered Long P)
Long Parliament
Nov 1640 - 1660
- few MPs wanted Civil war
Bedford and the Bridging appointments
Feb 1641
- attempt to pull back from war … but then Bedford dies
- finding financial settlement for royal income
- to ‘bridge the gap’ between Crown + Parli
- opposed Crown’s gov more than concept of PR, not an opposition programme
- when Bedford died, end to moderate views in Parli
Wentworth Impeachment, Attainder, Execution
Nov 1640
- impeachment against Wentworth ‘evil councillor’
=> sets up strong antipathy between Charles and Pym
1641
- Bill of Attainder (to remove threats of state w/out trial)
- Scots declare no peace until Wentworth dead and end to Scottish bishops
May 1641
- Protestation Oath - C fears for family so gives assent to Wentworth’s execution
Root & Branch petition
Dec 1640 - petition signed by Londoners - abolish bishops from Church of Eng - basis for R+B bill (Dec 1641 Bishops banned from House of Lords) => rebellion against Laudianism
Laud’s impeachment
1640-1 - Pym called up Laud to trial for tyranny of church and state - Laud imprisoned in Tower of London - Laud executed Jan 1645 => C abandoned Laud - backpedal on Laudianism - room for manoeuvring w/ Charles - pull back from war
Triennial Act
Feb 1641
(- abolished ship money)
- C had to call Parliament every 3 years for 50 days
- if not, Lord Chancellor would call w/out C’s consent
=> no chance of another PR
=> removes Crown’s ultimate power to call/dismiss Parliament
Army Plot & Protestation Oath
May 1641
- Pym reveals rumours of a royalist “Army Plot” to seize Tower of London to release Wentworth + dissolve Parliament
- Parli pass a bill: x be dissolved w/out their own consent; Wentworth executed
- “Protestation Oath” to be taken by all MPs:
‘prevent undermining of Common Law’;
‘stop arbitrary government’
‘pledge allegiance to Protestant religion’
‘defend King but also power and privilege of Parliament’
=> Bill of Attainder needs royal assent: pressure of army and London crowds (C fears for family)
=> Prot Oath further limits C’s power - C losing control
10 Propositions
June 1641 King needs to make concessions: - Parli control over those around queen - Parli control over religious education for royal children => radicalism confirmed
Abolition of Star Chamber, High Commission, Ship money
1641
- all abolished in Long P
=> people + PN willing to go against King’s ruling
The Incident
Oct 1641
- plot against (attempt to kidnap/murder) marquis of Argyll and marquis of Hamilton
- hatched by Earl of Montrose (Royalist)
=> many suspected C involved - suggest he sanctioned force ag. opponents + broke law
The Irish Rebellion
Oct 1641 - 1642
- revolutionary
- When Wentworth left, obvious he had alienated all groups in Ireland
- Irish Catholics attack Protestants in Ulster, massacring at least 3000
=> influenced the English, radicalising events
=> fear of Catholicism spread
=> fear of English troops in Ireland being brought home to use against Parli
The Grand Remonstrance
Nov 1641 (Pym)
- list of criticisms of Charles’ gov
- strongly anti-Catholic
- Assembly of Divines discussing religious settlement to be held separately
- 159 votes to 148 that it should be published
=> direct attack on C
=> political issues deliberately moved to involve people more, pressure on MPs
=> debate: real division in Parli = formation of two opposing sides of Civil War
=> C gives measured and conciliatory response… still time to pull back?
Militia Bill & Ordinance
Dec 1641, March 1641 became ordinance (Sir Arthur Haselrig)
- forced MPs to take sides on command of army
- reduce C’s power over army
- P’s right to app. army commanders
- P would thf have control over army raised ag. Irish rebels
- In response, C positioned himself as “Defender of the Constitution’ => won over const. royalists
=> revolutionary
=> directly questioned C’s Royal P
=> transferral of powers to Parliament
=> becomes an ordinance = can pass law w/out Charles