Cognitive Psychology For Sports Performance Flashcards
What is performance
The behavioural act of executing a skill at a specific time and in a specific situation
Performance is temporary
What is learning
A change in the capability of a person to perform a skill; it must be inferred from a relatively per any improving in performance as a result of practice or experience Learning is (relatively) permanent
What is deliberate practice
Based on the idea that expertise in any domain is tied explicitly to the amount and type of training or practice performed in that domain
Challenging and effortful
Requires repetition and feedback
Completed for the purpose of performance enhancement
May not inherently enjoyable or immediately rewarding (Ericsson, 2003, 2007, 2008)
Self-Regulation
Self regulation = self-generated thoughts, feelings and behaviours that are planned and cyclically adapted based on performance feedback (Zimmermann, 1989, 1998)
Experts differ not just in what they do in practice sessions (deliberate practice)
Experts can also control the intensity and duration of their behaviours surrounding practice
Zimmerman’s three phases of self-regualtion
Performance phase
(Record performance)
Forethought phase Self-reflection phase
(Set process goals) (Attribution error)
Singer (1988) Five Step Approach
For self-paced (closed) motor tasks
- Ready - physical, emotional, psychological - aware of breathing environment thoughts
- Image - visual & Kinaesthetic - may include self-talk - increases awareness of instructions, task demands and own movement
- Focus - concentrate intensely on one relevant feature of the situation eg Seams of tennis ball
- Execute - perform without thinking of movement of the outcome
- Evaluate - effectiveness of the movement and the effectiveness of each of the five steps
Cognitive effort
The mental work involved in making decisions (Lee, Swinnen & Serrien, 1994)
Comparing analysing, evaluating, deciding requires cognitive effort and produces learning
Mindless repetitions does not require cognitive effort
Blocked vs random practice (contextual interference
Blocked practice eg AAABBBCCC
LOW contextual interference
Random practice eg ABCABCABC
HIGH contextual interference
Contextual interference effect
Performing multiple skills in a random order disrupts performance but may benefit learning
Supported by Shea & Morgan (1979)
Explains CI effect: Elaboration Hypothesis
Shea & Morgan (1979)
Memories for movement (or motor programs) exist in a long term memory, and are recalled every time we perform an action
Predictions of Elaborative Hypothesis
High contextual inter fences leads to the formation of more elaborate memories which:
Facilitates memory retrieval, and
Are more resistant to decay
Prediction: if you could measure how elaborating memories are, then after a period of practice, participants in a random group should have more elaborate memories
Due to more elaborative processing = more elaborative memories
Evidence for elaboration
Interviews after a CL experiment
BLOCKED group subject B: After a couple of times… didn’t take real conscious effort
RANDOM group subject W: The green one is essentially the mirror image of the red
Shea & Zimney (1983)
Action Plan Reconstruction
Lee & Magill’s (1985) Action Plan Reconstruction theory offers another explanation of the contextual interference effect based on the amount of processing that occurs between working memories and LTM
BLOCKED practice: plan for action remains in working memory (limited processing)
RANDOM practice: plan for action must be actively reconstructed on each trail (higher processing
Repeating the process of solving a problem (Bernstein)
Challenge point framework
The benefits of random practice (vs blocked practice) for learning will be increased for the tasks of lowest nominal difficulty (ie simple motor skills)
Low levels of CI may be better for beginner skill levels of CI may be better for more highly skilled individuals? A continuum rather than blocked vs random practice - serial practice
Finding the optimal challenge point is key
What did Schmidt & Wrisberg (2004) say (CI)
Repetitions are essential for learning, repetitiveness is not
Wulf et al. (1998)
First direct empirical test on focus of attention
33 participants performers shalom-type movement on a ski-simulator
Experimental groups differed on type of instructions they receive to guide focus of attention
Internal = focus on keeping feet horizontal
External = focus on keeping wheels horizontal
Control = no focus intructions
Internal focus was not more effective than no instructions
External focus = larger movement amplitudes and enchanted learning
Internal vs external focus
Internal - directed at specific actions of the body eg step by step technical points, focus on: swing of the arms, wrist motion/hand movement darts
External - directed at the effects that the movement will have on the environment
Focus on : swing of the club, rim of the basket, on the bullseye
Constrained action hypothesis
Proposed that internal vs external focus instructions induce differing modes of motor control
Internal focus - causes people to consciously control the processes that would otherwise automatically regulate movement coordination. Effective and efficient natural motor coordination processes are constrained by intervening with these processes
External focus- promotes an automatic, unconscious fast, reflective mode of motor control and organisation. Reduces concours interference in the automatic processes controlling our movements, therefore resulting in enhanced performance and learning
What can conscious control cause
‘Paralysis by analysis’
Distance effects
Increasing the distance if the attentional focus from the body might accentuate the advantages of an external focus
Proximal foci may be too similar to internal focus
(McNevin, Shea & Wulf
Distance and expertise
Wulf et al. 2000
For beginners, external focus effects may not be able to be related to the body movements that produce it.
A nearer focus eg club may be more directly related to the appropriate movement pattern
Vallacher (1993)
Control over movements and actions is represented hierarchically
As we become more skilled the action becomes controlled at progressively higher levels
Proximal vs Distal Foci
Distal external (ball path) focus shown to be more effective in golf putting than proximal external (club focus) in golf putting (Kearney, 2014)
Knowledge & Learning
Knowledge about motor skills exists in two forms: Declarative Knowledge & Procedural Knowledge
Learning may be explicit or implicit
Declarative Knowledge
Knowledge you can declare about performing the skill - knowing ‘what’ to do
Usually associated with technical instructions and ‘rules’ related to performing a skill
For example ‘I need to move the club head back smoothly and keep my head still’ (Maxwell et al., 2006)
Procedural Knowledge
Knowing HOW to do a skill, but not necessarily being able to verbalise each step
Knowing how to perform a skill under strict time constraints in sport, but not necessarily able to identify each step or rule
‘Automatic’ processing eg riding a bicycle
Less prone to breakdown under pressure
Explicit learning
Learning through the development of declarative rules specifying behaviour
Learning is the process of incorporating hundreds of these rules into your action
Learning is the process of incorporating hundreds of these rules into your actions
Typically heavily involved in novice learning
When elite athletes perform optimally often they don’t think about anything (Williams & Keane, 2001)
Knowledge complication
Knowledge complication is the term that Anderson (1992, 1996) uses to describe the process by which bits of declarative knowledge, and the rules explaining their connections, are combined into larger memory chunks
This is a gradual process. The greater the degree of learning, the larger the chunks that are formed
Therefore, an athlete can have both procedural and declarative knowledge
Choking under pressure
Defined as ‘performance deferments under circumstances that increase the importance of good or improved performance’ (Baumeister, 1984)
Paralysis by analysis (Jackson & Beilock, 2007)
Constrained action hypothesis (Wulf et al., 2001
Paying too much attention disrupts skill execution