Cognitive psychology Flashcards
what is encoding?
How info is ‘transferred’ into a memory store + converted into a particular form (e.g. acoustic)
what is retrieval?
getting the info back- ‘recall’
What is duration?
How long info lasts in a memory store
What is capacity?
How much info a memory store can hold
The multi store model (model and by who?)
Revise the model!!
(Atkinson and Shiffrin 1968)
What is the STM capacity, duration and how is it encoded?
C- 7+/-2 items
D-18-30 seconds
E- acoustically
What is the LTM capacity, duration and how is it encoded?
C- unlimited
D- lifetime
E- semantically
What is the Sensory store capacity, duration and how is it encoded?
C- huge
D- half a second
E- matches the sense it comes from
How does Peterson and Peterson support the MSM?
suggests that STM has a very short duration as long as rehearsal is prevented
Rehearsal is necessary for info to be stored for any longer than 30 seconds
We have a separate STM & LTM - by putting a limit on STM, shows we have LTM too as we can remember some info for years
Peterson and Peterson aim?
1959-To investigate the duration of STM (Lloyd and Margaret Peterson) tested hypothesis that info that is not rehearsed is lost quickly from STM
What is the case study of HM?
-27 yrs
-Operated on - seizures
-Bilateral hippocampus removed
-Referred to Penfield and Milner (amnesia)
-good sample as injury was localised and his personality + intelligence = intact
-unable to make new memories
-Had a lot of memories pre-surgery
-still possessed LTM, couldnt add to it
How does HM support the MSM, and how does it not?
supports idea that we have separate STM and LTM
-some of his LTM largely intact (childhood)
-couldn’t form new memories (STM badly damaged -cant pass new info into LTM)
Demonstrates different types of LTM (procedural and episodic) - structure of the MSM = over-simplistic
-Got better at star task (procedural) but could not recall doing it (episodic)
What was Bahricks study?
How does Bahrick support the MSM?
Suggests LTM has a potentially unlimited duration (can last a lifetime) as people can recognise faces of classmates from 48 years ago
Supports MSM’s separate memory stores (we know we can only hold on to some memories for a very short time, so we must have a separate STM too.)
What is the application of the MSM?
tells us how to improve our memory in some situations-You need to rehearse it. This means that the model is useful. This is particularly so in an educational environment- students know that they need to revise for an exam.
What are some shortcomings of the MSM?
MSM is over-simplistic: it does not account for different types of STM and LTM (as demonstrated by the case study of HM) Therefore it can be considered reductionist.(It reduces memory to a simple set of unitary stores)
over-emphasises the role of rehearsal. Neither can it explain the vivid recall people have for ‘flashbulb memories’.
For example, memories of significant emotional events are often remembered very clearly although they have not been actively rehearsed.
What is Milner?
1962-In the trials
draw a line between two outlines of a five-pointed star while watching his hand and the page in a mirror
Task repeated several times on several different occasions.
did not remember doing it yet performance improved. although he was not conscious of it, Henry was able to learn new motor skills by repeated practice.
conclude that this form of memory, called motor learning, must be distinct from the system of memory that records new facts, faces and experiences. it must be located in a different part of the brain, one unaffected by Henry’s operation.
Strengths of HM?
• The study also helps us understand the risks of brain surgery and the side-effects of brain damage, which would enable doctors and patients to weigh up the risks of surgical procedures (HM might not have agreed to his surgery in 1953 if the consequences had been understood).
a great deal of qualitative information was gathered on H.M. this gives a depth of understanding/great insight into how memory works. This means that there is more than just quantitative data from experiments to support the MSM
Weaknesses of HM?
Small sample-
Case studies are unusual by nature, so will have poor reliability (R) as replicating them exactly will be unlikely.
Baddeley 1966B aims?
To carry out an experiment to investigate encoding in LTM.
• This was to establish whether encoding was different to STM after finding out (1966a) that encoding in STM was mainly acoustic.
Baddeley 1966B procedure?
Laboratory experiment designed to test the sequential recall of acoustically and semantically similar word lists.
• Four lists of 10 words were used. List A contained 10 acoustically similar words
List B contained 10 acoustically dissimilar words matched in terms of frequency of everyday use
List C contained 10 semantically similar words
List D contained 10 semantically dissimilar words matched in terms of frequency of
everyday use
List B and D acted as baseline controls for Lists A and C.
• Participants:
72 men and women from the applied psychology research unit. It was an independent groups design (each of them did one list only)
Each list of 10 words was presented via a projector at the rate of one word every three seconds in the correct order.
• Participants were required to complete six tasks involving memory for digits.
• They were then asked to recall the word list in one minute writing them down in the correct order.
• This was repeated over four learning trials.
• This was not a test of learning words but a test of sequence order so the word list was made visible in the room arranged in a random order.
• After the four learning trials the groups were given a 15 minute interference task copying 8 digit sequences at their own pace.
• After the interference task participants were given a surprise retest on the word list sequence.
Baddeley 1966B findings?
• Recall of acoustically similar sounding words was worse than dissimilar sounding words during the initial phase of learning. The recall of acoustically similar and dissimilar words was not statistically significant in the retest.
This demonstrates that STM is encoded acoustically, and that acoustic similarity does not affect recall from LTM
• Participants found the semantically similar words more difficult to learn
than the semantically dissimilar words. They recalled significantly fewer
semantically similar words on the retest.
(There was no significant difference in the long-term recall of acoustically similar or dissimilar words.)
This demonstrates that LTM is encoded semantically
Baddeley 1966B conclusions?
• The fact that participants found it more difficult to recall list one in the initial phase of learning suggests that short-term memory is largely acoustic, therefore acoustically similar sounding words were more difficult to encode.
• Later retest recall of list three was impaired compared to all other lists because they were semantically similar, suggesting that encoding in long-term memory is largely, but not exclusively, semantic.
Baddeley 1966B generalisation?
Baddeley has a large sample of 72. Any anomalies (people with unusually good or bad memories) will be “averaged out” in a sample this size. This suggests you can generalise from this sample.
• However, there were so many conditions in this study that each group only had 15-20 people in it. That’s not a lot. Only 15 people did the acoustically similar condition. An anomaly could make a difference to scores with numbers that small.
• Mix of males and females so no gender-bias
However, a volunteer sample might have more people with particularly good memories who enjoy doing memory tests – so,not representative of people in the wider population.