Cognitive Psych: Exam #2 Flashcards

1
Q

STM is limited in…

A

Capacity and duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Working memory definition

A

the use or manipulation of information to accomplish a particular task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elements of Baddley’s WM model

A

1) central executive
2) visuospatial sketch pad
3) episodic buffer
4) phonological loop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Phonological loop

A

holds and manipulates auditory information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Visuospatial sketch pad

A

Holds and manipulates visual and spatial information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Episodic buffer

A

How you combine information from the phonological loop and visuospatial sketch pad
- ex: making a mental map from verbal directions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Central executive

A

decision making: manages and coordinates the use of working memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The central executive is involved in…

A

1) updating: replacing old content with new information (ex: have to remember last 3 letters)
2) Shifting: changing goal of the task
3) inhibition: avoid making a response
4) maintenance: keeps information in WM
5) disengagement: cancels previous information or goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evidence that working memory components are separable

A

study: people are given a chess task and also a secondary task that either involved 1) the phonological loop (repeating a word aloud) 2) the visuospatial sketch pad (tap out a pattern) 3) generate random letters (central executive)
results: the visual and central executive task had more cost –> relates back to capacity as this is what you are using during the chess task – phonological loop had no cost so suggests there are different stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Parts of working memory

A

Central executive + STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evidence that attention is involved in WM

A

1) as your cognitive load increases (anything else that requires attention) your digit span decreases
2) can also be flipped: your attention is worse when your memory load is high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Applications of stress and WM

A

the more stressed you are the smaller your digit span is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Operation span task

A

given a simple addition or subtraction problem and have to remember the second digit presented (ex: 5 + 6 = ? have to solve for 11 and remember 6)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How id Baddeley’s model different from Atkinson and Shiffrin

A

WM is limited in capacity
WM is separated from control processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Applications of Central Executive

A

1) can decide how best to chunk items
2) how best to store information (ex: visually or verbally)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Differences between LTM and STM

A

1) the rate of forgetting is much slower in LTM than STM
2) LTM is unlimited in capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Atkinson and Shiffrin: How does info get into LTM?

A

due to control processes:
1) rehearsal: repetition of items over and over until learned
2) coding: place new information in context with older information
3) imaging: using visual images to learn verbal information (ex: method of loci)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Serial positioning curve

A

1) primacy effect: items first presented are recalled the best
2) recency effect: more recently learned items are recalled better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Primacy effect definition and evidence

A

earlier presented items have a higher recall probability due to more rehearsal
- evidence: told participants to only rehearse each item twice - primacy effect decreased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Recency effect: definition and evidence

A

items last presented have a higher recall probability due to dumping from STS
- evidence: if you wait 30 seconds until retrieval, the recency effect goes away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Serial positioning curve and amnesia

A

amnesiacs have impaired LTM so they do not show a primacy effect (nothing gets to LTM) but they do show a recency effect (as this is due to STM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Types of LTM

A

1) declarative: facts and concepts (episodic: recollections of personal experiences) and semantic: general knowledge about the world)
2) procedural: actions, skills and operations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Evidence for different types of LTM

A

study: amnesiacs and controls where they study a list of words and take a recall, recognition, fragment identification, or cued recall test
findings: amnesiacs were just as good as controls for fragmented and cued recall but but recall or recognition - suggests different memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Direct memory task

A

directly ask people to search memory and recall/recognize past events
- ex: recall and recognition tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Indirect memory tests

A

a test that does not explicitly ask about past events but is influenced by the memory of those events
- ex: fragment identification and cued recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Superior episodic memory

A

people who can remember all the details of their lives
aka “HSAM”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

HSAM + semantic memory

A

study: HSAM participants asked either a episodic question (about a memory in the past) or a semantic question (about general knowledge)
findings: they were better at episodic memory than control but slower at giving semantic memories - suggests there are different memory stores for episodic and semantic memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is the purpose of memory?

A

1) recall past events
2) use general knowledge to navigate certain situations
3) envision the future: both semantic and episodic memory: you retrieve specific experience and recombine them into something new
- semantic memory play more of a role in goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Evidence for procedural memory being separate from declarative memory

A

1) if you have read a story once before, you are faster at reading it a second time but you do not get many quiz questions right (even true for amnesiacs)
2) HM: retrograde and anterograde amnesia but STM and procedural memory intact (shows physical seperation for LTM and STM in the brain)

30
Q

Engram

A

the neural substrate for storing and recalling memories

31
Q

Hebbian Learning

A

memories are formed via changes in the connections between neurons

32
Q

Brain regions important for memory

A
  • cortex
  • hippocampus: thought to bind diverse information into a coherent whole
33
Q

Consolidation definition

A

The process by which memories are created and stored by individual neurons
- “things that fire together wire together” - the more times the elements of a memory fire together (emotions, location, age etc) they eventually become one thing (the hippocampus is no longer needed to bind them together)

34
Q

How do we strengthen neural connections?

A

Study 1: people had to remember the place of a cat on the board - when they went to sleep, they were cued with the meow that was played during learning
- meow reactivated the memory of the meow and thus the cats place on the board (consolidation)
- if you are cued during sleep forgetting decreases

Study 2: people had to listen to a story and either wakeful rest (just sit there) or complete a spot the difference task
- immediate recall: same performance
- after a week: people who were in the wakeful rest condition had better memory – you can strengthen connections by thinking about learning (consolidation is automatic)

35
Q

Metacognition

A

awareness of how cognitive processes affect or improve information processing
- ex: knowing what you know/don’t know is an example of metacognition

36
Q

Acquisition definition

A

storage of information in LTM

37
Q

Retention definition

A

maintaining information in LTM

38
Q

Retrieval definition

A

recalling information from LTM

39
Q

Judgement of Learning (JOL) definition

A

Your estimate of how well you think you have learned a concept

40
Q

Immediate JOL

A

how confident you are immediately after learning that in ____ amount of time you will be able to recall an item

41
Q

Delayed JOL

A

how confident you are after a delay that you will be able to recall the items you learned

42
Q

Immediate vs. delayed JOL

A

study: given pairs of random items for later recall and given immediate or delayed JOL for your comprehension of those items
Results:
- immediate JOL: you did worse than you predicted: the information feels familiar due to the recency effect (they are still in STM but have not actually transferred to LTM)
- delayed JOL: more accurate prediction and more accurate results

43
Q

Retrieval fluency

A

the ease with which you can recall an item

44
Q

Ways to improve retention

A

1) quizzing is better than studying for a long retention interval

45
Q

verbal rehearsal definition

A

rereading material out-loud over and over

46
Q

Does rote rehearsal help items get into LTM?

A

study: given a list of words but told you will be asked to recall the most recent one you saw starting with a “g” – every new “g” word you see replaces the old one
- manipulating how close the “g” words are: if they are back to back, you don’t rehearse the first one that much because it is immediately replaced (“g” word with the most items in between the next one should be best recalled)
- findings: more rehearsal did not increase recall

47
Q

Rehearsing and the primacy effect

A

Rehearsal has two functions:
1) maintaining items in STM: if this is the case (you are just trying to remember for now) you will not have better retention with more rehearsal
2) elaborating items for transfer to LTM and future retrieval: if time is used to enrich material, retention will improve

48
Q

Memory codes definition

A

the format of the information encoded into memory

49
Q

orienting task definition

A

instructions to focus on a particular aspect of the stimulus
- way to control which memory codes people choose

50
Q

Levels of Processing definition

A

There are multiple ways to encode material and some are better than others (semantic/deep is best)

51
Q

Levels of processing “levels”

A

from shallowest to deepest:
1) structural: emphasizes physical features
2) phonemic: emphasizes pronunciation
3) semantic: emphasizes meaning

52
Q

Evidence for LOP

A

study: presented 12 pairs of related items
conditions:
- structural: count all the “e’s” or number of letters
- semantic: rate the word’s pleasantness
- control: incidental learning (not warned about recall test)
Results: rating pleasantness (semantic) produced the best recall even if you did not know a test was coming

53
Q

Criticisms of LOP

A

1) it takes longer to do semantic processing than structural process so the effect is due to longer rehearsal time
2) it does not explain why semantic codes are more effective than structural codes

54
Q

Evidence for time in relation to semantic vs. structural processing

A

given a structural task that takes a long time (does this word follow a VVCCVV pattern?) or a semantic test that is short (see if a word fits into a sentence)
findings: you still had better recall for the semantic condition even though the structural took twice as long - semantic processing is driving the effect not time studying.

55
Q

Two explanations for why semantic codes are more effective

A

1) semantic codes are more elaborate
2) semantic codes are more distinctive

56
Q

Semantic coding and elaboration

A

when you process something semantically you don’t just store the item but also the associated items and the context
study: 3 different elaboration levels
- simple: the shirt is torn
- medium: the ghost frightened the children
- complex: the great bird swooped down and grabbed the struggling worm
findings:
- more elaborate/detailed things were remembred better
- elaboration has to be precise and consistent (detailed and related to the original context – saying “yes” it makes sense leads to a higher recall probability)

57
Q

Coding definition

A

placing new information in context with older, already learned information

58
Q

consolidation definition

A

a process by which memories are created and stored by individual neurons

59
Q

Long-term potentiation definition

A

strengthening of synapses that result from simultaneous activation

60
Q

What do students do under time pressure?

A

Study “judged easy” material

61
Q

Clustering definition

A

the number of associated pairs recalled together
- if salt and pepper are in a list, they are clustered as they are related

62
Q

Uncued recall

A

recall that has to occur without any hints or cues

63
Q

Cued recall

A

recall where a hint or cue is provided

64
Q

Study on precision of elaboration

A

conditions:
- base: the old man bought the paint
- imprecise: the old man bought the paint on the top shelf
- precise: the old man bought the paint to color his cane
- self-generation: the old man bought the paint to ____
findings: precise cues lead to best recall

65
Q

Emotional distinctiveness

A

items with high emotional impact are better remembered (ex: flashbulb memories)

66
Q

Encoding specificity principle definition

A

the effectiveness of a retrieval cue depends on how will it relates to the initial coding of the item

67
Q

Evidence for encoding specificity

A

study: you study a target word in either a rhyme or semantic condition
retrieval conditions:
- identical: given what you studied
- similar: another similar rhyme or associated with
- different: given the condition you did not study
findings: you are best when your study condition matches your test condition (you want to match level of processing at study and retrieval)

68
Q

Transfer appropriate processing definition

A

encoding material in a manner related to how it will later be used

69
Q

Evidence for transfer appropriate processing

A

study: you read a passage either expecting an inference test or a memory test
findings: you did best in whatever condition you were expecting

70
Q

Difference between encoding specificity and transfer appropriate processing

A

BOTH suggest good performance depends on maximizing the similarity between encoding and retrieval
Differ on:
1) transfer appropriate processing: retrieval condition are fixed so you decide how to encode the material
2) encoding specificity: you have already encoded the material and you choose the best retrieval cue