Cognitive Psych: Exam #1 Flashcards

1
Q

Define Cognition

A

the study of mental operations that support acquisition and use of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Broad applications for cognition

A

1) reading
2) learning
3) marketing
4) aging and dementia
5) eyewitness testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does cognitive psychology blend?

A
  • emphasis on constructs (memory, language etc) and the scientific rigor of behaviorism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does cognitive psychology investigate about sensory input?

A

The processes in which it is:
1) transformed (ie change fonts in a reading study)
2) reduced (ie how we focus on important information (such as optical illusions where you can only see one thing at a time)
3) elaborated (use previous info to expand on something)
4) stored (memory processes but not specifically retrieval – may not be accessible)
5) recovered (retrieval processes)
6) used (real world application – the behavior produced and often what is measured)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Structuralism overview

A
  • based on introspection: participants are asked to report their process/strategies when performing a task
  • Cons: relies on subjectivity, bias, availability of report (processes can be outside of our awareness)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Behaviorism overview:

A
  • based on observation: experimental approach where you manipulate something (IV) and measure the outcome (DV)
  • they don’t care exactly what the process is (think a black box) - just how changing the input changes the output
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pros of behaviorism

A
  • can control input to very fine detail
  • allows for designing interventions to fix problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cons of behaviorism

A
  • misses the WHY of the relationship between the IV and DV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Study: recall vs. recognition in amnesiac patients

A

Findings: controls AND amnesiacs perform higher on recognition memory tests than recall tests but the benefit is more severe for controls
- amnesiac results are worse overall
- demonstrated the “stored” part of cog psych definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Study: degraded stimuli in amnesiac patients

A

when both groups (controls and amnesiacs) saw the original stimuli, they were quicker to decode the degraded stimulus
- signifies amnesiacs don’t have a problem with encoding but rather retrieving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Common measures (DV) in psych research

A

Most common: accuracy and reaction time
Less common: reaching behavior and eye tracking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What theories do

A

assume an underlying intervening construct between the IV and DV
- loop in many elements of the same thing: water deprivation, salty food, and consumption of dry food are all related to the underlying intervening construct of “thirst”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of Theories

A

1) decrease number of relationships explained
2) gives you the ability to make predictions about future behavior
3) details something about the nature of the organism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Disadvantages of theories

A

1) may be premature if data isn’t strong enough
2) can delay more applied breakthroughs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Converging operations definition

A

used to discriminate amongst alternative theories
- usually multiple tests on one construct (for memory test all people on recall vs. recognition vs. implicit memory and see where the difference lies to figure out the correct theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Study with converging operations: swear words

A

hypothesis 1: visual thresholds are higher for taboo words due to emotional content
hypothesis 2: we have a learned inhibition of taboo words
- you would test this: by putting a swear word on the screen and you either a) have to say the word or b) say another word
- if it is inhibition, option a should take longer, if it is higher visual threshold, option b should take longer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cognitive Neuroscience Overview

A

combined methods and theories of cognitive psychology with methods from neuroscience
- usually looks at metabolic processes or brain structures to support different theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Neuroscience methods:

A

1) PET
2) fMRI
3) EEG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

PET imaging

A

-inject radioactive tracer in blood stream that binds to proteins in the brain and a scanner can pick up where concentrations are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

fMRI

A

measure hemodynamic changes in the brain
- pros: good spatial resolution
- cons: sensitive to movement, bad temporal resolution, noise protectors needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

EEG

A

measures electrical potential charges
- pros: good temporal resolution (can measure fast processes), noiseless
- con: sensitive to movement, worse spatial resolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

AI and cognitive psych

A
  • can serve as theoretical models of human cognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Methods to conduct research

A

1) case studies (good for small unusual populations)
2) correlational studies (for variables you can not manipulate such as age, economic status etc)
3) experimental studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Pattern recognition definition

A

the study of how people identify the objects in their environment
- this is a very complex process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Template theory of pattern recognition

A

an new pattern is matched against alternative patterns by using the degree of overlap as a measure of similarity
- we put a prior concept “over” the stimuli and see what matches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Problems with template theory

A

1) doesn’t allow for differences in orientation
2) doesn’t allow for differences in size
3) doesn’t allow you to take the same stimulus and have different representations (ex: optical illusions where we can see two things from one stimulus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Feature theory

A

Add all the components to define the thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Evidence for feature theory

A

mapping receptive fields:
- they put a device that records a single cell in the brains of cats
- saw that there is a single cell important for recognizing the orientation of each line
- cells fire at a specific feature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Criteria for a feature

A

1) features must be critical (present in some members of a set but not others - if you are trying to determine kind of tree, bark is not a feature)
2) features should remain unchanged under differences in brightness, size or perspective
3) different combinations of features should yield a unique pattern
4) number of features should be reasonably small

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How do we test for features?

A

1) rate similarity: use this to extract important features in defining an item
2) confusability ratings: more similar items are more confusable, suggesting they overlap in features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Removal of important features

A

impairs recognition
with letters:
1) midsection deletion: harder than intact
2) vertex deletion: the hardest - suggests that vertices are the best identifying feature of letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Cued distinctive features

A

gave children a card with similar letters: some pointed out the distinctive feature others did not
- when a relevant cue is provided, children did much better in distinguishing between the letters
- even if you take this cue away on a next trial, results still hold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Feature integration theory

A

feature are represented simultaneously and without need for attention (all features are available immediately at the same time)
- BUT attention is required to bind features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

How is feature integration theory tested?

A

adding more items - if you have 5 or 100 circles, it should not take you longer to decide if there is a red circle because all information is immediately available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Conjuctive feature and attention

A

Attention is required to bind multiple feature into coherent objects
- ex: a green square, a yellow T
- you should down as more items are added showing attention is needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Structure Theories

A

built from feature theories but specify HOW features fir together (suggests the structure of the item is what is important)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Evidence for structure theories

A

When you take away vertices and connecting features, identification time increases - it signifies is is the relationship of the features rather than the features themselves that is actually important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Common methodology for studying word recognition

A

1) rapid identification: items are presented very quickly and you are asked to identify what you saw (measuring accuracy)
2) lexical decision task: is ___ a real word or not? (measuring reaction time)
3) pronunciation / naming: speak this word aloud as quickly as you can (measuring reaction speed)

39
Q

What is a visual integration field?

A

areas in the eye that are sensitive to certain fields - every feature contained with one field is put together and considered to be one thing (such as a letter)

40
Q

Evidence for OVERLAPPING integration fields

A

study:
- presented with one letter (A), two letters (AB or BA) or three letters (ABC) extremely quickly
- targets with two flanking letters (three letter condition) were less accurately identified – evidence for overlapping visual integration fields

41
Q

Evidence for different shaped integration fields

A
  • presented with one letter (A), two letters (AB or BA) very quickly
  • one flanker causes more errors than two flankers
  • if the extra letter is on the left, accuracy decreases
  • we read left to right and this evidence suggests that visual fields have adapted to become larger to the left as the first letter is most important when reading
42
Q

Receptive fields and symbols - same as letters?

A
  • performance for one flanker did not matter which side it was on – (different from letters)
  • we have elongated receptive fields for letters but NOT for symbols
  • this did not adapt as the order of symbols does not have semantic meaning to us
43
Q

Serial processing definition

A

operations occur in sequence (one at a time)

44
Q

Parallel processing definition

A

all operations in the process occur all at one time

45
Q

Evidence for serial or parallel processing for words

A

Study 1: lexical decisions task
- 5-8 letters had very similar reaction time (suggest parallel processing for common lengthed words)
- but for 1-4 and 8-12, reaction time greatly increases (suggests usually serial processing but there is an exception for common lengthed words)

Study 2: words that differed by a single letter were presented very quickly
- manipulated where the letter was different and measured reaction time
- under serial processing, words with the last letter changed should be the least accurate (not enough time to see this change)
- under parallel processing, where the letter change was should not matter
- findings: at 24+ms you are better than chance for ALL conditions - suggests parallel processing

46
Q

Is meaning acquired through serial or parallel processing?

A

Study: asked if ___ letter occurred in a specific position
- word condition: presented with a word
- letter condition: one letter presented
- nonword condition: string of random letters presented
- we recognize letters better (when they are presented very quickly) if they occur in the context of a real word
- due to top down processing: knowledge of words influences what you perceive
- suggets operations occur in parallel

47
Q

Interactive Activation

A

the levels happen in parallel but also influence each other (meaning can influence letter recognition and vice versa)

48
Q

excitatory connection

A

give you evidence for something

49
Q

inhibitory connection

A

gives you evidence against something

50
Q

Neural network model definition

A

a theory in which concepts (nodes) are linked to other concepts through exciatory and inhibitory connections to approximate the behavior of neural networks in the brain

51
Q

Parts of the neural network model

A

1) nodes
2) pattern of connections
3) activation rule
4) state of activation
5) output functions
6) learning

52
Q

dorsal stream

A

controls object location and spatial attention

53
Q

Ventral stream

A

controls shape orientation and color
- features, lines, edges and shapes

54
Q

Midsection and vertex deletion when embedded in words

A

not as problematic for identification when they are presented within in words (parallel processing means that meaning can inform the missing info)

55
Q

Crowding effects and Dyslexia

A
  • part of visual integration fields
  • conditions: spaced out text vs. normal/ “crowded” text – measured accuracy
  • findings: people with dyslexia had easier time reading with spaced words
56
Q

Goal of studying attention

A

understand what is selected, how is it selected, and what happens to selected/unselected information

57
Q

selection definition

A

you have many stimuli in your perception at all times - have to select a subset of them to process further

58
Q

Overt attention

A

actually moving eyes of head

59
Q

Covert attention

A

moving attention without any overt physical movements

60
Q

Posner cueing paradigm

A

task: press a button when you see an object appear
manipulation: was it precued and was the cue valid (measuring response time)
- valid cue: cue in the same place as target
- invalid cue: have to change attention as you have been directed to the wrong spot
- findings: a valid cue leads to a quicker response time than a neutral and invalid cue (have to reorient attention)

61
Q

Practical implication for posner cueing paradigm

A

texting and driving (anything with divided attention)

62
Q

Are attending and seeing the same (in posner cueing paradigm)

A
  • posner cueing paradigm: eyes remain at fixation yet you still see the cueing effect
  • seems like eye movement is not correlated directly to attention
63
Q

Driving simulator study: attention

A

task: have to move a cursor to follow a path and press break if you see a red light flash
conditions:
- no distraction
- talking on a phone or following a conversation on the radio (dual attention)
- measuring errors in detecting the red lights
findings: talking on the phone increased both the probability of missing the red light AND overall reaction time (radio 2nd then control)

64
Q

Inattention blindness

A

task: have to follow a path in a driving simulator
conditions: billboards are placed along the road and you either have a) no distraction b) talking on the phone or c) listening to the radio
measuring: eye fixations on the billboard in addition to later recognition of the content
findings:
- eye fixations are the same in both conditions (same probability and time)
- BUT recognition of billboard content greatly increased without distraction
- seeing does not equal attention
- cell phone use is the worse because it directs attention from external stimuli to an internal environment

65
Q

How do we study which features we pay attention to?

A

usually with conflict tasks (such as stroop task)

66
Q

Stroop test

A

congruent condition: green in the color green
neutral condition: a random word in the color green
incongruent condition: red in the color green
- these items compete for a response
findings:
- reaction time is longer in the incongruent task if you have to say the COLOR the words is written in (not the words itself) - difference even more severe for old people

67
Q

Evidence for inhibition of unselected information

A

tipper negative priming paradigm: have to respond where a target letter “O” is and ignore where the “X” is
conditions: measuring response time
- control: O is always in a new spot
- attended repetition: O is always in the same spot
- ignored repetition: O is in the spot you just had to ignore
findings:
- you are much slower in ignored repetition - suggests you inhibited this spot below baseline due to the previous presence of an X and then had to take longer to bring it back up to attend to the O (where the X was matters)

68
Q

Filter model

A

attention operated before pattern recognition (semantic understanding) takes place – EARLY SELECTION
- you are completely blocking out one stream of information thus it is lost from sensory store due to decay

69
Q

Evidence for the filter model

A

dichotic listening task: two streams of digits are put into each ear
manipulations: measuring accuracy
- order of recall: in any order or fixed order (had to say right and then left for each trial)
findings:
- the longer the delay between the next set of pairs, the more accurate you are - it is harder to flip back and forth between channels so the more time you are give the better you do

70
Q

Attenuation model

A

attention is still a filter but it doesn’t completely block one stimuli, it just lowers activity for it
- Still a model of EARLY SELECTION

71
Q

How do we test the attenuation model?

A

shadowing task: play two audio messaged and see what gets in from the channel you are not paying attention to

72
Q

Evidence for attenuation model through the shadowing task

A

when you have two streams of audio (one in each ear) and are asked to say what you hear aloud, you sometimes say words from the channel you are not supposed to be paying attention to - it is getting into perception without acutely attending to it
- volume, pitch, intensity and meaning (such as own name) can make you focus on different channels - it passes the threshold and thus is now attended to

72
Q

Evidence for attenuation model through the shadowing task

A

when you have two streams of audio (one in each ear) and are asked to say what you hear aloud, you sometimes say words from the channel you are not supposed to be paying attention to - it is getting into perception without acutely attending to it
- volume, pitch, intensity and meaning (such as own name) can make you focus on different channels - it passes the threshold and thus is now attended to

73
Q

Capacity definition + what effects capacity

A

anything that requires attention competes for capacity
- more difficult tasks require more capacity
- capacity is affected by arousal/ tiredness
- goals and events can affect where attention is allocated
- when capacity does not meet the demands of a task performance declines

74
Q

Late selection models

A

attention operates AFTER pattern recognition / meaning is identified

75
Q

Evidence for limited capacity

A

dual task or divided attention paradigm: vary the demands of the primary tasks and see what it “costs” the secondary task
- Study 1: study pictures and word OR do this plus another task (measuring accuracy) – performance on both decreases when you add another task

76
Q

Evidence for early and late selection related to capacity

A

Main task: shadow one of two information streams
- early selection condition: attend based on voice pitch
- late selection: attend based on meaning of channel
Secondary task: (measuring reaction time)
- monitor for a flash of light and press a button
Findings:
- late selection increased reaction time the most – late selection tasks take more capacity and increase error rate for future memory

77
Q

Multimodal theory

A

people’s intention and task demands determine where in the process information is selected (we can choose this)
- but late selection costs more to system

78
Q

Does everything require capacity?

A

No - automatic processing does not

79
Q

Automatic processes…

A

1) occur without intention
2) do not rise to conscious awareness
3) do not interfere with other mental operations

80
Q

STM definition

A

memory limited in capacity (amount) and duration (how long it lasts)

81
Q

Working memory (WM) definition

A

the use or manipulation of information to accomplish a task

82
Q

Atkinson and Shiffrin model of memory takeaways

A

We have to manipulate information in some way (rehearsal, coding, decisions, retrieval strategies) to keep it in short-term store

83
Q

How fast does forgetting occur?

A

exponential decrease - quick and then levels off
- but overall very quick if not rehearsal (less than 3 seconds)

84
Q

Is forgetting due to decay or interference?

A

Interference (specifically reactive interference)

85
Q

Evidence that forgetting is due to interference

A

Study: present many letters in a sequence and ask to recall a specific one
- decay hypothesis: items presented at a slower rate will forgotten more
- interference hypothesis: fewer interfering items should lead to better recall regardless of presentation rate
findings: more intervening digits, the less you were likely to recall - presentation rate did not matter

86
Q

Reactive interference

A

interference that comes from items encountered AFTER learning

87
Q

proactive interference

A

interference that comes from items that occurs BEFORE learning

88
Q

Release from proactive interference

A

task: participants studied 4 lists - 3 that were similar and a 4th that was distinct in content
- if all lists were similar content, accuracy decreases dramatically cross all trials BUT if the 4th list was distinct, accuracy increased to that of the first list
interference of prior items is greater when you are studying more similar items
- The degree of similarity matters: fruits vs. veggies is less accurate than fruits vs. professions

89
Q

STM capacity

A

7 items plus or minus 2

90
Q

Chunking

A

chunk: a cluster of items that has been stored as a single unit in LTM
-ex: a phone number – better remembered if you can tag the chunks and relate them to something meaningful to you

91
Q

Expertise and STM

A

if you are more experienced at something (such as chess) you are more likely to remember information about it in STM (chess experts can better recall the pieces on a board)

92
Q

How do we search through STM?

A

Serial exhaustive search

93
Q

Evidence for serial exhaustive searching in STM

A

task: study items and at the end, asked if you saw a probe item
- if we complete an exhaustive search, reaction time should increase with the number of items (as there is more to search through) and should be the same whether the answer is yes (positive) or no (negative)
- if we complete a self terminating search positive answers should be quicker than negative answer as we stop when we see it
findings:
- positive and negative searches take the same time and increase with list length: serial and exhaustive processing