cognitive interviews and ethical interview techniques Flashcards
cognitive interview
method of interviewing eyewitnesses the aim is to help witnesses procedure more accurate recall of a crime scene using techniques based on psychological research
ethical interview
method of interviewing that acknowledges that suspects are human beings and are more likely to co-operate with police if rapport is established and they are treated with respect
process of standard interviews
orientation- purpose and legal req
listening- free recall
questions and answers- specific based on prev stage
advice- informed of further action
criticism of standard interviews
ineffective, leading questions with witnesses interrupted for example baldwin found they used coercion and oppressive interviewing causing miscarriages of justice
PACE police and criminal evidence act - ethical code of conduct and legal framework to protect human rights
ethical issues associated with research method
what police do in interviewing
what the PEACE model is
planning and preperation- clear objectives
engage and explain- est rapport
account- open ended q
closure- understand what happened during the interview
evaluate- reflection on the interviewers performance
s of PEACE model
walsh and milne 2010 found evidence that PEACE model builds rapport and used more ethical techniques compared to others and builds public confidencew
w of PEACE model
not always used consistently, expensive
who dev cognitive interview and why
geiselman et al - more effective interviewing
memory principles for CI application
reporting everything and reinstating context- based on tulving encoding , idea when an event is encoded then cues are as well
reverse the order and change perspective- based on schema memory is based on what we expect to happen rather what did
what was bartlett say memory prone is to
distortion,rationalisation,transformation,simplication
4 main techniques used in CI
context reinstatement, report everything, change the order in which the event is recalled, change perspective
describe geiselman et al
lab exp comparing 3 diff interview techniques optimising eyewitness memory performance, 89 undergrads watched a violent film and asked q. increase in n.o of correct items recalled using CI AND CONFABULATED ITEMS NOT SIG, increase in retrieval due to guided approach although ppt recalled more info not accurate and cog elicited more correct items
evidence to support of CI
fisher et al- miami police dept 46% increease in recall over standard interviews with 90% accuracy which increases ecological validity also uses framework which allows others to follow it increasing reliability
holliday showed children aged 5-9 a vid of childs bday party and interviewed them using CI and SI and CI yielded more correct detials on video
milne and bull- used in combination cognitive reinstatement and report everything was more effective
evidence against CI
time consuming and req specialist training- necessary to reduce errors
geiselman children under 6 CI recall down and should be used for age 8 and over as instructions can be confusing
kohnken et al 81% of reccorect info using CI but 61% in incorrect info compared to SI