Cognitive Interview Flashcards

1
Q

What is the cognitive interview?

A

A technique developed by Fisher and Geiselman (1992) and is based on Tulving’s (1994) theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Tulving’s (1994) theory?

A

There are several retrieval paths to each memory, meaning memory not available through one pathway may be available through another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the stages of the cognitive interview?

A
  • Change the narrative order.
  • Change of perspective.
  • Mental reinstatement of the context.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is involved in changing the narrative order?

A

An individual will recall the event in different chronological orders, such as from the end to the beginning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is involved in changing the perspective?

A

An individual will recall the event from the perspective of another individual who was present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is involved in the mental reinstatement of the context?

A

An individual will recall not only the environment context but also the emotional aspect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are examples of mental reinstatement of the context?

A
  • The weather on the day.
  • How the individual was feeling.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the implications of the cognitive interview?

A
  • Interviewees are encouraged to recall all information, disregarding if they deem it irrelevant or trivial.
  • The change of narrative order and perspective reduce witnesses’ use of prior knowledge expectations and prevent the triggering of schema that could encourage the use of stereotyping.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the research findings on the cognitive interview?

A
  • Geiselman et al. (1985) found it produced more accurate and detailed memories than standard police interviews.
  • Geiselman and Fisher (1997) found increased effectiveness when it was used within a short time following the event.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was carried out in Kohnken et al. (1999)?

A

A meta-analysis of 55 studies comparing the cognitive interview to the standard policing interviews.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was found in Kohnken et al. (1999)?

A
  • The cognitive interview resulted in both more accurate detail and more inaccurate detail.
  • There was differences in the age of the witnesses.
  • When the witness was personally involved recall was enhanced.
  • The amount of correct details declined the longer after the event the interview was concluded.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the key features of the enhanced cognitive interview?

A
  • No distractions, unnecessary interruptions or questions.
  • The flow of information is controlled by the witness.
  • Open-ended questions are used.
  • Witnesses speak slowly.
  • Witnesses are reminded not to guess and reply with “don’t know” instead.
  • An interviewer is present to help reduce any anxiety a witness may have.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the stages of the enhanced cognitive interview?

A
  • The interviewer encourages the witness to control the flow of information by asking open-ended questions on a neutral topic.
  • There’s a context reinstatement that’s followed by witnesses’ free recall of events.
  • The interviewer stresses the importance of reporting everything and not guessing unknown details.
  • The interviewer asks about the information using focused memory techniques.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What modifications did Holliday (2003) make to the enhanced cognitive interview?

A
  • Emphasised the building of trust between the interviewer and witness.
  • Removed the changing of perspective stage due to concerns that children would find this too difficult.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the research findings on the enhanced cognitive interview?

A
  • Fisher et al. (1999) found that the enhanced cognitive interview produced superior results compared to the standard police interview.
  • Coker (2013) found that the enhanced cognitive interview produced more accurate details than the standard cognitive interview.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a strength of the cognitive interview?

A
  • It’s highly successful and has been used beyond the realm of police interviews.
17
Q

What are the limitations of the cognitive interview?

A
  • Comparison between the cognitive interview and the standard police interview is difficult because there is no agreed upon format for a police interview.
  • It’s very time consuming and no always appropriate or possible.
  • Not generally effective when witnesses are asked to identify a suspect from a photograph.
18
Q

What was the method in Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) laboratory test?

A
  • 240 participants watched a video of a store robbery.
  • 120 participants were interviewed using the standard police interview.
  • 120 participants were interviewed using the cognitive interview.
19
Q

What were the results in Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) laboratory test?

A
  • Participants who were interviewed using the cognitive interview recalled 35% more facts.
20
Q

What was concluded in Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) laboratory test?

A
  • The cognitive interview is a more effective method of interviewing witnesses than the standard police interview.
21
Q

What are the strengths of Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) laboratory test?

A
  • Provided evidence to support the cognitive interview.
  • Highly controlled and thus easy to replicate.
22
Q

What is a limitation of Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) laboratory test?

A
  • It lacks ecological validity due to the participants not being real crime witnesses.
23
Q

What was the method in Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) field test?

A
  • Used 16 detective interviews with real witnesses from a robbery division.
  • 7 detectives were trained in the cognitive interview technique.
  • The interviews were recorded and analysed by a team at USC who were blind to the conditions.
  • The information gathered by the two groups was collated.
24
Q

What were the results in Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) field test?

A
  • 63% more information was obtained by the detectives trained in the cognitive interview technique.
25
Q

What was concluded in Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) field test?

A
  • The cognitive interview works as more information is gathered.
26
Q

What are the strengths of Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) field test?

A
  • It has high ecological validity.
  • It has a practical application.
27
Q

What are the limitations of Geiselman and Fisher’s (1985) field test?

A
  • It’s unclear if the 63% more information was useful information.
  • There were individual differences in skill within the detectives carrying out the cognitive interview.