Cognitive Defects following Stroke Flashcards

1
Q

domains affected

A

attention - focus attention, sustained attention, selective attention, divided attention

memory - visual, auditory, WM, episodic, semantic, procedural

EF - initiation, processing speed, problem solving, planning

Perception, Praxis - visuo-spatial, visuo-perceptual, unilateral neglect, inattention, dyspraxia/apraxia, agnosia, prosopagnosia (fusiform face area)

Language - aphasia: Brocca’s, Wernicke’s, transcortical motor/sensory or mixed, conductive, global

  • overlaps between different domains
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

assessments for cognitive impairment

A
  • mini mental state examination (MMSE)
  • montreal cognitive assessment
  • neuropsychological test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

mini mental state examination (MMSE)

A
  • orientation test (patient asked about time or date)
  • registration (naming objects within a picture)
  • attention and calculation (basic arithmetic and spelling tests)
  • recall (recall objects from registration tasks)
  • language (patients asked to draw or name objects, can they follow and comprehend instructions)
  • cognitive deficits (given score out of 30 - 24-30 is quite good) - bigger the score the better
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

strengths of MMSE

A
\+ easy to complete
\+ used widely 
\+ quick 
\+ easy to interpret 
\+ inexpensive 
\+ does not require training
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

limitations of MMSE

A
  • confounded by sociocultural background
  • lacks evaluation of EF
  • lacks sensitivity (few tasks)
  • confounded by age
  • confounded by level of education

IMPROVEMENTS
> addition of other tests improve sensitivity and avoid confounds of age and education level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)

A

Tests visuospatial executive function

  • naming (name objects and animals)
  • memory (lists of words to recall)
  • attention (tap when hearing a letter out of big lists)
  • abstraction (identify similarities and diffrences between 2 objects)
  • language (asked to repeat sentences, give 3 words beginning with p)
  • orientation (patient asked about time or date)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strengths and limitations of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

A

+ more sensitive than MMSE (tests higher level of cognitive function)
+ availability of alternate MoCA (different languages)
+ freely accessible

  • relatively new
  • reliability and validity not thoroughly tested
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Neuropsychological tests

A

Large battery of tests

  • visuospatial memory tests
  • verbal learning tests
  • Wechsler memory scale
  • Delis-Kaplen EF system
  • number and letter sequencing
  • Boston naming test
  • Wechsler adult intelligence scale (IQ)
  • phonemic fluency

limitation - time consuming (especially after stroke - tiredness could cause poor performance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Aphasia therapy

A

aim is to get speech and comprehension back

  • speech and language therapy (specialist working with individual)
  • group therapy (individual forced into group scenario - have to use language)
  • training conversation/communication partners (family members trained to understand them to continue communication)
  • computer based therapy (often involves seeing pictures, hearing words, copying and getting immediate feedback if they’re producing the right words [can be used in homes])
  • constraint-induced therapy (relies on objects or gestures - can become overly reliant - must force them to produce speech)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

unilateral spatial neglect

A

failure to report or respond to stimuli on the opposite side of stroke (contralateral side)
- sensory issue (parietal lobe)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

unilateral spatial neglect assessments

A
  • clock drawing task
  • line bisection task
  • behavioural inattention task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

clock drawing task

A

asked to draw a clock
- all numbers will be written, but half the clock ignored

+ easy to administer
+ can be used with other tasks to gain a more complete picture of cognitive function
+ reliability

  • confounded by age and education level
  • affected by motor coordination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

line bisection task

A

asked to bisect a number of lines in half, if they deviate from the middle = USN

+ simple
+ inexpensive
+ no training

  • lack of sensitivity (cant distinguish between severities)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

behavioural inattention tests (BIT)

A
Wilson et al. (1987)
- conventional section (BITC)
> line crossing
> letter cancellation 
> star cancellation 
> shape copying 
> representational drawing 
- behavioural section (BITB) 
> picture scanning 
> phone dialling 
> menu reading 
> article reading 
> telling and setting the time 
> map navigation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

behavioural inattention test (BIT) strengths and limitations

A

+ comprehensive
+ ecologically valid

  • time consuming
  • expensive (need training)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Remedial treatments for USN

A
  • visual scanning (prompting to look at neglected side)
  • computer based scanning (puzzles and games)
    + administered at home +variable
  • virtual reality therapy
17
Q

compensatory therapies for USN

A

compensate for deficits

  • prism adaptation (specific types of glasses developed to shift visual field)
  • limb activation strategies (on side of neglect can help attenuate)
  • sensory feedback strategies (having visual/auditory feedback encouraging attention to neglected side)
  • eye patching and hemispatial glasses
18
Q

dyspraxia/apraxia

A

motor coordination deficit/problems with organising speech

  • perceptual problem (reduced ability to coordinate or perform/plan specific movements
  • frontal lobe (motor coordination, judgement, inhibition, personality, emotion)
19
Q

assessment of dyspraxia/apraxia

A
based on an elimination method of what its not 
if it isn't:
- comprehension deficit 
- muscle weakness 
- sensory impairment 
- tone of abnormality 
- other movement disorder
20
Q

therapy for dyspraxia/apraxia

A
  • strategy training (occupational therapist giving instructions on how to do things)
  • sensory stimulation (stimulation of nerve cells - limited evidence)
  • proprioceptive stimulation (on functioning side patient does task, then switched to other side - cross communication)
  • cueing verbal and physical prompts (prompting them what to do)
21
Q

aphasia

A

loss in the ability to communicate, broken down into two areas

  • Brocca’s area - frontal lobe - speech formation
  • Wernicke’s area - parietal and temporal lobe - comprehension and understanding
  • some can express in different forms (poetry, song)