Cognitive Flashcards
Describe how Cognitive Psychology is an interdisciplinary field
- different questions can be investigated using techniques and perspectives from a variety of disciplines
- draws heavily from a number of different fields
- Linguistics - Psycholinguistics - example of new discipline formed by the marriage of cognitive psychology and linguistics
- Anthropology - cross cultural research examples
- Computer sciene - can develop computational models of general learning principles?
- Development - how children learn language, social structures and interactions with adults and other children
- Neuroscience / Cognitive Neuroscience - as technology (brain imaging techniques) have become more available, theories can be connected to the underlying biology
What is a phoneme?
- the basic unit of spoken language
- the smallest distinctive sound of language
What is a morpheme?
- basic unit of meaning
- smallest distinctive unit of meaning within a language
What is a word?
smallest independent grammatical unit
- can stand alone!
What is syntax?
grammatical rules that govern how we organise words into sentences
What is grammar?
encompasses more grammar and morphology
- examines both word structure and sentence structure
Are phonemes, morphemes and words universal to all languages?
YES
- they are regardless of other features they may or may not have as some languages do have features that others do not use
What is a phrase?
- a string of words that is dependent on a head word
- a noun is usually associated with a noun phrase
- ‘the’ and ‘boy’ = “the boy”, a noun phrase
What is a sentence?
the largest independent language structure
Briefly describe Chomsky’s approach to language
- behaviourist approach
- felt that language abilities must be explained in terms of a complex system of rules and principles that were represented in your mind
- we have these innate language skills
- modular - felt that we had a set of specific linguistic abilities that are separate from other cognitive abilities like memory
Briefly describe the Standard Cognitive Approach to language
- language is not modular
- it is interconnected with other cognitive processes, such as working memory
- according to this approach, we are skilled at language because our powerful brains can master many cognitive tasks
- language is just one of these cognitive tasks and it has the same status as other tasks such as problem solving and memory
Briefly describe the Cognitive-Fucntional Approach to language
- emphasises that the function of human language in everyday life is to communicate meaning to other individuals
- also emphasises that our cognitive processes (like attention and memory) are intertwined with language comprehension and production
Chomsky - sentences
deep structure of sentence = the underlying, more abstract meaning of the sentence
surface structure = represented by the words that are spoken and written into a surface structure that they can speak or write
- people use transformational rules to try and convert deep structure
- two sentences may have the same deep S but a different surface structure - ‘Sara threw the ball’ and ‘the ball was thrown by Sara’
- english speakers know ‘deep down’ that the sentences have identical core meanings (Harley 2008)
Reactions to Chomsky’s theory
- initially was well accepted by many psychologists
- but some of the research did not support his theories
- e.g. did not support his prediction that people would take longer to process sentences that required multiple trasnfromations
- also he argued that all languages share the same universal patterns of grammar however research has shown that many non-European languages do not show these patterns
- many psycholinguistics became discouraged with the emphasis on language structure and became more focused on the human mind and the semantics so developed theories based on meaning - cognitive functional approach
Describe Tomasello’s (1998) contributions to language
- young children have extremely powerful cognitive skills and social-learning skills
- during the years in which they are developing and mastering language, they will hear several million adult sentences
- they can analyse these and adopt flexible strategies to create increasingly complex language
- adults also use language strategically
- we use it to focus and order our listener’s attention onto the information we want to emphasise
What is the ‘Good-Enough’ Approach to language?
- we frequently process only part of a sentence
What are phonemes?
- the sounds / phones used in language
What is phonemic variation?
- when there is meaning attached to the variation
- meaningful variation
- e.g. voicing - whether the vocal chords are vibrating or not
- say sip - voicing is off - feel vibrations in your vocal chords halfway through saying the word
- say zip - voicing is on - can feel vibrations in your vocal chords at the very beginning of the word
What is allophonic variation?
- non-meaningul variation
e. g. saying cats and dogs
- cats - voicing is off in the final position
- dogs - voicing is on all the way through
- the ‘s’ at the end does not change, it represents the same thing of being plural
Describe morphemes
- smallest unit of language that can carry meaning
- the little building blocks of language
- individual words can be morphemes or you can have morphemes that attach to words as they can’t stand on their own
- eg ‘play’ + ‘er’ = player
root word -> attach a morpheme = becomes a verb!
can be done in a variety of ways - can attach more than 2 morphemes and can make it into past tense
Linguistic Knowledge
- speech is continuous (for the most parts)
- we don’t really pause between words in a sentence, although we do sometimes have that illusion that words are discrete so there must be boundaries between them
(eg ‘grade A’ vs ‘grey day’) - no two speakers every say the same thing identically (rate, pitch, volume, tempo differences)
- speakers of foreign languages - seems to us as if they run all of their words together
- the physical utterance of a sentence shows that there are no boundaries between words - no physical cues to tell you where one word stops and the next begins
Briefly describe the human vocal tract
- has hundreds of muscles which operate different parts of the tongue at the same time
- tongue itself has lots of different jobs at any one time; controlling air flow, the volume that opens in the mouth, the jaws having to move in concert with the tongue, the lips too and the tip of the tongue constantly moving
- hundreds of commands coming from the motor cortex informing the articulators where they need to be at any one time
- fluent speakers - all happens with very little effort?
planning of an utterance, what to say afterwards, articulating them, controlling everything
Language Development in Children - Birth
- even hours after birth, children can distinguish different phonemes, even very close ones from each other
- eg ‘ba’ and ‘fa’ - differ only in one feature
Language Development in Children - 0-6 months
- can distinguish the phonemic variations (not meaningful yet) in all different languages
- all the variations / sounds are available to the child
Language Development in Children - 6-9 months
6 months - seems to be a change in the child’s perception
- begin to focus mostly on meaningful variations
- play with sound - babbling sounds begin to narrow their scope to the ones that are meaningful for that language
Language Development in Children - 12 months
- starting to distinguish between phonemic variations that are relevant to the language
- those that aren’t relevant begin to disappear from their repertoire
Describe the McGurk Effect
- visual cues contribute to speech
- in the illusion, what we see overwrites what we hear
- shows us that what we hear may not always be the truth
- helps us to understand what happens when our senses conflict; depending on the modality provided, some information may combine or override other information
- shows that we are not just using what we hear to interpret language, we also use other cues
- if these cues happen to conflict, the brain loos for a way to resolve that conflict
How do children learn to connect a word with an object or an action in the world?
by using Symbolic Function
Describe briefly the background / details to Symbolic Function
- not just restricted to language - memory and brain too
- plays an important role in our ability to use memory - can perhaps use this to make the link between how the brain supports it to help explain the ways it works in language and memory?
Sinclair (1970)
- demonstrated how symbolic function plays an early role in the development of children going from pre-verbal to verbal actors
How do we use symbolic function?
eg an image of a phone - shared image / picture regardless of how it is said
a picture and a word - two different forms that map onto the same function - they all refer back to the same thing!!!
What actually is symbolic function?
the ability to use symbols to represent or stand for perceived objects and events
How do children start to form symbolic functions?
example with the telephone
- observe the use of them
- don’t know how it works but they will engage in symbolic play
- picks up phone and holds it to face and babble into it - this is what they have seen people doing
different components to this behaviour - things that look similar / have similar features, begin to get aspects of things and pull them all together
How do newborns start symbolic function off then?
one of the main functions of their articulations is to get our attention as they cannot take care of themselves (getting hungry or uncomfortable)
normal response when they are uncomfortable or want something - start to cry!
serves as communication - we don’t get a sense of specific desires, it is more of a generalised response to discomfort, pain or hunger
What is shared reference when it comes to symbolic function?
- crying is communicative, but when there are specific desires, its more complicated
- a communicative function in which the speaker and listener understand that a particular symbol refers to a particular things / goal
- can be really unique, especially between parent and child or sibling
KEY THING - the speaker and listener need to understand that a particular symbol refers to a particular thing or goal
How does a child use symbolic function and shared reference to communicate?
- child - may have heard lots of words but they have not begun to put them all together
- no utterances - just babbling, no speech
SO, they begin to gesture and point
- have pretty good manual controls
- good at manipulating the world with their hands
- learn that people around them respond to things that they do
Describe shared reference and symbolic function over time in a child (between 6-8 months)
6-7 months:
- see something, gesture towards it and point / focus on it
- minder - name or give the object to the baby
- starting to get the links between things
- object is now shared with the naming, its been given a reference
7-8 months:
- shift in this social interaction
- more fluid and dynamic
- points at the object and looks at the minder
- key social link here
- if its something you can give, you name it and give it to the baby
What do pre-lingusitic functions serve as?
in the same ways as the kinds of functions that we have words for
Symbolic Functions - Protodeclarative
- pointing and naming
- pre-verbal
- function of a declarative, i.e. naming
Symbolic Functions - Protoimperative
- desire for something
- demand or request
- want to obtain something but you need help to get it as babies cannot get it themselves
Developmental Milestones - Language
0-1 years
- pre-symbolic gestures come online
- 10/11 months - these become quite fluent
- sets the stage for first words; occur around 12 months give or take
- pre-verbal stage of gesturing - child is trying to put together methods of establishing shared reference
Developmental Milestones - Language
1-2 years
around 12 months - first words
- gradual process at first
- vocabulary grows during the 2nd half of the first year to around 50 items
- rate of learning steadily increases until about 18 months where is dramatically increases (vocabulary burst)
Up until 2 years
- gone from roughly 50 words to 400 words
- qualitative learning - seems to be different in some way after this rapid enhancement in lexicon
20/24 months:
- child add words rapidly as well as combining words begin to start
- begin to combine words in productive, rule-governed kind of ways
Developmental Milestones - Language
2-5 years
- once combinations have begin, syntax (elaborate, complicated and useful structuring of language) begins to flower
- develops rapidly from about 2 years to about 4-5 years (only takes 2/3 years to happen)
- no instructions - getting it all from normal everyday experiences
rapid rate of adding words to vocabulary still happens
Developmental Milestones - Language
5+ years
- really rapid increase in lexicon begins to slow down
- but by this time, the child has around 14,000 words in their vocabulary - probably most of what they need to get through the day
Describe how a child’s pattern of learning language is influential with reference to how language is an important feature to our species
- children - not awake all the time, so probably are learning around 9/10 a day - impressive
- language - different from all other cognitive abilities
- especially due to the rapid and complete acquisition of syntactic structures about about 20 months of age and ending a few years later
- kids do make errors - over-generalisations
- is there some part of language that is hard-wired? is there a specific gene for this?
- or does it all come from our environment?
Describe Hagen’s (1971) research into memory strategies in younger and older children
2 groups - 4-6 years and 7-9 years
- all sat down to do a memory task
- within each group, split into 2 subgroups
- half were asked to name the animals whilst the other half were simply instructed to just look at the animals
- animals were then taken away
later did a recall test:
- young kids - no matter what condition, there was no differences in how many they recalled
- older kids - those who named were better at recalling whilst those who looked were not just the worst, they were overall the worst
What are the implications of Hagen’s (1971) research?
suggests that there is something about this naming function that is available to help older children, but it does not seem to play a role yet with younger kids
- younger kids performed just as well whether they looked or named the animals