COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT Flashcards

1
Q

Who produced the influential theory of cognitive development

A

Jean Piaget (1926,1950)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was Piaget’s contribution to child psychology
(What did he say about how children think)

A

Children do not simply know less than adults do. Children think in entirely different ways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did Piaget divide childhood

A

Into stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does each stage of piagets understanding of childhood represent

A

Development of new ways of thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What two aspects did Piaget look at in children’s learning

A

The role of motivation in development
The question of how knowledge develops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is cognitive development

A

A general term describing the development of all mental processes, in particular thinking, reasoning and our understanding of the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

At what stage of life are psychologists particularly concerned with for cognitive development

A

How it develops through childhood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is cognitive development only important in childhood

A

No
It continues throughout the life span of

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is schema

A

A mental framework of beliefs and expectations that influence cognitive processing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is schema developed

A

From experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to Piaget what is the schema of a newly born child like

A

Children are born with a small number of schema.
Enough to allow them to interact with the world and other people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is one of the new schema developed in infancy

A

Me-schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is stored in me-schema

A

All the child’s knowledge about themselves is recorded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cognitive development involves the construction of progressively ___

A

more detailed schema.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give examples of what schemas can be for
(3)
Name 2 that may develop later in life

A

People, objects, physical actions
Justice and morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does Piaget believe about schema and motivation to learn

A

We are pushed to learn when our existing schema do not allow us to make sense of something new.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the unpleasant sensation called when our existing scheme doesn’t allow us to understand something

A

Disequilibrium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How do we escape disequilibrium

A

We have to adapt to new situations by exploring and developing our understanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the preferred mental state

A

Equilibration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is achieved when we adapt to a new situation by exploring and developing

A

Equilibration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When does Equilibration take place

A

When we have encountered new information and built it into our understanding of a topic, either by assimilating it into an existing schema or accommodating it by forming a new schema.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is Equilibration

A

When everything is balanced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Name the two processes by which adaptation takes place

A

Assimilation
Accommodation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When does assimilation take place

A

A form of learning that takes place when we acquire new information or a more advanced understanding of an object, person or idea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is assimilation

A

New information does not radically change our understanding of the topic.
Equilibration occurs by adding new information to our existing schema’s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

When does accommodation take place

A

A form of learning that takes place when we acquire new information that changes our understanding of a topic.
A response to a dramatically new experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is accommodation

A

Equilibrating by forming one or more new schema and/or radically changing schema in order to deal with the new understanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

what are two strengths of piagets theory

A

The existence of evidence for the individual formation of mental representations.
Real-world application to teaching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Who did research that provided evidence for the individual formation of mental representations

A

Christine Howe et al. (1992)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What was Howes method when investigating the individual formation of mental representations

A

Children aged 9-12 were placed in groups of four to investigate and discuss movement of objects down a slope.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What was Howes findings when investigation the individual formation of mental representations

A

All the children were found to have increased their understanding.
Their understanding had not become more similar, each child had picked up different facts and reached slightly different conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

How did piagets theory change classrooms

A

Rather than children sat silently in rows copying from the board an activity-orientated classroom in which children actively engaged in takes that allowed them to construct their own understandings of the curriculum came into play.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

When did piagets theory influence classrooms

A

1960s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is the counterpoint to piagets influence on modern practice in teaching and learning

A

There is no firm evidence showing that children learn better using discovery learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Who did a recent review on piagets theory and researched what the best method of learning is

A

Ard Lazonder and Ruth Harmsen (2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What did Lazonder and Harmsen conclude in their research on best method of teaching

A

Discovery learning with considerable input from teachers was the most effective way to learn, input from others, not discovery per se, is the crucial element of this effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What is one limitation of piagets theory

A

He underestimated the role of others in learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What was piagets theory on other people within learning

A

They are potential sources of information and learning experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What was piagets overall opinion on learning when it comes to others involvements

A

He saw learning itself as an individual process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Why does piagets view on others roles in learning limit his theory
Who’s theory contradicts piaget’s when it comes to the role of other people

A

It has an incomplete explanation for learning as there is not enough emphasis on the role of other people
Vygotsky’s theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What is the flaw in piaget’s research when it comes to motivation

A

He studied his own children and then those in a university nursery.
Those that are more likely to be motivated to learn the most

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

How many stages of intellectual development did Piaget state

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Name the 4 stages of Piagets stages of intellectual development

A

Sensorimotor stage
Pre-operational stage
Stage of concrete operations
Stage of formal operations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is each stage in piagets stages of intellectual development characterised by

A

A different level of reasoning ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Is the exact age at which children go through the stages the same?
What is the key point of the stages?

A

The exact ages very from child to child.
Key point is that all children develop through the same sequence of stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

At what ages does a child tend to be in the Sensorimotor stage

A

0 - 2 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What does Piaget say about a baby’s early focus

A

It is on physical sensations and on developing some basic physical co-ordination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

How do babies learn

A

Through trial and error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What understanding do babies develop in the first 2 years about people and language

A

Other people are separate objects and they acquire some basic language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

At roughly what age are babies capable of understanding object permanence

A

8 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What is object permanence

A

The ability to realise that an object still exists when it passes out of the visual field.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

What do babies do with an out of sight object prior to 8 months

A

Babies immediately switched their attention away from the object once it was out of sight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

What do babies do with an out of object sight when 8 months or older

A

Continue to look for it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Roughly what ages is the pre-operational stage

A

2 - 7 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What are three characteristic errors in reasoning displayed in the pre-operational stage

A

Conservation
Egocentrism
Class inclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What is conservation

A

The ability to realise that quantity remains the same even when the appearance of an object or group of object changed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

What was the method of piagets number conservation experiment

A

Placed two rows of eight identical counters side by side.
Got children to state if the two row of counters had the same number or not.
Pushed the counters in one row closer together.
Got the children to state again if the two rows of counters and the same number or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

What was piagets findings in his number conservation experiment

A

Even young children correctly reasoned that each row of counters had the same number when spread out.
When one of the rows had the counters closer together, pre-operational children struggled to conserve and said there were fewer counters in that row.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What was the method to piagets liquid conservation experiment

A

Two identical containers with the contents at the same hight were placed side by side.
Asked the children if they had the same volume.
Poured one of the liquids into a taller glass so they weren’t at the same hight.
Asked the children if they had the same volume.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

What was the findings to piagets liquid conservation procedure

A

Most children spotted the containers had the same volume of liquid when placed in identical containers side by side with the contents at the same height.
When one liquid was in a taller container with its contents higher than the other younger children believed there was more liquid in the taller vessel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

What is egocentrism
Is it physical or emotional

A

A child’s tendency to only be able to see the world from their own point of view.
Applies to both physical objects and arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Who did Piaget work with on the three mountain task when looking into egocentrism

A

Barbel Inhelder (1956)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

What was the method for the three mountain task

A

Children were shown three model mountains, each with a different feature (a cross, house or snow).
A doll was placed at the side of the model so that it faced the scene from a different angle.
The child was asked to choose what the doll would see from a range of pictures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

What was the results of the three mountain task

A

Pre-operational children tended to find it difficult and often chose the picture that matched the scene from their own point of view.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

What is class inclusion

A

An advanced classification skill in which we recognise that classes of objects have subjects and are themselves subsets of larger classes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

Give an example of what most pre-operational children could classify

A

Pugs, bull terriers and retrievers as dogs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

What was Paiget and Inhelders method for investigating class inclusion

A

Showed 7-8 year-old children pictures of 5 dogs and 2 cats and asked ‘are there more dogs or animals?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

What were the results of piaget and inhelders investigation into class inclusion
Explain

A

Children under 7 struggle with more advanced skill of class inclusion.
Children respond that there were more dogs than animals.
Younger children cannot simultaneously see a dog as a member of the dog class and the animal class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

At roughly what age is the stage of concrete operations experienced

A

7 - 11 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

What did Piaget call externally-verifiable reasoning abilities

A

Operations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

What could children 7 -11 now do

A

Conserve and perform much better on tasks of egocentrism and class inclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

What do children in the concrete operations stage struggle with

A

Struggle to reason about abstract ideas and to imagine objects or situations they cannot see.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

What are concrete operations

A

Operations that can only be applied to physical objects or situations they can see

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Who can complete concrete operations

A

Children 7 or older

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

What age is the stage of formal operations reached

A

11 and above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

What are children able to do from 11+

A

Become able to focus on the form of an argument and not be distracted by its content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

Who investigated arguments and their contents in children

A

Smith et al. (1998)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

What was Smith’s method for investigating formal operations

A

Gave the statement ‘all yellow cats have two heads. I have a yellow cat called Charlie. How many heads does Charlie have?’
Then recorded children responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

What did paiget find in his research on formal operations

A

That younger children became distracted by the content and answered that cats don’t really have two heads.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

What type of test is Smiths question for formal operations
What is another method of testing

A

A syllogisms
The pendulum task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

What did Piaget believe a child could do after being able to reason formally

A

They are capable of scientific reasoning and become able to appreciate abstract ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

What’s are the three major flaws in piagets conclusions in his stages of intellectual development

A

Research for conservation was flawed
Findings on class inclusions are contradicted by newer reserach
Lack of support for piaget’s view of egocentrism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

What was the flaw in piagets experiments for conservation

A

Children may have been influenced by seeing the experimenter change the appearance of the counters or liquids.
Why would the researcher change the appearance and then ask if it was the same?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

Who did further research into conservation in young children

A

James McGarrigle and Margaret Donaldson (1974)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

What was McGarrigle and Donaldson’s method when researching conservation in children.

A

They replicated the counter task with 4-6 yr old children.
They replicated the task again but this time a ‘naughty teddy’ appeared and knocked the counters closer together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

What was McGarrigle and Donaldsons findings when they repeated the counter task for investigating conservation

A

When they repeated piagets method exactly they found that most children answered incorrectly.
When the ‘naughty teddy’ knocked the counters closer together 72% now correctly said there were the same number of counters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

What does McGarrigle and Donaldson’s findings suggest about piagets theory and flaws in his method

A

Children could conserve if they were not put off by the way they were questioned.
Piaget was wrong about the age at which conservation appears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
88
Q

Who conducted newer research into class inclusion

A

Robert Siegler and Matija Svetina (2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
89
Q

What was Siegler and Svetina’s method when investigating class inclusion

A

They gave 100 5 yr olds from Slovenia ten class-inclusion tasks, recieveing an explanation of the task after each session.

One group was told that there must be more animals than dogs because there were 9 animas and 6 dogs.
Another group was told there must be more animals because dogs are a subset of animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
90
Q

What was Siegler and Svetina’s findings when investigating class inclusion
What does this prove

A

The group that had subsets explained to them improved across the sessions more than the other.
Children can acquire an understanding if class inclusion at ages 4-6 contradicting Piaget.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
91
Q

Who completed research on egocentrism after piaget

A

Martin Hughs (1975)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
92
Q

What was Hughes’s method when testing egocentrism

A

He tested the ability of children to see a situation from two people’s viewpoints using a model with two intersecting walls and three dolls. A boy and two police. The children were asked to place the boy doll where the two police dolls couldn’t see it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
93
Q

What was Hughes’s findings from his research on egocentrism

A

Once familiar with the task children as young as 3 1/2 years were able to place the boy doll in the right position with one police doll 90% of the time.
4 year olds could do it 90% of the time with two police dolls present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
94
Q

What did Hughes’s findings on egocentrism suggest

A

When tested with a scenario that makes more sense, children are able to decentre and imagine other perspectives much earlier than Piaget proposed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
95
Q

What is wrong with the arguments against piagets work

A

His core stages remain unchallenged.
Only the methods he used meant the timing of his stages were wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
96
Q

Which Russian psychologist was influenced by piagets work

A

Lev Vygotsky (1934)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
97
Q

What is the major difference between Vygotsky and piagets work

A

Vygotsky saw cognitive development as a social process of learning from more experienced others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
98
Q

What did Vygotsky call the experienced others

A

‘Experts’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
99
Q

What did Vygotsky say knowledge is at first

A

Intermental between the more and less expert individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
100
Q

What did Vygotsky say came after intermental

A

Intamental - within the mind of the less expert individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
101
Q

What did Vygotsky see as much more important in cognitive development than Piaget

A

Language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
102
Q

What impact does culture have on cognitive abilities for the future

A

Children are picking up the mental ‘tools’ that will be most important for life within the physical, social and work environment of their culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
103
Q

What is the zone of proximal development (ZPD)

A

The gap between a child’s current level of development (defined by the cognitive tasks they can perform unaided) and what they can potentially do with the right help form a more expert other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
104
Q

Expert assistance will allow a child to do what?

A

Cross the ZPD and understand as much of a subject or situation as they are capable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
105
Q

What did Vygotsky believe about the impact of learning from others on understanding and reasoning

A

Children develop a more advanced understanding of a situation and hence the more advanced reasoning abilities needed to deal with it by learning from others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
106
Q

What did Vygotsky believe about how higher mental functions could be aquired

A

Believed they could only be acquired through interaction with more advanced others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
107
Q

What does the term scaffolding mean

A

The process of helping a learner cross the zone of proximal development and advance as much as they can, given their stage of development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
108
Q

What happens to the level of help in scaffolding as a learner crosses the ZPD

A

The level of help given in scaffolding declines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
109
Q

Who suggested much of what we know about scaffolding

A

Jerome Bruner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
110
Q

What is the approach with scaffolding often called

A

The Vygotsky-Bruner model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
111
Q

Who noted the particular stratergies that experts use when scaffolding

A

David Wood, Jermaine Burner and Gail Ross (1976)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
112
Q

The level of scaffolding declines from what level to what level

A

5 to 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
113
Q

Name the 5 levels of scaffolding in order with numbers

A
  1. Demonstration
  2. Preparation for child
  3. Indication of materials
  4. Specific verbal instructions
  5. General prompts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
114
Q

As a child grasps a task what happens to the levels and the expert

A

The level declines
The expert withdraws the level of help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
115
Q

What are the three strengths of Vygotsky’s theory

A

Research support for the ZPD
Research support for scaffolding
Real-world and practical application in education

116
Q

Who conducted a study for support for ZPD

A

Antonio Roazzi and Peter Bryant (1998)

117
Q

What was Roazzi and Bryant’s method when investigating ZPD

A

They gave children aged 4-5 years the task of estimating the number of sweets in a box.
In one condition children worked alone in another they worked with the help of an older child through prompts.

118
Q

What were the findings of Roazzi and Bryant when investigating ZPD

A

Most children working alone failed to give a good estimate.
In the expert help group the 4-5 year olds receiving the help successfully mastered the task.

119
Q

Who’s research showed that the expert’s level of help declines during the process of learning

A

David Conner and David Cross (2003)

120
Q

How did Conner and Cross investigate the decline in help during scaffolding

A

Used a longitudinal procedure to follow up 45 children, observing them engaged in problem-solving tasks with the help of their mothers at 16, 26, 44 and 54 months.
Distinctive changes in help were observed overtime.

121
Q

What did Conner and Cross observe in their investigation on scaffolding

A

Mothers used less and less direct intervention and more hints and prompts as children gained experience.
Mothers also increasingly offered help when it was needed rather than constantly.

122
Q

When was Vygotsky’s idea highly influential in education

A

21st century

123
Q

Who investigated the impact of scaffolding from older peers

A

Hilde Van Keer and Jean Pierre Verhaeghe (2005)

124
Q

What did Van Keer and Verhaeghe find out about scaffolding form older peers

A

7 year olds tutored by 10 year olds, in addition to their whole-class teaching progressed further in reading than controls.

125
Q

Who investigated the effect of teaching assistants

A

Alborz et al. (2009)

126
Q

What did Alborz conclude about teaching assistants

A

They are very effective at improving the rate of learning in children.

127
Q

What is the counterpoint to Vygotsky’s theory

A

The application of the role of social interaction may not be universal

128
Q

Who pointed out that ZPD and scaffolding may not be universal

A

Charlotte Liu and Robert Matthew’s (2005)

129
Q

What did Liu and Matthew’s state about Vygotsky’s ideas being universal

A

They pointed out that in China classes of up to 50 children learn very effectively in lecture-style classrooms with very few individual interactions with peers and tutors.
This should not be possible if Vygotsky’s theory is entirely correct.

130
Q

Who suggested that young babies had a better understanding of the physical world than Piaget had suggested

A

Renee Baillargeon

131
Q

What are some example reasons Baillargeon suggested was the case instead to object permanence

A

Young babies could lack the motor skills necessary to pursue a hidden object or they might lose interest as they are easily distracted.

132
Q

Name one of the techniques that Baillargeon developed

A

The Violation of expectation (VOE) method

133
Q

What is a violation of expectation research

A

A method used to investigate infant knowledge of the world.
The idea is that if children understand how the physical world operates then they will expect certain things to happen in particular situations.
If these things do not occur and children show surprise, this suggests that they have an intact knowledge of that aspect of the world.

134
Q

How does Balliargeon explain VEO

A

‘In a typical experiment babies see two test events - an expected event, which is consistent with the expectation examined in the experiment, and an unexpected event, which violates the expectation.’

135
Q

Who did Balliargeon work with to investigate object permanence

A

Marcia Graber (1987)

136
Q

What was the procedure Balliargeon and graber used to investigate object permanency with VOE

A

24 babies aged 5-6 months.
Shown a short and tall rabbit passing behind a screen with a window.

137
Q

What is the familiarisation event in Balliargeon and graber’s method whilst investigating object permanence using VOE

A

A baby is shown a short rabbit disappearing behind a screen and then a tall rabbit disappearing separately.

138
Q

What are the two conditions in Balliargeon and graber’s experiment on object permanence and VOE

A

Expected and unexpected

139
Q

What is the expected event in Balliargeon and graber’s experiment on object permanence and VOE

A

Where a short rabbit passes behind a screen with a window and isnt seen through due to height until it reaches the other end.
Or a tall rabbit does the same but is seen through the screen.

140
Q

What is the unexpected event in Balliargeon and graber’s experiment on object permanence and VOE

A

The tall rabbit passing behind the window is not seen through it as it moves from one side of the screen to the other.

141
Q

What would a baby who has object permanence show in Balliargeon and graber’s experiment

A

Would show surprise when shown the unexpected event

142
Q

What was Balliargeon and graber’s findings when experimenting VOE

A

Babies looked for an average 33.07 seconds at the unexpected event compared to 25.11 seconds at the expected event.

143
Q

What did Balliargeon and graber’s findings suggest about object permanence in 5-6 month olds

A

Surprise shows that they must have known the tall rabbit should have appeared at the window.
Demonstrates a good understanding of object permanence

144
Q

What is Balliargeon and graber’s rabbit study an example of

A

Occlusion study - in which one object occludes another.

145
Q

VOE experiements have also been used to test infants understandings of what other two tings

A

Containment and support

146
Q

What is the idea of containment

A

When an object is seen to enter a container it should still be there when the container is open

147
Q

What is the idea of support

A

An object should fall when unsupported but not when it is on a horizontal surface.

148
Q

What type of events do infants pay attention to more

A

Unexpected

149
Q

Who proposed the idea that humans are born with a physical reasoning system (PRS)

A

Balliargeon et al. (2012)

150
Q

What two things does being born with a physical reasoning system mean

A

We are all born hardwired with both basic understanding of the physical world and also the ability to learn more details easily.

151
Q

What is the development process in Balliargeon’s theory of infant physical reasoning

A

In the first few weeks of life babies begin to identify event categories.
Each event category corresponds to one way is which objects interact.
A baby is born with a basic understanding of object permanence and quickly learns that one object can block the view of another.

152
Q

Why does an unexpected event capture a babies attention in terms of PRS

A

Because the nature of their PRS means they are predisposed to attend to new events that might allow them to develop their understanding of the physical world.

153
Q

What are two strengths of Balliargeon’s research

A

The validity of the VOE method
The ability of her explanation to explain universal understanding of the physical world

154
Q

How does VOE overcome the issue in piagets research of becoming distracted by other visual stimuli

A

‘Distraction’ would not affect outcome.
The only thing being measured is how long the baby looks at the visual scene - looking away is not recorded

155
Q

Why does the VOE method have greater validity than piaget’s

A

A confounding veritable is controlled

156
Q

Who stated a counterpoint to Balliargeon’s VOE method

A

Bremner (2013)

157
Q

What did Bremner state to contradict Balliargeon’s VOE method

A

Piaget pointed out that acting in accordance with a principle is not the same as understanding it.

158
Q

What does understanding something mean?
What does this mean in terms of babies and object permanence

A

Understanding something means it can be thought about consciously and applied to reasoning about different aspects of the world.
Even though babies doe appear to respond this may not represent change in their cognitive abilities.

159
Q

Who made a statement that supports Balliargeon’s theory in its ability to explain universal understanding of the physical world

A

Susan Hespos and Kristy van Marle (2012)

160
Q

What did Hespos and Marle point out about Balliargeon’s theory and its ability to explain universal understanding of the physical world

A

We all have a very good understanding of the basic characteristics of the physical world regardless of culture and personal experience.

161
Q

This universal understanding suggests that a basic understanding of the physical world is ___

A

Innate

162
Q

What would we expect if the basic understanding of the physical world was not innate

A

Significant cultural and individual differences and there is no evidence for these.

163
Q

What does innate basic understanding of the physical world suggest about Balliargeon’s PRS

A

It is correct.

164
Q

What is one limitation of Balliargeon’s research

A

The assumption that response to VOE is linked to unexpectedness and hence object permanence.

165
Q

It can be argued that all VOE shows is that babies find ___

A

Certain events more interesting

166
Q

What is inferred when VOE is used

A

There is a link between this response and object permanence.
It may simply be that one event is more interesting and not unexpected

167
Q

Who investigated how children develop their perspective-taking

A

Robert Selman (1971, 1976)

168
Q

What was selman more specifically interested in

A

Social perspective-taking

169
Q

What does social perspective-taking concern
What else is this called

A

What someone else is feeling or thinking
Social cognition

170
Q

What is social cognition
What are both cognitive processes

A

Described the mental processes we make use of when engaged in social interactions.
Both the understanding and the decision-making are cognitive processes

171
Q

What do we base our decisions on within social cognition

A

On how to behave based on our understanding of a social situation

172
Q

What did Selman propose about social perspective-taking that differed for Piaget
What are these different approaches called.

A

Piaget believed in domain-general cognitive development. Physical and social perspective-taking occur hand-in-hand.
Selman believes that development of social perspective-taking is a separate process. A domain-specific approach.

173
Q

What was Selman method for researching perspective-taking

A

30 boys and 30 girls.
20 4 year-olds, 20 5 year-olds and 20 6 year-olds.
They were asked how a person felt in various scenarios.

174
Q

What was Selman findings when investigating perspective-taking

A

Selman found that the level of perspective-taking correlated with age, suggesting a clear development of sequences.

175
Q

How many stages are in Selman stages of development

A

5

176
Q

Name in order Selman stages of development

A

Stage 0 - Egocentric
Stage 1 - Social-informational
Stage 2 - self-reflective
Stage 3 - Mutual
Stage 4 - Social and conventional system

177
Q

What ages are included in stage 0

A

3 - 6 years

178
Q

What is a child like in the Egocentric stage

A

Cannot reliably distinguish between their own emotions and those of others.
Can generally identify emotional states in others but do not understand what social behaviour might have caused them

179
Q

How old is a child in stage 1

A

6 - 8 years

180
Q

What is a child like in the social-informational stage

A

Can now tell the difference between their own point of view and that of others.
They can usually focus on only one of these perspectives

181
Q

How old is a child in stage 2

A

8 - 10 years old

182
Q

What is a child like in the self-reflective stage

A

Can put themselves in the position of another person and fully appreciate the others perspective.
Can only take on board one point of view at a time.

183
Q

How old is a child in stage 3

A

10 - 12 years old

184
Q

What is a child like in the mutual stage

A

Now able to look at a situation from their own and anothers’ point of view at the same time

185
Q

How old is a child in stage 4

A

12 years +

186
Q

What is a child like in the social and conventional system stage

A

Able to see that sometimes understanding others’ viewpoints is not enough to allow people to reach agreement.
This is hwy social conventions are needed to keep order.

187
Q

What did selman believe that development through the stages are based on

A

Maturity and experience

188
Q

What did Selma recognise about his description of cognitive reasoning

A

It does not fully explain social development

189
Q

Who came up with the three aspects to social development

A

Schultz et al. (2003)

190
Q

What are the three aspects of social development

A

Interpersonal understanding
Interpersonal negotiation stratergies
Awareness of personal meanings of relationships

191
Q

What is interpersonal understanding

A

If we can take different roles then we can understand social situations

192
Q

What is interpersonal negotiation strategies

A

We also have to develop skills in how to respond to what others think in social situations.
We therefore develop social skills such as asserting our position and managing conflict

193
Q

What is awareness of personal meaning of relationships

A

Social development also requires the ability to reflect on social behaviour in the context of different relationships.

194
Q

What are two strengths of Selmans stages

A

Evidence that perspective-taking becomes more advance with age
Support for the importance of perspective-taking in healthy social development

195
Q

In Selmans own research what correlation was found between age and the ability to take different perspectives

A

A significant positive correlation

196
Q

What type of research was Selmans. What new type of research backs up his

A

Cross-sectional
Longitudinal

197
Q

Who conducted a longitudinal study on Selmans stages

A

Gurucharri and Selman 1982

198
Q

What is a longitudinal study
Does it have good or bad validity

A

One that follows the same child throughout age
Good validity as they control for individual differences.

199
Q

Who completed a study in support for the importance of perspective-taking in healthy social development

A

Moniek Buijzen and Patti Valkenburg (2008)

200
Q

What was Buijzen and Valkenburg’s method when investigating the importance of perspective-taking in healthy social development

A

Observational study of child-parent interaction in toy shops and supermarkets.
Observed interactions including those where parents refused to buy things their child wanted.
Any coercive behaviour in the children, which is unhealthy social behaviour was noted

201
Q

What was Buijzen and Valkenburg’s findings when investigating the importance of perspective-taking in healthy social development.

A

Found a negative correlation between coercive behaviour and both age and perspective-taking abilities.

202
Q

Who’s research does not support the links between perspective-taking and social development

A

Luciano Gasser and Monika Keller (2009)

203
Q

What did Gasser and Keller assess in their research on the links between perspective-taking and social development

A

Assessed perspective-taking in bullies, victims and non-participants

204
Q

What was Gasser and Keller’s findings when investigating the link between perspective-taking and social development

A

Bullies displayed no difficulties in perspective-taking

205
Q

What is one limitation of Selman’s stages

A

The focus on cognitive factors alone

206
Q

What does Selmans approach fail to take into account

A

The full range of other factors that impact on a child’s social development.

207
Q

What are other internal factors that impact a child’s social development

A

The development of empathy and emotional self-regulation

208
Q

What are the important external factors selman didn’t include in his research

A

Parenting style, family climate and opportunities to learn from peer interactions.

209
Q

What is perspective-taking

A

Our ability to appreciate a social situation from the perspective of other people.
Underlies much of our normal social interactions.

210
Q

What type of ability is perspective-taking

A

A cognitive ability

211
Q

What is theory of mind (ToM)

A

Our personal understanding of what other people are thinking and feeling.

212
Q

What is used to study ToM at different points in development

A

Different methods

213
Q

How can ToM be assessed in toddlers

A

False belief tasks

214
Q

How can ToM be assessed in older kids and adults

A

Eye tasks

215
Q

Who completed a study on internal reasoning in toddlers

A

Andrew Meltzoff (1988)

216
Q

What was the method for Meltzoff research on intentional reasoning in toddlers

A

Children of 18 months observed adults place beads into a jar.
In the experimental conditions the adults appeared to struggle with this and sone beads fell outside the jar.
In the control conditions the adults paced the beads successfully in the jar.

217
Q

What was Meltzoff’s findings on intestinal reasonings in toddlers

A

In both conditions the toddlers successfully placed the beads in the jar.
Suggests they were imitating what the adults intended to do rather than what the adults actually did.

218
Q

What did Meltzoff prove on intentional reasoning in toddlers

A

Provided convincing evidence that toddlers have an understanding of adult intentions and young children have a simple ToM.

219
Q

Why were false belief tasks developed

A

In order to test whether children can understand that people can believe something that is not true.

220
Q

Who first developed false tasks

A

Heinz Wimmer and Josef Perner (1983)

221
Q

What was the method for Wimmer and Perner’s false belief task

A

They told 3-4 year olds a story in which Maxi left his chocolate in a blue cupboard in the kitchen. Later his mum used some of the chocolate in her cooking and placed the remainder in the green cupboard.
The children were asked where maxi would look for his chocolate when he came back.

222
Q

What was the results in Wimmer and Perners false belief task

A

Most 3 year olds incorrectly said it he would look in the green cupboard
Most 4 year olds correctly said the blue cupboard

223
Q

What does Wimmer and Perner’s false belief task results tell us about age and ToM

A

ToM undergoes a shift and becomes more advance at around 4 years old

224
Q

What is the sally-Anne study

A

Uses the sally-Anne task to assess theory of mind.
To understand the story participants have to identify that sally will look for a marble in teh wrong place because she doesn’t know Anne moved it.

225
Q

What type of task is the sally-Anne task

A

A false belief task

226
Q

Who used and named the sally-Anne task

A

Simon Baron-Cohen et al. (1985)

227
Q

Baron-Cohen has explored the links between ToM and what disability

A

Autism

228
Q

What is autism

A

A board term for a spectrum of features. Autistic people face challenges with social interactions / communication and repetitive / restrictive behaviours.

229
Q

What does autism being a spectrum condition tell us

A

Autism affects people in different ways.

230
Q

What does autism co-occur with

A

Learning disabilities

231
Q

What was the procedure Baron-Cohen used to investigate ToM and autism

A

The sally-Anne task was given individually to 20 autistic children, 27 non-autistic children and 14 children with Down syndrome (control groups)

232
Q

What was Baron-Cohen’s findings when investigating ToM and Autism

A

85% of children in the control groups correctly identified where sally would look.
Only four of the autistic children (20%) were able to answer.

233
Q

What did Baron-Cohen argue his findings proved about autism

A

Showed autism involves a ToM deficit and that this may in fact be a complete explanation for autism.

234
Q

What did studies of older autistic children and autistic adults without a learning disability show?
What did this disprove?

A

That people with autism can succeed on false belief tasks.
The idea that autism can be explained by ToM deficits

235
Q

What did Baron-Cohen and colleagues develop to assess ToM in adolescents and adults

A

The Eye Task

236
Q

What is the eye task

A

Reading complex emotions in pictures just showing a small area around the eyes of a face.

237
Q

What was Baron-Cohen findings on ToM and autism in adults through using the eye task
What did this prove

A

Found that many autistic adults without a learning disability struggled with the eyes task.
Reconfirmed the idea that ToM deficits might be a cause of autism

238
Q

What year did Baren-Cohen conduct his eye task on adults with autism

A

1997

239
Q

What are two limitations of ToM research

A

ToM research has been the reliant on false belief tasks to test theories
Research techniques fail to distinguish ToM from perspective-taking

240
Q

Who researched the validity of false belief tasks

A

Bloom and German (2000)

241
Q

What did Bloom and German say about the reliability of false belief tasks

A

They may have some serious problems with validity

242
Q

What is one reason for false belief tasks having problems of validity

A

They require other cognitive abilities such as visual memory.
This means failure on a false belief task may be due to deficit in memory rather than ToM.

243
Q

What can some children successfully take part in which requires some ToM ability but find false belief tasks difficult
What does this mean about false belief tasks and ToM research

A

Pretend play
False belief tasks may not really measure ToM ad therefore ToM lacks key research.

244
Q

What is the relationship between perspective-taking and ToM

A

They are related but are two different cognitive abilities

245
Q

What does the relationship between perspective-taking and ToM mean about experiments

A

Have to be careful that the chose one is being measured and not the other

246
Q

What is one strength of ToM research

A

Its application to understanding autism

247
Q

What does the results of autistic people and ToM research reflect in the characteristics of autism

A

Some autistic people may find social interaction difficult.
It is hard to interact with someone if you dont get a sense of what they are thinking.

248
Q

What is a counterpoint to the link between ToM and autism

A

ToM doesn’t provide a complete explanation for autism as not every autistic person experiences ToM problems.

249
Q

What does Josef Perner et al (2002) suggest about ToM development
Who’s beliefs do these align with more

A

It is an innate ability which develops alongside other cognitive abilities, largely as a result of maturing
Piagets

250
Q

What does Janet Wilde Astington suggest about the development of ToM
Who’s beliefs do they align with more

A

Tom develops as a consequence of our interactions with others, and gradually the concept of ToM is internalised.
Vygotsky’s

251
Q

What is the mirror neuron system

A

Consists of special brain cells-called mirror neurons distributed in several areas of the brain.
Mirror neurons are unique because they fire both in response to personal action and in response to action on the part of others.

252
Q

What may the mirror neurons be involved in
What May they allow us to do

A

Social cognition
Allow us to interpret intention and emotion in others

253
Q

Who discovered mirror neurones by accident

A

Giacomo Rizzolatti et al. (2002)

254
Q

How did Rizzolatti discover mirror neurons

A

We’re studying electrical activity in a monkey’s motor cortex.
A researcher reached for his lunch in front of the monkey.
The monkey’s motor cortex became activated in the same way as it did when it was reaching for the food itself.

255
Q

Why are they named mirror neurons

A

Because they mirror motor activity in another individual.

256
Q

Who suggested a link between intentions and mirror neurons

A

Victoria Gallese and Alvin Goldman (1998)

257
Q

What did Gallese and Alvin suggest about mirror neurons and interactions

A

Mirror neurons respond not just to observed actions but to intentions behind behaviour.
We stimulate others actions in our motor system and experience their intentions using mirror neurons.

258
Q

What is the suggested link between mirror neurons and ToM or perspective -taking

A

If mirror neurons fire in response to others actions and intentions this may give us a neural mechanism for experiencing, and understanding other peoples perspectives and emotional states.

259
Q

Who suggested a link between mirror neurons and human evolution

A

Vilayanur Ramachandran (2011)

260
Q

What did Ramachandran suggest about mirror neurons and human evolution

A

Mirror neurons have effectively shaped human evolution.
They are key to understanding why we have developed as a social species

261
Q

What is the link between cognitive social abilities show and the way we live / our culture - mirror neurons and evolution

A

Without the cognitive social abilities we could not live in large groups with the complex social roles and rules that characterise human culture.

262
Q

Why did research into the link between mirror neurons and autism

A

Ramachandran and Lindsay Oberman (2006)

263
Q

What theory did Ramachandran and Oberman propose

A

The ‘broken mirror’ theory of autism

264
Q

What is the ‘broken mirror’ theory of autism

A

The idea that neurological deficits including dysfunction of the mirror neurons system prevent a developing child from imitating and understanding social behaviours in others. Which are symptoms of autism.

265
Q

What are two strengths for mirrors neurons

A

The existence of supporting evidence
Support for explaining autism

266
Q

Who provided evidence supporting a role for mirror neurons in a range of human behaviours - yawning

A

Helene Haker et al (2012)

267
Q

What was the method used by Haker to research mirror neurons and their use in human behaviours

A

Scanned the brains of people as they watched a film of people yawning.

268
Q

What was Haker’s findings when investigating the link between mirror neurons and human behaviours
(What part of the brain)

A

Levels of activity in Brodmann’s Area 9 - believed to be rich with mirror neurons - increased when participants yawned in response.

269
Q

What is contagious yawning believed to be the result of?
What does this mean via Harkers results - yawning

A

A result of empathy
The study links mirror neuron activity to empathy

270
Q

Who researched the link between mirror neurons and intentions - cup

A

Marco Lacoboni et al (2005)

271
Q

What was Lacobonis research method when trying to study mirror neurons and intentions

A

Looked at brain activity whilst a participant tried to understand a hand-grasping gesture
E.g. picking up a cup of

272
Q

What was Lacobonis findings when investigating the link between mirror neurons and intentions

A

Activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (rich with mirror neurons) increased significantly when the participants tried to understand the intentions behind the hand-grasping gesture

273
Q

What did Lacoboni’s results suggest about the link between mirror neurons and an action taking place infront of you

A

Mirror neurons encoded why an object was being grasped (intentions)

274
Q

Who conducted research into the link between autism and mirror neurons (broken mirror theory)

A

Hadjikhani (2007)

275
Q

What did Hadjikani find in brain scans?
What was the link made with autism?

A

Smaller average thickness of the pars operccularis in autistic people
This is an area thought to be rich with mirror neurons and thought to be involved in perspective-taking

276
Q

What has research focused on scanning methods shown about the ‘broken mirror’ theory and autism

A

Lower activity level sin regions of the brain believed to be associated with high concentrations of mirror neurons in autistic people.

277
Q

Who’s research is a counterpoint to the strength of mirror neurons explaining autism h

A

Antonia Hamilton (2013)

278
Q

What was involved in Hamilton’s research for a counterpoint against the link between mirror neurons and autism

A

Conducted a systematic review of 25 studies

279
Q

What was Hamilton’s opposing conclusion on the link between mirror neurons and autism

A

Evidence was highly inconsistent and results hard to interpret.
May not be a link at all.

280
Q

What is a limitation to the research method for mirror neurons?
Is this ethical on humans?
Are animal studies reliable?

A

To measure neuron activity electrodes have to be implanted in the brain.
Ethically impossible to do this in humans and animal studies tell little about human cognition.

281
Q

What is an alternative method to measure neuron activity rather than implanting electrodes

A

Scanning techniques

282
Q

What is the limitations of using scanning techniques over implanting electrodes

A

Only measure activity in brain areas not individual cells.

283
Q

Who said there is no ‘gold standard’ for measuring mirror neurons activity in humans.

A

Bekkali et al (2019)

284
Q

What did Bekkali state about measuring neuron activity and evidence for mirror neuron activity in humans

A

There is no ‘gold standard’ for measuring mirror neuron activity in humans
No direct evidence for mirror neuron activity in humans.

285
Q

Mirror neurons are believed to be what type of cell

A

Motor neurons