Cog Psy Exam #3 (3/15/24) Flashcards
knowledge representation: definitions
process - what the mind does (attention, encoding, retrieval)
product - consequences of processes (recall, comprehension, primed responses)
knowledge representation
- what processes operate on
- what products are derived from
- ‘stand in for’ something else
- capture important aspects of information not everything about them
knowledge representation: external vs internal representation
external
- subway map
- street signs
internal
- brain states: neural activity
- theoretical structures (mental images, conceptual nodes, schemas)
imagistic: mental imagery
- direct, analogous to the thing you have a mental representation of
- preserves visuospatial relations, maintains the same physical features
imagistic: mental rotation studies (Shepard & Metzler)
- ask people to think about something and imagine turning it upside down in your head
- takes people longer to rotate it upside down than to turn it to the side = shorter rotation
results: the amount of time taken to decide whether the objects are the same is a function of the amount of rotation required
imagistic: image scanning (Kosslyn - elephant/cat)
- imagine an elephant, in the same scene imagine a cat
- verifying question: does the cat have ears?
- takes people longer th answer things about a cat next to elephant bc of size diff
results: faster to verify details that are larger in the overall image
imagistic: image scanning (Kosslyn - Island)
- after memorizing map of made up island, people were asked to imagine mentally traveling on the map
- people took longer to mentally travel for longer distances on the map
- people maintain features of the actual physical environment
imagistic: relational-organizational hypothesis (Bower)
- imagery improves memory when it affords associations btw stimuli
- look at words and memorize them
- give recognition test
- in recall: when asked for
- rote memorization = 30%
- separate images = 47%
- interacting images = 57%
results: people remember more by using imagistic representations
dual coding: memorize word pair study
words
- carrot/truck
- table/justice
- wisdom/flower
- integrity/socialism
Results: easier to make mental images for certain words (carrot vs socialism) and therefore pairs that are easier are easier to remember
dual code theory
- two ways to represent concepts
- sometimes things are imagistic and sometimes they are verbal
- if you encode things in 2 diff formates you facilitate memory and are more likely to remember more
verbal representation
- symbolic representation
- words
abstract (propositional) representation
- things we can’t define
- coding in a computer or neuros firing
abstract representation: propositional (Anderson & Bower)
- symbolic things that can’t be translated but conveys relationships
- info is stored as ‘propositions’
- relationship btw ideas
- propositional representations are retrieved and image or verbal code is recreated
image vs proposition
- analog: preserves perceptual features
- relationship must be encoded in the representation
- lamp is ON the table
spatial knowledge: mental models (Johnson-Laird)
- running simulations of what might happen at the end of the movie
- can infer info through a mental model
- making judgements
study: cup in relation to knife situation
spatial knowledge: cognitive maps
specialized representations of physical environments
spatial knowledge: route knowledge
navigating through environment, series of landmarks
spatial knowledge: survey knowledge
- bird’s eye view
- can be learned through maps but takes a while
- acquire with expensive experience
spatial knowledge: physical vs mental maps (Tversky)
- conceptual knowledge can distort perceptual representations
spatial knowledge: map memorization study (Throndyke)
- memorized maps w 4 made up cities
- asked people to estimate distance btw cities
Results: if there were no intervening cities btw the 2 points they estimated shorter distances
embodied accounts - carpenter nail study
- based on the way we interact with things
- ppl read a sentence and then shown a picture and asked if it was an object in the sentence
Results: ppl were faster to say yes to the pictures in the same orientation as they wld be irl
- horizontal nails vs vertical bc that’s how it wld be hammered into a wall
action compatibility effect (Kaschak & Glenberg)
- move mouse to give a response, read sentence to see if it makes sense
2 groups: forward or back to say yes
sentence: you gave the friend the food
results: people are faster when moving forward with this sentence bc to give something you would hand it out
concepts and categories
- how knowledge is stored in the mind: representation and organization
- concept: knowledge one has about specific things in the word
- types of categories
- natural kinds
- artifact
- ad hoc: created ‘on the spot’ to suit a specific need
categorization accounts: function of rules
- item belongs to a category if defining features are present
- categories are at times related by family resemblance, not rules or def
- some categories are malleable or fuzzy