Coding, Capacity and Duration of Memory Flashcards
Coding
Format in which info is stored in each memory store
Baddley (coding)
Gave 4 groups lists to remember: acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar, semantically dissimilar.
Findings: More mistakes when recalling acoustically-similar words straight after learning them. More mistakes recalling semantically similar words after 20 minutes.
Capacity
Amount of info which can be kept in a memory store
Jacobs (capacity)
Read out 4 digits and if correct, read out 5 and so on until you make a mistake.
Findings: digits is 9.3 and letters is 7.3.
Miller (capacity)
Said that every thing comes in 7s: 7 deadly sins. So STM capacity is 7+-2. Also said chunking can help us recall info
Duration
Amount of time that info can be kept in a memory store
Peterson et al (duration)
Tested 24 undergraduate students. Each student had 8 trials. Each trial was given consonant syllable and 3 digit no. to count back in threes (preventing mental rehearsal). Told to stop after 3,6,9,12,18 secs.
Findings: More correct responses when retention interval was short
Bahrick et al (duration)
Studied 392 participants aged between 17-74 in Ohio. High school yearbooks. Two tests: 1)photo recognition and 2)recall all the names of their graduating class
Findings: 15 years after graduation = 90% accurate in test 1. 48 years after = 70% accurate in test 1. 15 years after = 60% accurate in test 2. 48 years after = 30% accurate in test 2.
Coding Capacity Duration of STM and LTM
STM LTM
Acoustic Semantic
7+-2 Unlimited
18-30 secs Unlimited
Strengths
Bahrick et al’s 1975 study used meaningful stimuli. This suggests that the findings have high ecological
validity because they can be easily generalised to real-life, due to the stimuli reflecting those which
we would often try to learn and recall in our day to day lives: information with personal and meaningful value
Weaknesses
Jacob’s study was a long time ago and early research normally lacked adequate control: got distracted. Results won’t be valid due to the confounding variables not being controlled. It was supported by others so it has validity.
Weaknesses
Peterson and Peterson used artificial material. We try to remember meaningful things, not consonants. Lacked external validity.
Weaknesses
Baddley used artificial material as well.
Weaknesses
Miller overestimated STM capacity. Cowan said STM -was 4 chunks. This shows 5 is more appropriate than 7 or 9