Coding, Capacity and Duration of Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Coding

A

Format in which info is stored in each memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Baddley (coding)

A

Gave 4 groups lists to remember: acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar, semantically dissimilar.
Findings: More mistakes when recalling acoustically-similar words straight after learning them. More mistakes recalling semantically similar words after 20 minutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Capacity

A

Amount of info which can be kept in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Jacobs (capacity)

A

Read out 4 digits and if correct, read out 5 and so on until you make a mistake.
Findings: digits is 9.3 and letters is 7.3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Miller (capacity)

A

Said that every thing comes in 7s: 7 deadly sins. So STM capacity is 7+-2. Also said chunking can help us recall info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Duration

A

Amount of time that info can be kept in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Peterson et al (duration)

A

Tested 24 undergraduate students. Each student had 8 trials. Each trial was given consonant syllable and 3 digit no. to count back in threes (preventing mental rehearsal). Told to stop after 3,6,9,12,18 secs.
Findings: More correct responses when retention interval was short

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bahrick et al (duration)

A

Studied 392 participants aged between 17-74 in Ohio. High school yearbooks. Two tests: 1)photo recognition and 2)recall all the names of their graduating class

Findings: 
15 years after graduation = 90% accurate in test 1. 
48 years after = 70% accurate in test 1.
15 years after = 60% accurate in test 2.
48 years after = 30% accurate in test 2.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Coding Capacity Duration of STM and LTM

A

STM LTM
Acoustic Semantic
7+-2 Unlimited
18-30 secs Unlimited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strengths

A

Bahrick et al’s 1975 study used meaningful stimuli. This suggests that the findings have high ecological
validity because they can be easily generalised to real-life, due to the stimuli reflecting those which
we would often try to learn and recall in our day to day lives: information with personal and meaningful value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Weaknesses

A

Jacob’s study was a long time ago and early research normally lacked adequate control: got distracted. Results won’t be valid due to the confounding variables not being controlled. It was supported by others so it has validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Weaknesses

A

Peterson and Peterson used artificial material. We try to remember meaningful things, not consonants. Lacked external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Weaknesses

A

Baddley used artificial material as well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Weaknesses

A

Miller overestimated STM capacity. Cowan said STM -was 4 chunks. This shows 5 is more appropriate than 7 or 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly