CLP - Pre-trial hearings and confessions Flashcards
Who is responsible for ensuring that proper procedures are in place for recording information and retaining records of information and other material during an investigation?
The officer in charge of the investigation
Where the defendant is convicted and given a custodial sentence, how long does the duty to retain material last?
At least until the defendant is released from custody
Give examples of unused materials
- statements from witnesses that the prosecution is not relying upon at trial to prove its case
- records of previous convictions of prosecution witnesses
- disciplinary findings against police officers.
Give examples of used materials
- statements from the prosecution witnesses
- the defendant’s record of taped interview
- other documentary exhibits such as plans and diagrams relevant to proving the case.
What is the name of the document which is a written statement served on the prosecution and the Court, setting out the nature of the accused defence, the matters of fact on which D takes issue with the prosecution and why, any points of law D wishes to take including authority in support and the particulars of any alibi witness?
Defence statement
When should a defendant serve a defence statement on the Crown Court and the prosecution?
Within 28 days of the date when the prosecution complies with its duty of initial disclosure or purports to do so
This time limit can be extended but only if the application to extend is made within the time limit and only if the court is satisfied that it would not be reasonable to require the defendant to give a defence statement within 28 days.
Consequence of failing to serve a defence statement in a magistrates’ court
The defendant will not be able to make an application for specific disclosure
AND
the prosecution will not have the opportunity to review disclosure in light of the issues
When does the continuing duty of disclosure by the prosecution last until?
Until the defendant is convicted, acquitted or the prosecutor decides not to proceed
It has become clear during an investigation that material which is relevant to the prosecution case may be held by a financial institution. What is the appropriate step to take to ensure production of the material if it is not forthcoming?
The prosecution can seek a summons
If there is material held by third parties that might be considered capable of undermining the prosecution case or of assisting the case for the accused, then prosecutors should take appropriate steps to obtain it. Where material is requested from a third party but access or disclosure is refused, the prosecution can consider seeking a summons for production of the material.
Define evidence
Material used to (dis)prove a fact in issue or support/ undermine the credibility of a witness
What are the facts in issue?
The facts the prosecution bear the burden of (dis)proving in order to establish the guilt of the accused and the facts that in exceptional cases, the accused bears the burden of proving in order to establish the defence.
How might a fact be proved in court?
Live oral testimony
s.9 CJA 1967 - read statement
s. 10 CJA 1967 - agreed facts
judicial notice
Principal ways of excluding evidence and/or seeking to bring a prosecution case to an end are:
- Applications for dismissal;
- Submissions of no case to answer;
- Applications to exclude evidence under s.79 PACE
- Applications to exclude confessions under s.76 PACE
- Applications to exclude evidence under the preserved common law provisions – s.82(3) PACE
- Abuse of process applications
What would be the appropriate application to make where the police have deliberately destroyed evidence that would have assisted the defence?
Abuse of process application
If evidence has been irregularly obtained for example in breach of PACE or the Codes of Practice does this render it inadmissible per se under s.78 PACE 1984?
Simply because evidence has been irregularly obtained in breach of PACE or the Codes of Practice do not render it inadmissible per se. The key test for the court in deciding whether to exclude prosecution evidence under s.78 is whether the admission of the evidence would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit it.
In principle, does s.76 or s.78 PACE 1984 exert a broader protective sweep for the defendant?
Section 78 PACE allows a court to examine a case from a perspective of overall fairness, including oppression or unreliability engaged under s.76 PACE 1984.
What are the 4 stages of disclosure?
1) The investigation stage – the duty to record and retain material during the investigation;
2) The initial duty of disclosure on the prosecution;
3) Defence disclosure; and
4) The continuing duty on the prosecution to keep disclosure under review
What is the prosecution’s statutory duty of disclosure in criminal cases?
To disclose any material that might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the prosecution case or assisting the defence (Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s3).
What standard is applied in deciding if material meets the disclosure test?
Objective
In the Crown Court, what must the disclosure officer prepare in relation to unused material?
A schedule (MG6C) listing all unused material.
What is the difference between used and unused material in a criminal investigation?
Used material: relied upon by the prosecution at trial.
Unused material: not relied upon at trial.
Examples of used: witness statements, defendant interview, exhibits.
Examples of unused: non-relied upon witness statements, prior convictions of prosecution witnesses, disciplinary findings against police.
Why is unused material important to the defence?
Because it may help the defence or undermine the prosecution’s case. Fairness requires disclosure of such material.
Who are the key roles in the investigation stage of disclosure?
Officer in charge of the investigation: directs investigation and procedures
Investigator: conducts investigation
Disclosure officer: responsible for examining material retained and revealing material to the prosecutor and to the defence at the prosecutor’s request.
What is the duty of the investigator under the Disclosure Code?
Must follow all reasonable lines of enquiry, whether they point towards or away from the suspect. Must be fair and objective.