Climate Change Flashcards
Kyoto Protocol:
1997 agreement to create a global cap-and-trade system
– U.S. withdrew during the Bush administration ⇒ ineffective
IPCC
U.N. panel that summarizes research and outlines pathws to decarb
2015 Paris Agreement
countries promised to keep warming < 2◦C
⇒ In the near term, most regulations likely to occur w/in countries
The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC)
the marginal damage from an additional ton of carbon, given the current amount of carbon in the atmosphere
Efficient amount of reduction
where the SMC of ↓ pollution by one unit is equal to the MD of that unit of pollution
Researchers care about the SCC for two reasons
- Important theoretical parameter: Key input in using externality theory to decide how much remaining CO2 we should emit
- Useful from a communication standpoint:
– A simple way of conveying the magnitude of damage
→ Reveals the harm to the world from emitting one more ton, given all emissions that have come before
the SCC increases over time
1) The MD curve is ↑ in the amount of carbon in the atmosphere
2) Over time, there will be more carbon in the atmosphere
⇒ The marginal damage from an additional ton will be larger
The SCC incorporates both contemporary and future damages
1) Carbon stays in the atmosphere for at least 300 years
2_ The SCC is a measure of external damage on all third parties, including future generations
⇒ when calculating the SCC, must account for future damages
5 steps to calculating SCC
- Measure the effect of carbon emissions on the climate, using Global Climate Models from climate scientists (Large, computable models)
- Measure how changes in climate affect economic & social outcomes
– Use quasi-experiments and causal econometric strategies
– Study effects on health, mortality, productivity, conflict, growth, etc… - Monetize the social and economic harms
- Choose a discount rate and discount the harms by year
– A value that captures how much we care about the future v. the present
– Low discount rate (e.g., 2%): place sim. weight on future v. present
– High discount rate (e.g., 7%): place low weight on the future - Finally, take all the discounted harms in each year and add them
Discount Rate
captures how we care about the future v. present
Present Value
value today of receiving a dollar in the future
Obama Administration Task Force
– Relied on Integrated Assessment Models (IAM)
– Used multiple IAMs, with different discount rates
– Found that the SCC is moderately high:
→ 2020: $42 per ton; 2030: $50 per ton; 2050: $69 per ton
16 / 34
IAMs jointly calculate the effects of
- Carbon on climate change
- Climate change on social & economic outcomes
Uncertainty in Climate Change
- Effects of carbon on the climate
— feedback loops or threshold effects may accelerate warming - Effects of changes in the climate on social wellbeing
— large-scale migrations may lead to extremist governments
Distributional effects
- The particular design of the policies
- How the revenue is spent