Classical Economy and Wood Shortage Flashcards

1
Q

RONALD SHEPHARD - ECONOMISTS

A

TURGOT - DIMINISHING RETURNS - SCHUMPETER: MORE IMPORTANT THAN SMITH

  • Turgot introduced the ‘law of diminishing returns’. Schumpeter: ‘it embodies an achievement that is nothing short of brilliant and suffices in itself to place Turgot as a theorist high above Adam Smith’.
  • Loosely worded, proposition asserts that as equal quantities of capital and labour are applied successively to a given plot of land, the output resulting from these applications will increase monotonically at first up to a point, after which further applications will result in decreasing product increments tending to 0.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SCHABAS - ECONOMISTS

A

SMITH VS JS MILL - QUESNAY VS MARSHALL - MID-18 -> MID-19TH C. - JEVONS TP - PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS

  • Adam Smith thought nature was wise, just and benevolent; whilst JS Mill thought it was imprudent, unjust and cruel.
  • Francois Quesnay - wealth was a gift of nature, whereas Alfred Marshall - it could be defined only in terms of property claims, and thus as a human institution.
  • Classical economy - fluid term. Some extend between Petty and Marx, others between Smith and Cairnes. Schabas uses term as shorthand for a body of ideas that spans the period from die mid-18th century to the mld-nineteenth.
  • Denaturalisation of the economy was triggered by the incipient rise of industrialisation and growing sophistication of the economy.
  • “Nature meant for Smith the humanly unhindered or unobstructed, and this more amply means what is not confounded by the misplaced interventions of human reason: letting nature take its course, letting men do as they are instinctively prompted to do”
  • Jevons’s Coal Question (1865) marks the point at which economists turned away from natural resources. It Is highly ironic that one of the vanguard of the neoclassical school would still use strong Malthusian analysis.
  • The leitmotiv of classical economics pointed to the physical constraints of nature setting limits to human prosperity. Human agency was still subordinate to the forces of nature, although there were glimmerings of paths for conquest. We will see JS Mill that man can come to be almost fully in charge of his destiny, although wealth is still bounded. With the neoclassical theory that emerged in the 1870s and 1880s, wealth’s cast in terms of mental satisfaction or utility and, thereby, become truly delimited.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

JONSSON - ECONOMICS

A

SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT LAB - SMITH, HUME VS NATURAL HISTORIANS (LINNEAUS, POIVRE, BANKS)(FMC VS ECONOMIC NATIONALISM)

  • ⁃ David Hume, Adam Smith, and their successors in the classical liberal tradition, nature served as a handmaiden for exchange in a double sense. They looked to the natural world for a model of self-regulating balance that justified their own faith in market exchange.
  • The liberal current of classical political economy give way to militaristic loyalism and Malthusian pessimism at the end of the eighteenth century. A strong conservative tendency was present already at the epicentre of enlightened debate in the 1750s.
  • In other words, the laboratory of Highland improvement gave rise to rival programs of modernization
  • the eighteenth century saw the emergence of two rival ecologies of commerce: cosmopolitan free trade versus economic nationalism.
  • Classical economy> Hume>Smith>Malthus>Ricardo / Natural historians>Linnaeus>Poivre>Banks
  • The major disagreement behveen Smith and the natural historians concerned the resilience and stability of nature. Smith read natural history selectively in order to underscore the benign operation of natural systems across the globe. Laissez faire, lassez-passer. In contrast, natural historians assumed a complex and fragile world in which the self-regulating properties of natural systems could be disrupted. To some degree, this perception reflected the European encounter with new climate zones and habitats. In part, it also registered the convulsions of the colonization process, ranging from famine and epidemics to resource depletion and falling biodiversity.
  • While contemporary natural historians like Poivre worried about climate change and soil erosion, Smith’s model assumed a stable and bountiful natural order immune to large-scale disaster, in which cycles of abundance and scarcity followed an essentially moderate path between extremes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

HARTLEY - WOOD

A

EVELYN - RS - WREN

  • Focuses on Sylvia by Evelyn. Suggests that the Foresters, following in the footsteps of Baconian logic, entered the RS and promoted experimentation to boost yield. This included the likes of Hale and Christopher Wren.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

WARREN - ECONOMY

A

COLONIALISM - COMMODIFICATION OF LAND - PROPERTY OWNERSHIP

  • The appropriation and commodification of land constituted an economic revolution in Europe, and in colonial possessions it assumed truly spectacular dimensions… The most dramatic example since the time of John Locke was the US. There, laws encouraged parcelling out Western lands, and thereby helped to create a vast, property owning middle class.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

TRIBE - CAMERALISM

A

Cameralism - German Economic Affairs

  • Good government and the promotion of happiness turn out to involve ever-extending work of regulation - from rulers of dress, through order and cleanliness of in the streets, to rules on the export and import of goods.
  • Polizei and oeconomy served the same ends, and in this respect they were synonymous.
  • One of the first writers on German economic affairs of the state was J.H.G., in Curieuser und nachdencklicher.
  • Sir James Steuart’s Inquiry was better known and more frequently cited than Smith’s Wealth of Nations. Smith was widely ignored. For 20yrs it had little interest, until the phase of ‘Smithianism’ began. (Reason unclear - some suggest it was the poor translation by Schiller; but then again, many Northern Germans read English) .
  • Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason liberated economics from the determinism of a practical philosophy based upon Leibniz and Wolff.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CHANDRA MUKERJI - FORESTRY

A

Colbert 1669 - Cartography - Land Rationalisation and Commodification - Assertion of Power

  • Examines the Colbert forest reforms in 1669 via the accounts of Froidour.
  • Traditional view: The reform of French forests in the 1660s has often been described as a means of rationalizing the landscape to suppress peasant culture and empower the state.
  • Merchant & Scott suggest that the reformers rationalised the spaces they studied, and destroyed indigenous relations to the environment, using techniques of political cartography and control that were becoming widespread in the late 16th and 17th centuries. (IMPORTANT PART B)
  • Mukerji contends the intent was to make the crown more of a presence to nobles in remote areas rather than making peasant areas more legible to the government.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

BUTLER - CLASSICAL ECONOMY

A

Smith - Truck and Barter (moral) - Division of Labour

  • Smith recognised that both sides benefited from trade, not just the seller; he realised that the market was an automatic mechanism that allocated resources with great efficiency; he understood the wide and fertile collaboration between different producers that this mechanism made possible.
  • Smith showed that free trade between nations, and between individuals at home too, left both sides better off.
  • Specialisation improved efficiency through: skill via repetition, less transitional time, labour saving devices.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

WARDE - CLASSICAL ECONOMY

A

Smith - Limits (lack of concern) - Chemists, not Economists concerned by degradation

  • Adam Smith - ‘did not worry about limits’.
  • Classical political economy emerged precisely at the time when such limits were first becoming a matter of concern – and yet barely considered them. The idea that ‘Man deals in nothing but earth’ was not considered a serious constraint to economic development, still less the idea that the earth could become less.
  • The framing of political economy, once integrated with new theories of the soil, did permit the identification of a new systemic risk: the degradation of the land. But this argument was not advanced by the economists, but by men working in agronomy who had also become preoccupied with making their work relevant to the wider polity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FOSTER - MARX

A

Newtonian World View - Nature governed by external mechanics of Providence

  • Marx has been perceived as not interested in ecology; however in recent studies, this idea has been completely reversed.
  • Marx’s materialism is said to have led him to emphasise a kind of “Baconian domination of nature and economic development, rather than asserting ecological values.”
  • Marx analysed the human alienation from nature in a sophisticated and ecologically sensitive form. This tendency was reinforced by concerns regarding human subsistence and the relationship to the soil, and the whole problem of capitalist agriculture. Central to this thinking was a concerning regarding the antagonistic division between town and country.
  • Newtonian world view - nature governed by external mechanical laws determined by divine providence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

FRITZBØGER - A WINDFALL FOR MAGNATES

A

Denmark - Magnates - Privatisation of Commons

  • Fritzboger traces the wood scarcity issue in Denmark, which contributed to the rise of enclosure (privatisation of common ownership) and the enactment of statutes mandating preservation of woodlands. This approach had some similarity with English law, notably, one owner among any number could force a partition - a court-conducted division of the commonly owner forest into privately owned parcels. The striking difference here however was the fact that such law placed restriction on the division of land into very small pieces. This division principle worked strongly in the favour of landowners. “Danish forest history documents the ability of elites to manipulate legal rules to their own continuing advantage. Breaking up the commons, in addition to any efficiency advantages, also appears to have been a means of making tenants more productive and docile. According to one estate bailiff writing in 1791, ‘as long as the peasants remain or want to remain in common, frequent gatherings will cause boozing and brawls.’ The title’s “windfall for the magnates” refers to the fact that, as the growing scarcity of wood made forests more and more valuable, by and large forests owned in common ended up in the hands of the nobility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WARDE - WOOD SHORTAGE

A

Govt power legitimation - Scarcity in fragmented polities - SW Germany + Venice show state involvement to secure supply

  • Claims governments used scarcity concerns (fictional or actual) to legitimate regulation of woods.
  • Fears of scarcity arose where the polities controlling a particular region were highly fragmented, providing political barriers to the acquisition of fuel resources that might not be geographically far removed, and allowing wood-rich lords to encourage bidding among consumers.
  • Paul Warde’s research in southwestern Germany and Karl Appuhn’s study of Renaissance Venice demonstrate that, although vastly different geographically and economically, in both regions the fear of wood scarcity spurred the involvement of state authorities to make sure adequate supplies of forest resources existed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

JACOB SOLL - ECONOMY

A

Dutch - mercantilism envied - Petty & Colbert -> lang of accounting for state admin.

  • Soll essentially deconstructs the history of Holland as a first mover in the mercantile world - signposting its moves towards a more globalised form of operation. Holland’s wealth and political economy became the world-standard, and many nations attempted to emulate the success of the nation, namely through the restructuring of the government to introduce notions of political economy.
  • Soll examines England and France as case studies; and within that, William Petty (who looked towards new measures of national income and taxation through financial and social statistics) and Colbert (FR) who adopted a language of accounting and political economy for state administration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HOUGHTON - IMPROVEMENT

A
  • Post-Civil War was a turning point in improvement. Significant move by gentry into improvement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

TONY WRIGLEY - ECONOMY

A
  • World limited by the photosynthetic constraint of the organic economy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

JAMES SCOTT - ECONOMY

A
  • Technology made authorities treat nature as more malleable + controllable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Nachhaltigkeit

A
  • fundamental to new scientific forestry in Germany. By 1730, Brunswick forestry Johann Georg von Langen started a ‘Forsteinrichtung’ (planning of the forest). In 1761, Duchess Anna Amalia initiated in 1761 the first general survey of forests of the German territorial state. Amalia’s foresters and ‘jägermeister’ had the year 2050 on their time prediction horizons.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Cameralism

A
  • Government as agent of prosperity. Increasing social prosperity shores up princely power. Cameralists attempted to convince the ruler that they had essential knowledge (had to justify existence). Government attempted to produce surveys to regulate natural resource. In practice, ineffective. The process by which Cameralism was displaced by Nationalökonomie has traditionally been dealt with in terms of the impact of Smithianism on a moribund subject- the reception of the Wealth of Nations providing the framework for an understanding of the pace and extent of this displacement. Physiocracy also became more pronounced in popular if not academic circles.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Foresters

A
  • Tended to be men of law, maths and science. Believed they had the capacity to make the most desirable and sustainable forests. 1840s - formal examination of foresters essential in Austria. Apex in 1860s.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Improvement

A
  • Introduced by the scientific revolution. Driven by ingenuity and virtue. Rather than being utilitarian, improvement found power in its appeal to self-improvement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Scientific Forestry

A
  • ‘a new husbandry’ - using technologies of survey, measurement and control.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Vitalism

A
  • Nature as life-force. Seen as keystone between earlier and later discussions of nature.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

French Wood Shortage

  • Who was Carlowitz?
  • When was forestry taught in university?
  • Quote Hartig
A
  • Saxony - Director of Mines - Sylvicultura Oeconomica - 1713 - sustainability. Saving Europe from economic and social disaster by preserving and strengthening the Christian culture and wonders of nature.
  • Forestry instruction began at university from 19th C. -> Important -> Heinrich von Cotta, 1817.
  • 1804 - Georg Hartig: ‘“Forest mensuration and forest management planning, or to determine exactly the present and future sustainable cut, or to establish a trustworthy cutting budget, is, indisputably, one of the most important responsibilities in any forest administration. .… Every wise forest administration has to draw up such sustainable forest management plans that allow so high utilisation rate of forest as possible, nevertheless, so that the administration looks after interests of future generations so that a fair distribution of interests between the present and future generations will come true.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

French Wood Shortage

  • What happened in Scotland?
  • How did Hume and Smith respond to the situation?
  • What response did they make to finite land supply?
  • What was the geographical accident?
  • What was dramatic in the mid-18th century?
A
  • Highland region now seemed a society on the edge of collapse, burdened with surplus population, exhausted resources, and permanent natural disadvantages. Paradoxically, the fear of limits emerged precisely at the moment when Enlightenment ideology and industrialization began to make sustained economic growth imaginable.
  • The environmental and ethnic peculiarities of the region were employed to justify a model of improvement based on accommodation rather than assimilation. In contrast, the liberal strategy of David Hume and Adam Smith had no need for special treatment. If the Highlands could not be integrated into the commercial order of the south, then the region must remain an economic backwater of no consequence.
  • The finite supply of land, they thought, must eventually block all progress. Although such fears proved premature to say the least, they have been revived in recent times by natural scientists and environmentalists who worry that a finite biosphere cannot sustain for long the exponential growth of the global economy.
  • Geographic accident made the Scottish Highlands a laboratory of the Scottish Enlightenment. The central problem of classical political economy, how a rich and a poor country might prosper together, divided not just Scotland from England and other more prosperous nations but also Scotland from itself.
  • Highland improvement in mid-18th c was dramatic. The headlong rush provoked questions about the destructive consequences of agrarian capitalism. The lawyer improvers who attacked feudal vestiges like entail and primogeniture grappled with the possibility that excessive commercialism might threaten the basis of their own authority as landowners.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

French Wood Shortage

  • What did the Prussian throne critique in 1740?
  • What did the Cameralists promote?
  • Where did Cameralism develop?
A
  • 1739-40 - Prussian throne critiqued The Prince (Machiavelli). Friedrich stated: “The interest of a prince is thus to populate a country, to make it flourish, not to devastate and destroy it”
  • 1600s - following Schroeder, belief that ‘without a flourishing population, the revenues of the ruler inexorably decline.’ Solutions to securing rulers power: promotion of the higher strata, gaining trust of common people, plundering the rich’.
  • Cameralism developed (potentially accidentally) in northern German Protestant universities - Halle, Frankfurt an de Oder, Rinteln.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

French Wood Shortage

  • What did French kings do, traditionally?
  • What did Colbert’s reforms do?
  • What motivated Colbert?
  • What techniques were used?
  • How did some families act independently?
  • How did locals oppose?
  • What did Froidour conclude?
A
  • Traditionally, French kings gave enormous autonomy to rural nobles, and in return had them collect taxes, administer lands, and run the courts as agents of the monarchy.
  • Colbert’s independent surveillance was to make it difficult for these families to use forests at their own will.
  • Colbert was driven by moral terms. Land needed to be understood and managed for the collective benefit. Territory should be improved. (Protestant ethics).
  • Cartographical techniques: arpentage and bournage.
  • Arpentage: drawing a chain with measured segments through a forest and along its boundaries - allowed drawing of parcels of land.
  • Bournage: earth-based counterpart: meant setting out property markers to indicate the boundaries of a forest as it had been measured by the foresters and represented on paper.
  • Opposition to be expected - culturally imbued in the people of Languedoc. Local nobles not loyal to nobility.
  • Great families in the mountains often treated their lands as separate principalities, minting their own coins, setting up their own courts, levying their own taxes, and controlling uses of natural resources.
  • Froidour was first sent into the Midi-Pyrenees, assuming that he was entering a hostile region precisely to bring the state’s policies to the recalcitrant population there.
  • “The heights of the mountains are covered with woods that belong to the king, which the locals exploit freely under the pretext that they have traditional rights of usage, and have abused them to such an extent that there is nothing but brush” - Froidour
  • In the mountainous area, peasants had to down trees to make meadows for growth - Froidour saw this as destruction.
  • The forestry papers made ‘the territorial state palpable far from Versailles’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Spanish Wood Shortage

  • What occurred in Germany?
  • What did disputes rest upon?
  • What did Helmhard von Hohberg observe?
  • Detail wood consumption in Madrid and Italy
  • What did Foresters note?
A
  • Agrarian unrest in Germany frequently took the form of widespread wood theft in the years upto and including 1848. The law gave the landowner the power to disproportionately fine those found guilty, which particularly angered Karl Marx.
  • Disputes relied on the invocation of positive law, natural rights, common interests.
  • German agronomist Wolf Helmhard von Hohberg observed, ‘Were we not to have wood, then we would have no fire, then would we have to eat all meals raw and freeze in winter, we would have no houses, would also have no lime or bricks, no glass, no metal, we would have neither table nor doors, neither stools or other furnishings’. In short, wood was the raw material that permitted early modern life.
  • 1680 Madrid - 1.4kg wood per capita per day, rising to 2.15kg in late 18th century.
  • 1861 - Italy - 1.9kg/ day.
  • Foresters noted that managing wood stock was difficult to predict with variation between compartments of land. A reconfiguration of woodland space required the abolition of common rights over private.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Spanish Wood Shortage

  • When was there a wood shortage in Spain?
  • How much wood did a galleon require?
  • Why was there a wood shortage?
  • What balance did the state need to strike?
  • Why did Felipe seek information about his domain?
  • What became increasingly important in the 16th century?
  • What did the Armarda do?
  • Who made an important map?
A
  • Later, in the sixteenth or seventeenth century, when the crown wanted timber from one of these municipal commons, it argued that the land really still belonged to the king, and “Your Majesty has the right of entry to fell trees in municipal forests just like one of the local inhabitants.”
  • a galleon of about 560 tons required about 900 oak trees, and galleys built in Barcelona used approximately 200 to 300 pine trees each.
  • Timber resources were essential for maintaining the fleets that controlled Spain’s transatlantic empire in the sixteenth century.
  • Madrid had to balance local interests and imperial demands. The crown could push its demands only so far until a town would refuse to carry out plantation quotas or pay certain fines.
  • Felipe II sought information about his monarchy that included all kinds of geographic information, not just forests. He combined multiple approaches to learn about the natural and cultural resources of his realm, including questionnaires, maps, and bureaucratic reports. There is no reason to doubt that the king thought each of these approaches would provide useful information about the varied resources of his realms and could potentially contribute to better government.
  • Meanwhile, Felipe II commissioned multiple mapping projects and enhanced the use of maps for war and administration. The questionnaires, for example, resulted in the production of stunning maps of Spain’s overseas possessions, including the first map ever of the western Pacific Ocean region. Maps became increasingly important for monarchs and their governments in the sixteenth century.
  • The pressure on traditional sources of timber for shipbuilding sent Felipe in search of new sources. It is well known that in the period after the Armada, Spain was forced to import more materials and a greater number of ships. The fact that Felipe also searched for more sources of timber within Spain itself is often overlooked.
  • Identified things such as Valcanera, this forest had no pine trees, but it featured very abundant (abundantı´ssimo de) oak trees, mostly very old. The master shipbuilder from Barcelona believed the larger ones would be suitable for shipbuilding, but there were few that could be used for the joints and braces.
  • Jorge Setara’s map, royal legislation for the forests of Guipu´zcoa and Vizcaya, road construction near the Monastery of Benifasar, forest inspections in Catalonia, and other developments mentioned earlier, all contributed to the territorialization of state power in Spain from the middle of the sixteenth century.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Key Events - Classical Economy

  • Detail key moments in Venice in terms of wood shortage?
A
  • 1408 -> Venice secured rights over wood in Montello district to meet wood demands.
  • 1476 -> Doge issued regulation for use of oaks throughout community forests on terra firma. By 16th century, wood use of private interests highly circumscribed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Gifford Pinchot (US Chief of the Bureau of Forestry)

  • Where did Pinchot train?
  • What did he criticise?
  • Who did he advice
  • What did he publish in 1905?
A
  • Trained in Prussian forest-academy
  • Criticising the ‘cut out and get out’ approach to forestry, claimed that the 1890s saw the ‘most rapid and extensive forest destruction even known’. During this period, however, to waste timber was a virtue, not a crime in the likes of the US.
  • Under Theodore Roosevelt, the leitmotif of ‘wise use’ came to characterise Pinchot’s approach to forestry.
  • 1905 - ‘The Use of the National Forest Reserves’ - ’the prime object of the forest reserves is wise use. While the forest and its dependent interests must be made permanent and safe by preventing overcasting or injury to young growth, every reasonable effort ill be made to satisfy legitimate demands’.
  • Concept rooted in the ethics of classical utilitarianism described by Bentham and Mill - ‘greatest good for the greatest number’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Rau, 1800

  • What concerns did Rau have?
  • What did Rau recommend to governments?
  • What are the conditions for prosperity?
A
  • Emphasised dangers of commercial freedom: absence of checks on poor workmanship, absence of means of knowledge transmission.
  • Government should regulate activity for common good; including examinations for artisans.
  • Post-Smithian: having accepted the role of guild organisation, he argues that commercial liberty is utopian.
  • Government should not only maintain peace and order, but also regulate and administer the conditions of production and distribution.
  • Conditions for prosperity: ‘personal freedom, security of property, education, a system of credit and finance’
  • Where Smith dedicates the greatest amount of space to the sources of government revenue, Ray dedicates the greater parts of his work to industry and trade.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

James Steuart

  • What book did Steuart write?
  • What did Steuart conclude about agriculture?
  • What rebutted Steuart?
A

Inquiry: The first book deals with population and agriculture, and opens with the familiar notion of the economy modelled on the household and directed by the head, (who is both lord and steward of the family’.

“While no-one can dispute that agriculture is the foundation of multiplication, and the most essential requisite for the prosperity of the state, it does not follow that everyone should be employed in agriculture. The promotion agriculture beyond the immediate demand for agricultural produce - the course of action to be followed by a wise statesman - creates a need for non-agricultural classes who can produce an equivalent acceptable to agriculturalists. Reciprocal wants must be created by he statesman ‘on order to bind the society together’

Wealth of Nations was a rebuttal to Inquiry. WoN was influential in England from 1776 onwards -less so in Germany.

33
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Who were the cameralists, what did they think?

A

Schroeder: Version of utopia was premised on economic well-being.

Becher: Rules of state - promotion of populous living, attract migrants

Seckendorff: Promoted geographical assessment of land to quantify potential.

Justi: sciences relevant to ‘government and the great economy of the state’ as politics, Polizei, commerce, mines, Cameralism, and finance, together with the art of house holding or oeconomy. “I understand here by happiness of the subjects the good order and condition of a state such that each is able, by his own efforts, to attain those moral and temporal goods which are necessary for a pleasant life according to his respective Stand”

Schlettwein: Physiocratic in orientation - system outlined in 1772.

34
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Justus von Liebig

  • What did he note about tillage
  • What did he note about movement of manure?
  • Who copied him?
A
  • Liebig noted that political economy remained largely uninterested in the details of tillage, and indeed that Adam Smith’s engagement had been rather incidental.
  • to allow an active manure to pass into the hands of strangers, is in my eyes tantamount to exporting the vegetable soil of our fields, to lessening their productiveness, to raising the price of the food of the poor; for as much labour is required, as much care and capital must be expended upon an ungrateful soil to obtain a little, as upon a fertile soil to procure an ample return
  • Same argument copied later by Henry Carey. Liebig was particularly concerned, however, with the loss of nutrition to the sea. ‘welfare of states and the advancement of culture and civilisation is dependent on the resolution of the sewer-question (Kloakenfrage) of the cities’.
35
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Humphrey Davis

  • Who was he, what did he contribute?
A
  • Humphrey Davis - Agricultural Economist
  • ‘When cattle are fed upon land not benefitted by their manure, the effect is always exhaustion of the soil’
  • Man does not see nature as ‘as a secure and inalterable inheritance, spontaneously providing for his wants; but as a doubtful and insecure possession, to be preserved only by labour, and extended and perfected by ingenuity.’
36
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Darwin

  • Where did Darwin’s ideas about evolution come from?
  • When was Darwin most radical?
  • What was important about Darwin’s thesis on diversification?
A
  • Darwin’s theory on the transmutation of species drew heavily upon Malthus directly - the growth of population among species operated as “a force like a hundred thousand wedges” thrusting “every kind of adapted structure into the gaps in the oeconomy of Nature”.
  • Most radical in 1872: literally annihilated the traditional anthropocentric interpretation of “brute creation,” which was thought to be inseparably divided from human beings by lack of intelligence—as well as by the supposed fact that the earth and all of its creatures had been created by God for “man.”
  • Darwin’s thesis on diversification and expansion of the quantity of life mirrored the Smithian insight that the division of labour between trades is a function of the size of the market or the size of the economy more generally
37
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Marx

  • How did Marx attack Malthus?
  • What is the metabolic rift?
  • How does Foster interpret Marx’s use of the metabolic rift?
A
  • Attacked theory of Malthus. Believed the issue with the New Poor Law encouraged superabundance and lack of charity
  • Metabolic rift - notion of the “irreparable rift in the interdependent process of social metabolism,” —Marx’s key conception of ecological crisis tendencies under capitalism. Marx theorised a rupture in the metabolic interaction between humanity and the rest of nature emanating from capitalist production and the growing division between town and country.
  • As opposed to those who have attributed to Marx a disregard for nature and responsibility for the environmental problems of the Soviet Union, Foster sees in the theory of metabolic rift evidence of Marx’s ecological perspective. The theory of metabolic rift “enable[ed] [Marx] to develop a critique of environmental degradation that anticipated much of present-day ecological thought,” including questions of sustainability.
38
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Marquis de Condorcet

  • What was Condorcet’s conclusion about limits in the future?
A
  • ‘There is no person who does not see how very distant such a period is from us; but shall we ever arrive at it? It is equally impossible to pronounce for or against the future realization of an event, which cannot take place, but at an æra, when the human race will have attained improvements, of which we can at present scarcely form a conception’
39
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Ernest Haeckel

  • Who inspired Haeckel?
  • What did Haeckel invent?
  • What paved the way to this invention?
A
  • Admirer of Goethe, Humboldt and Darwin.
  • Developed term ‘oecologie’, the offspring of scientific biology. Presented in 1866.
  • Romantic view of nature as well as Alexander von Humboldt’s scientific approach to a geography of plants which paved the way for Ernst Haeckel’s coining of ‘Oecologie’ in 1866.
40
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Carl Linnaeus

  • What did Carl Linnaeus conclude about Nature’s economy?
  • What was the epitome of wealth?
  • What did Linnaeus produce in 1749?
A
  • ‘Nature’s economy shall be the base for our own, for it is immutable, but ours is secondary. An economist without knowledge of nature is therefore like a physicist without knowledge of mathematics.’
  • “the epitome of wealth, and, hence, the primary objective of the science of economics, was the domestication of foreign plants such as tea and cinnamon”.
  • Provided first full-fledged description of an economy, only it is a description of an economy that encompasses everything, including plants, animals and the deity.
  • Oeconomia naturae (1749) suggested that the world was in such perfect balance that each plant and species offered enough nourishment to others in a scala natura
41
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

JS Mill

A
  • Pivotal figure in denaturalising the economy
42
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Physiocrats

  • What did David Ricardo conclude about population growth and rent?
A
  • Ricardo claimed that a growth in population lowers the real wage, thus engendering a growth in production. This creates a differential profit rate, owing to different capital-labour ratios different sectors of the economy, which results in the shift in resources into the more profitable sectors.
  • The windfalls that came with machinery were for Ricardo cause for concern insofar as they could permanently displace labour.
  • Ricardo, like Say and Smith, sees air, land and water as gifts of nature. Like them, ‘he considers land to be different in that its supply is finite and, more important, access to it can be limited to this with might. But in contrast to Smith, he grants nature a role in manufacturing”. Smith - “Nature does nothing; man does all”. Ricardo - ‘Does nature nothing for man in manufactures? Are the powers of wind and water, which move our machinery, and assist navigation, nothing? The pressure of the atmosphere and the elasticity of steam, which enables us to work the most stupendous engines - are they not the gifts of nature?” to say nothing of the effects of the matter of heat in softening and melting metals, of the decomposition of the atmosphere in the process of dyeing and fermentation. There is not a manufacture which can be mentioned, in which nature does not give her assistance to man, and give too, generously and gratuitously
43
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Physiocrats

  • What was Robert Wallace’s 1761 conclusion?
A
  • Proto-Malthusian!
  • ‘mankind would increase so prodigiously, that the earth, would at last become overstocked and become unable to support its numerous inhabitants’
  • Under a “perfect government…. making would increase so prodigiously, that the earth would at last be overstocked and become unable to support its numerous inhabitants” Even the bounty of Providence was not inexhaustible. “Limits” had been “set to the fertility of the earth” which “probably could not be much altered without making considerable changes in the solar system”. Only “violence and war” could “make room for others to be born”
44
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Physiocrats

  • What did Turgot state about manufacturing?
  • What did Turgot state about husbandman?
  • What is characteristic of the transaction between nature and man?
A
  • Manufacturing, commerce, and other trades, everyone receives the just wages of their labour, as determined by the bargaining process.
  • ‘The husbandman is the only one whose industry produces more than the wages of his labour. He, therefore, is the only source of all wealth’.
  • In exchanges for goods, Turgot argued, the most labourers receive ‘the wages of his toil’, whether this is ‘limited to his wants’ (i.e. a subsistence wage) or ‘a conditional valuation of the price of his day’s work’ (one might say, the value of the esteem accorded to his labour in an exchange of goods).
  • Nature makes a ‘pure gift’ incommensurate to anything that man contributes: “nature does not bargain with him [man] to oblige him to content himself with what is absolutely necessary. What she grants is proportioned neither to his wants, nor to a contractual evaluation of the price of his days of labour. It is the physical result of the fertility of the soil, and of the wisdom, far more than of the laboriousness, of the means which he has employed to render it fertile.”
45
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Physiocrats

  • Detail Francois Quesnay’s 1758 Tableau Economique
A
  • Tableau economique in 1758. economy as a circulatory system of production and consumption. Divided between a productive class (agriculture) and sterile class (commerce) - which would be attacked by Adam Smith.
  • The whole of human labour was sterile without raw materials provided by Nature. ‘The earth was ever the first and the only source of all riches’.
46
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Thomas Malthus

  • What is Malthus concerned by?
  • Who irritated Malthus?
  • What was the polemical intent of Malthus’s essay?
  • What is the moral message behind Malthus?
  • What did Malthus think of China?
A
  • Not concerned by soil fertility as much as differential rates of growth.
  • Malthus was essentially agitated by Marquis de Condorcet, who had dismissed the view that population could outstrip resources.
  • Malthus’s Essay thus had a very polemical intent derived from natural theology. The nature of his argument-its precise polemical purpose—shifted, however, in later editions of his work. The Essay on Population went through six editions in Malthus’s lifetime (1798, 1803, 1806, 1807, 1817, and 1826).
  • 1798 - First Essay, 1803 - Second Essay. First essay did not account for moral restraint - abstinence from sex. This massively damaged his argument. Essay 2: Rectified. Moral restraint possible among the upper classes, but the poor were immoral and had illegitimate children. ‘The infant is, comparatively speaking, of no value to the society, as others will immediately supply its place’.
  • Malthus’s investigation of N. America found food and population geometric growth; which he explained away by claiming that the Americans had access to a finite reservoir.
  • Claimed that society could survive at low-equilibrium (citing China), where the population are forced to live at near starvation; or high equilibrium, where the aristocracy can enjoy nature’s ‘mighty feast’, but the poor still suffer. Instilled the fear that class boundaries could dissolve.
47
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

David Hume

  • What does Hume conclude about human behaviour?
  • What does Hume believe in, despite being an Atheist?
A
  • Humans follow predictable paths.
  • Despite being purportedly atheist, Hume often appeals to Providence and the “Author of Nature”.
48
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Adam Smith

  • Describe the stable state in Smith’s model
  • Provide Smith’s ‘limits’ quote
  • What did the Netherlands show?
A
  • In a country fully peopled in proportion to what either its territory could maintain or its stock employ, the competition for employment would necessarily be so great as to reduce the wages of labour to what was barely sufficient to keep up the number of labourers, and, the country being already fully peopled, that number could never be augmented.
  • Both productive and unproductive labourers, and those who do not labour at all, are all equally maintained by the annual produce of the land and labour of the country. This produce, how great soever, can never be infinite, but must have certain limits.’
  • Limits were not a concern - look at the Netherlands - the Netherlands is not so different from towns that produce no foodstuffs, ‘yet draw to themselves by their industry such a quantity of the rude produce of the lands of other people as supplies them, not only with the materials of their work, but with the fund of their subsistence.’
49
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Adam Smith

  • What did Smith believe in terms of specialisation?
  • What are the implications of Smith’s value prognosis?
  • What influence did New Husbundary have upon Smith?
  • What was the ‘problem’ in Smith’s model?
  • Where is Smith situated with regards improvement?
A
  • Specialisation: By specialising in particular tasks, the same number of people could do much more work in a given day, although there was no drop in the amount of raw material required per unit of output.
  • Labour was at the heart of value. Smith dismissed the physiocrats.
  • Influenced by New Husbandry. Adopted new thought on the relationship between fertility and manure. ‘the quantity of well-cultivated land must be in proportion to the quantity of manure which the farm itself produces; and this again must be in proportion to the stock of cattle which are maintained upon it.’
  • Smith was not interested in the question of whether this limitation restricted the capacity of the economy as a whole to expand, but rather what made it worthwhile to keep the cattle to fertilise the land.
  • Thus for him the problem was the insufficient demand for cattle, which in turn was a function of the limited size of the market.
  • The remains in the longstanding improving tradition that the fundamental agrarian problem was under-use, although his solution focuses more on the stimulating effects of demand and the freedom to exercise it.
50
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Adam Smith

  • What is the main focus of the wealth of nations?
  • What was the problem if not limits?
  • What does Smith suggest about the nature of pressure?
  • What did Smith think about the notion of workers covering the cost of their own reproduction?
  • Where is wealth found?
  • Quote Smith
A
  • The Wealth of Nations Smith was not interested in the question of whether this limitation restricted the capacity of the economy as a whole to expand, but rather what made it worthwhile to keep the cattle to fertilise the land.
  • the problem was the insufficient demand for cattle, which in turn was a function of the limited size of the market, low degree of specialization, and low earnings in towns.
  • Smith implied that pressure exerted by a population on resources is actually a stimulus to expansion, rather than a limit. The transition from hunter-gatherer to cultivator was prompted by a swelling population.
  • Saw political economy as moral as well as political question. Derided views which thought labourers merely covered the cost of their own reproduction.
  • Original source of value might be in foodstuffs, but the division of labour in manufacturing and incentives to improve in agriculture subsequently allowed production to expand far beyond that amount.
  • “The desire of food is limited in every man by the narrow capacity of the human stomach; but the desire of the conveniences and ornaments of building, dress, equipage, and household furniture, seems to have no limit or certain boundary.”
51
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Adam Smith

  • What was Smith educated in?
  • What did he write?
  • What was the basis of his system?
  • What is the origin of value?
A
  • Smith was educated in classics, maths, natural philosophy.
  • Inquiry into the Wealth of Nations - system of labour, capital (embodied labour) and land that operated through the circulation of goods produced by an expanding input of labour.
  • System rested on ‘truck and barter’ social interactions which demanded sympathy with the interlocutor. This was essentially a sentimental economy.
  • Origin of value was in the the mutually agreed assessment of the esteem of labour.
52
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

John Locke

A
  • Property rights and value of exchange. Capital as labour invested to transform nature.
  • “‘I think it will be but a very modest computation to say, that of the products of the earth useful to the life of man, nine tenths are the effects of labour: nay, if we will rightly estimate things as they come to our use, and cast up the several expences about them, what in them is purely owing to nature, and what to labour, we shall find, that in most of them ninety-nine hundredths are wholly to be put on the account of labour.”
  • Labour - father of wealth; land - mother
  • Original labourer on virgin soil won the natural right to property in the fruits of his labour… Nature did not enter into a system of payments, and therefore could not be accounted for as a progenitor of wealth.
  • Spent time in Holland.
53
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Hazzi, 1800

A
  • Framed unimproved forest as a residual of ‘chaos’ left from the Creation and as yet uncivilised.
54
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

James Hutton, 1788

A
  • Theory of Earth - conceived of earth as machine. Loss of soil in one location is made up elsewhere.
55
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Georg Hartig

A
  • ‘Where a sure balance of forest use’, declared Hartig, ‘based on mathematics and natural philosophy, is lacking, wood will always be over- or under-utilised’. Scientific nature of management.
56
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Heinrich Cotta

A
  • Doyen of Saxony after Carlowitz - goal -> ‘ “sustainably win from the woods in relation to requirements the greatest possible and most appropriate usage with the lowest possible costs”
57
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Carl Von Carlowitz

A
  • 1712 - ‘If the annual output is fixed against the re-growth with sowing and planting, namely so that can be amply replaced, and the woods are treated with care, then no wood shortage will ensue… and if this precaution, and all devisable means are not applied such that a balance between growth and re-growth, and the output of the woods, ensues, then there is no doubt that this enterprise (Wirtschaft) will fail…’
  • ‘Continuirliche, bestandige und nachhaltende’
58
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Francis Bacon

A
  • Scientific Revolution. Bacon is depicted as the principle proponent of the “domination of nature” - a point that is usually developed by quoting certain aphorism, without any systematic consideration of his thought. Hence, the idea of the ‘domination of nature is treated as a simple, straightforward anthropocentric perspective, characteristic of mechanism, to which a Romantic, organicist, vitalistic, post-modern view can be opposed.
59
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Matthew Hale

A
  • Looks at dearth, poverty, slavery, Amerindian cannibalism as God’s design to limit ‘over-plentitude… in the Number of Men’
60
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

William Petty

A
  • Colonial administrator, economist, statistician. Cut his teeth on population distribution in Ireland. Aware that a polity could survive on infertile sources through business acumen. Clear that ‘commercial acumen could transcend local limits’. Venice- CS.
  • Petty referred to labour as the ‘father and active principle of wealth’, and land as ‘the mother’.
61
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Samuel Hartlib

A
  • Intelligencer - a channel and purveyor of ideas and information.
  • Major authority on improvement.
62
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

John Evelyn

A
  • Sylva, or a Discourse of Forest Trees, 1644 - Comprehensive listing of the appropriate use of different types of wood. Elm -> water resistant; Oak -> building timber; Beech -> furniture; Ash -> weapons; Birch -> coloniser for poor ground.
  • Generally, people were more pragmatic than discerning.
  • 1661 - Fumifugum - attempted (unsuccessfully) to limit emissions from sea-coal.
  • Formed the Royal Society - ‘the greatest proponent of conservation in England of the seventeenth century.’
  • Complained of ‘prodigious havoc’ upon the English forests by ironworks, glassworks etc. ‘This devaluation is now become so epidemical, that unless some favourable expedient offer itself..’ The woods would be destroyed.
63
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Hugh Platt

A
  • Outlines need to conserve the soil to preserve an ‘essence’ of life known as ‘Balsamun’. An idea running back to Paracelsus in early 16th century.
  • Believed anyone with more than four acres should plant an acre of trees.
64
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Rock Church, 1610

A
  • Detailing concern about whether coal would run out: “for doe we thinke that wood alone can beare the brung to satisfies euery mans chimney? Assuredly no”
  • To meet wood demand: 3-4 trees planted for every one cut (practice in Europe).
  • Gave a quantifiable sense of how much woodland had disappeared over time, by examining amount of land vs population to get a figure on rate of disappearance. Main interest was to increase crown revenue. In France, division of land into 10 plots was not to do with sustainability, but to make renting easier.
65
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Giovanni Botero, 1589

A
  • Greatness of Cities - examining urban life, found density encouraged poor sanitation.
  • Importance of just princely rule, countering Machiavelli - Reasons of State. Theorised a finite limit to earth stock: ‘‘the world was so full of people… such that the fruits of the earth, from which people must draw their sustenance, cannot feed a greater number’.
  • Whilst cities could sustain themselves through trade, growth could not be infinite. Dearth and poverty win out.
66
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Thomas Tusser 1557

A
  • English agrinomic writer.
  • Fiue hundred pointes of good husbandrie.
  • Inspired by classical texts - Virgil and Palladius on calendrical tasks. Xenophon prescribed ordering one’s household diligently.
67
Q

Key Actors - Classical Economy

Pliny

A
  • Antiquity
  • Decay of the soil did not come from the ageing of soil, but from poor husbandry.
68
Q

What is important to note about the subsistence theory of Smith?

A

‘Subsistence’ will mean different things across the world -> different societies have different ideas of subsistence.

69
Q

What is important to note about stage theory?

A

It suggests that all nations have the capacity to reach the same level - it was not compatible with permanent racial hierarchal theories.

70
Q

What is important to note about wood shortage?

A

It matters as much about types of wood - not just in Spain - and wood is difficult to transport. Local shortage therefore made the sense of ubiquitous shortage greater.

71
Q

What is important to note about the post-15th century state?

A

It took on a far greater legal role - mediating disputes between people on the grounds of access to resources. This arguably followed the expansion of the population; and the greater role of the state over church.

72
Q

What could be one use of Colbert’s investigation in 1669?

A

Allowed the state to accurately account for land for renting purposes - to draw in $$$ to the state.

73
Q

What is important to note about Rock Church and Arthur Standish?

A

Both worked for the state - which wanted to understand its assets for tax and rental purposes.

74
Q

What is an important difference between German states and Britain and France?

A

Germany was landlocked - wood could not be easily imported via the sea (from the Baltic). Smaller states made pressure on domestic (state) supplies even more strained. This was a profitable.

75
Q

What is the essential foundation of Jonsson’s Enlightenment’s Frontier?

A

Natural historians put forward the case that the environment was not self-regulatory, but interference could have ramifications. Classical economists argued that nature was self-regulating, which the state should seek to emulate in state affairs, rather than engaging in a process of economic nationalism.

Essentially, two rival ecologies of commerce: cosmopolitan free trade versus economic nationalism. Different visions of modernity.

76
Q

What is important to note about the Dutch wood supply?

A

Much was imported, which meant the Dutch were defensive about wood supply - resulting in an expanded Navy, ironically consuming most of the wood.

77
Q

Cameralist compendium

  • What did Shroeder state?
  • What did Becher state?
  • What did Seckendorff state?
  • What did Justi state?
  • What did Schlettwein state?
  • What is the Wolffian philosophy?
  • What did the Prussian throne note?
  • What is the essential Cameralist motion?
  • Where did cameralism grow?
A
  • Schroeder: Version of utopia was premised on economic well-being.
  • Becher: Politische Discurs- two primary rules of the state: promotion of populous livelihood, and the attraction of foreigners by the prospect of making a good living.
  • Seckendorff: Fürsten-Stat- begins with the need for a geographical assessment of the land, its fertility and potential, and follows this with a systematic survey and tabulation of the properties of the various sections of the population.
  • Justi: The ultimate purpose of each and every ‘empire and republic; consists in the happiness of the state’, and it is from this principle that all others must be deduced, especially the two leading ones: the manner in which the ruler is to promote the happiness of the state, and the contribution of his subjects to this.
  • Schlettwein: In 1772, outlined a system similar to physiocrats. First, he enumerated the ‘classes of men’ according to their differing relations to the wealth and power of people and sovereign: these are the proprietors of land, the agricultural producers, and the ‘sterile’ class of manufacturers and artisans. It is the cultivators of land who are the original producers of commercial goods; the artisan merely lends the objects supplied to him by agriculture a particular form. Everything depends on the welfare of the cultivators therefor, and wisely conducted government will facilitate the circulation of their products as freely as possible.
  • Additional: Wolffian philosophy adopts a mathematical method for spoken delivery - as mathematics was seen as the foundation for certainty. (i.e. how experts legitimate their authority!
  • 1739-40 - Prussian throne critiqued The Prince (Machiavelli). Friedrich stated: “The interest of a prince is thus to populate a country, to make it flourish, not to devastate and destroy it”
  • 1600s - following Schroeder, belief that ‘without a flourishing population, the revenues of the ruler inexorably decline.’ Solutions to securing rulers power: promotion of the higher strata, gaining trust of common people, plundering the rich’.
  • Essentially -> Cameralist mission -> Increase population to increase revenue + get the subjects of the state to meet each other’s needs.
  • Cameralism developed (potentially accidentally) in northern German Protestant universities - Halle, Frankfurt an de Oder, Rinteln.
78
Q

Karl Apphun

A
  • Venice - unique problem - based on lagoon.
  • Wood needed primarily for ships, in the minds of c.14 legislators.
  • Venetian officials misunderstood “temporary shortages arising from local problems, assumed as a symptom of permanent condition of scarcity”
  • In the name of the common good – imposed ditto di riserva – direct state control on some forests – in special interests of the arsenal – framed in today’s terms as a matter of national security
  • Officials in their written comments emphasised a perpetually short supply of timber – equated threat to security of the community.
  • Karl argues rhetoric of scarcity used by bureaucrats to gain support in the city’s Council of Ten – but those who used it believed it
  • ‘managerial organicism’ of Venice’s forest bureaucracy unlike northern European countries eg. Eng and Netherlands