Classic Study: Raine et al (1997) Flashcards

1
Q

What was the aim of Raine’s study?

A
  • To show that the brains of murderers who pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity were different from the brains of non-murderers
  • To investigate if this abnormality makes them more aggressive and so reduces accountability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who were used in the sample?

A
  • 41 murderers pleading NGRI

- 41 non-murderers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What participant design was used?

A

Matched pairs on sex and age, 6 non-murderers having schizophrenia to match the 6 murderers with schizophrenia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What type of method was used?

A

Lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Briefly describe the procedure of this classic study.

A
  • 10 mins before being given a FDG injection for the PET scan subjects were given practice trials on the continuous performance task
  • 30 secs before the injection, the real CPT task started and were monitored for 32 mins in the PET scan
  • The CPT involved spotting targets on a screen and pressing a button to indicate the target had been recognised
  • Their brains were scanned 10 times at 10 minute intervals to pick up differences in glucose metabolism in the cerebral cortex and sub-cortical layers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the IV and DV?

A
IV = Whether the ppts were murderers or non-murderers
DV = Level of brain activity, measured by level of glucose, in certain areas of the brain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the results of Raine’s study?

A
  • Parietal lobes of murderers had lower activity in both hemispheres than controls with a difference of 0.05 in the left and 0.04 in the right
  • Frontal lobs of murderers had lower activity in both hemispheres than controls with a difference of 0.03 for both
  • Amygdala of murderers had lower activity in left (0.94) compared to 0.97 of non-murderers and greater activity in right (0.88) compared to 0.83 of non-murders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the conclusion based on the parietal lobes.

A

The parietal lobes are responsible for speech and so if there is low activity in this region someone wouldn’t be able to articulate their feelings such as anger and so it gets differed to aggressive acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the conclusion based on the frontal lobes.

A

The frontal lobes are responsible for personality and self-control and so damage to the frontal lobes can result in impulsivity, lack of self control and the inability to modify behaviour which in turn can facilitate aggressive acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the conclusion based on the amygdala.

A

The amygdala plays a role in the recognition of affective and social significant stimuli and so abnormalities could be relevant to a theory of violence based on the findings of reduced autonomic arousal (fight or flight) and lack of fear in offenders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the overall conclusion of this experiment.

A

Violent behaviour is controlled by areas of the brain and that abnormalities to these areas can affect behaviour, even though we can’t be certain that their violent behaviour was caused by these abnormalities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluate the generalisablity using a low point.

A

P - Low
E - Narrow sample of 41 murderers pleading NGRI
E - This is not a large sample and can’t be applied to non-violent offenders pleading NGRI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluate the reliability using 2 high points.

A

P - High
E - Standardised procedure and controlled conditions due to using a PET scan and a 32 min CPT
E - Can be replicated easily
P - High inter-rater
E - PET scans are objective as they produce images
E - These can then be analysed by more than one researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Are there any applications?

A

P - Yes
E - Findings suggest that reduced brain activity in certain areas of the brain may act as a predisposition for violence
E - Violent criminals may therefore be less accountable for their actions which may have importance when their sentence is decided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluate validity using 2 high points.

A

P - High
E - Matching the control group with murderers on mental illnesses, sex and age
E - Reduces ppt variables and so comparisons are more meaningful
P - High
E - Ppts stopped taking medication for 2 weeks prior
E - Nothing would have affect their brain activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluate validity using 2 low points.

A

P - Low ecological
E - CPT was carried out in controlled lab environment
E - May not reflect hwo the brain opperates in real life
P - Low task
E - The CPTs included no violence
E - A violent task would be even more different in display than non-violent

17
Q

Evaluate 2 ethical issues.

A

P - Unethical
E - Went medication free for 2 weeks
E - This may have had a negative impact on their mental health and so compromised protection from harm
P - Unethical
E - Ppts may not have been mentally stable enough to understand what they were agreeing to and may have felt obliged due to being prisoners
E - Compromising their informed consent and right to withdraw