Class, power and crime Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

In what ways do Marxists agree with labelling theory?

A

Law is disproportionate against working class, OC’s cant be taken at face value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In what ways do Marxists criticise labelling theory?

A

Don’t examine wider structures of capitalism i.e. Law enforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do Marxists view society?

A

Capitalism determines superstructure which serve the ruling class and maintain economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Criminogenic

A

Capitalism in its nature produces crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Three ways capitalism may lead to working class crime

A

Poverty
Obtaining consumerism
Alienation and lack of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is crime found in all capitalist society?

A

Crime is a rational response to capitalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Whose interests do law enforcement serve?

A

The capitalists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

East African plantations example

A

Cash tax on East African colonies. Working on the plantations was the only way to make money, so taxing forced people into work and give economic payment as well as cash payment to the British

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What laws are the state reluctant to pass?

A

Regulating business
Threatening profitability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why are some laws passed to seemingly benefit the working class?

A

Health and safety codes are passed which reduces absence for the ruling class to keep the working class in work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does this create?

A

False class consciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Example of a law not rigorously enforced

A

Corporate Homicide Prevention (2007) had one successful prosecution and ignored large numbers of homicide by negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the impact of selective law enforcement?

A

Crime = Working class phenomenon. Divides the class by getting them to blame working-class criminals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do the media and criminologists contribute to the portrayal of criminals?

A

Portray as disturbed and conceal capitalist criminogenic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Positive aspects of Marxism

A

Shows relation between crime and capitalism
Shows links between law makers and law enforcers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 evaluations of Marxism

A

Ignores relationship of crime with a non-class inequality

Overpredicts working class crime

Not all societies have high-crime rates i.e. Japan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How do Neo-Marxists agree with Marxists?

A

Society exploits class and causes conflict based on wealth and power

Laws are in capitalist interests

Capitalism should be replaced by a classless utopia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What way is Marxism deterministic?

A

It sees workers commit crime out of economic frustration and ignores crime caused by anomie, subcultures, labelling and bio/psych factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Voluntaristic

A

Free-will: Criminals are not puppets

20
Q

A fully social theory of deviance: two main sources

A

Unequal distribution of wealth and power

Interactionism and labelling give the meaning of deviance

21
Q

Six aspects of fully social theory of deviance

A

The wider origins of deviance
The immediate origins of deviance
The act itself
The immediate social reaction
The wider social reaction
The impacts of labelling

22
Q

How are crimes committed by the higher classes treated?

A

Less vigorously and with less status as a crime

23
Q

White collar crime

A

Crime committed by individuals or companies for financial gain

24
Q

Occupational crime

A

Personal gain

25
Q

Corporate crime

A

Company gain

26
Q

Example of a harm that doesn’t break the law

A

Failing in terms of codes of practice by government regulations

27
Q

Why is corporate crime more dangerous than street crime?

A

Corporate crime has physical (death), environmental and economic harm. It is widespread and pervasive

28
Q

Financial crime

A

Tax evasion and bribery. Victims include companies and tax payers

29
Q

Crimes against consumers with example

A

False labelling e.g. French silicone company sold dangerous silicone to women

30
Q

Crimes against employees with data

A

Sexual/Racial discrimination, wage law violations
1,100 deaths involve law breaking in work

31
Q

Crimes against the environment with example

A

Illegal pollution and toxic waste dumping
e.g. Volkswagen disguising high emission levels above the US limit

32
Q

State-corporate crime with example

A

Government + Company collaboration to pursue goals
e.g. private companies attached to the US military accused of torturing Iraq detainees during US occupation

33
Q

The invisibility of powerful crime: The Media

A

Little coverage of corporate crime which reinforces working class phenomenon. They describe corporate crime more sanitised e.g. Deaths via work = Accidents

34
Q

Lack of political will

A

Politicians rhetoric of being tough on crime is focused on street crime. The Home Office releases reports of street crime but not corporate crime

35
Q

Complex crimes

A

Corporate crime is more complicated, therefore law enforcement may be unprepared, understaffed and underdeveloped for tackling corporate crime

36
Q

Delabelling

A

Corporate crime is often filtered out of the criminalisation process, such as defining them as civil offences and offering fines instead of criminal sentences

37
Q

Example of de-labelling

A

French authorities provided British with citizens who had secret bank accounts with Swiss subsidiary of HSBC. Tax authorities only charge 1 individual and take no legal action against HSBC

38
Q

Under-reporting

A

Individuals may be unaware of their victimisation and fail to report. They may also feel powerless against large companies to report a corporate crime

39
Q

Why has corporate crime become more visible since 2008?

A

The financial crisis produced campaigns against corporate tax evasion, investigative journalists, ‘whistle-blowers’ in companies and the media.

40
Q

How have neoliberal policies impacted companies?

A

Marketisation and privatisation policies have made companies much closer to people’s lives which increases public scrutiny

41
Q

Strain theory explanation

A

Companies can’t maximise profit legitimately so they do it illegally. They are tempted to law break when conditions become weary. They have willingness to ‘innovate’ when finance drops

42
Q

Differential association explanation

A

Crime culture socialises employees, which they join in the crime such as illegal price fixing
Problems achieving company goals adopt deviant methods and socialise others into this
Business favours competitive employees who are willing to break laws

43
Q

Labelling theory explanation

A

De-labelling. Using lawyers and experts to avoid crime and de-label themselves. Law enforcement are reluctant to deal with corporate crime. OC’s underestimate corporate crime extent

44
Q

Marxism explanation

A

Mystification is spreading the ideas that corporate crime is less harmful than street crime. Sustains illusion that it is the exception rather than norm. Corporations are crimogenic as they use illegitimate means when legitimate means are blocked.
Companies only abide to laws when they are strict e.g. In developing countries, laws are less strict so low wages and exploitation are easier to do.

45
Q

Evaluations of Marxists: Nelken

A

Over-predict business crime. Nelken states it is wrong to assume all businesses would offend

46
Q

Evaluation of Marxists: Non-profit crime

A

Capitalist pursuit of profit doesn’t explain the idea of state agent crime.

47
Q

Evaluation of Marxists: Profit

A

Abiding may be more profitable. Pharmaceutical companies abiding with Drug Administration were able to obtain licences for products in US and access markets in poorer countries.