Class differences in achievement (EXTERNAL) Flashcards
Hubbs-Tait et al
Found that where parents use language that challenges their children to evaluate their own understanding or abilities, cognitive performance improves.
Feinstein
Found that educated parents were more likely to use language that challenged their children.
Argues that parents’ own education is the most important factor affecting children’s achievement.
Bereiter and Engelmann
Claim that the language used in lower class homes is deficient. They describe lower class families as communicating by gestures, single words or disjointed phrases.
Bernstein
Identifies differences between working class and middle class language that influence achievement; restricted code and elaborated code
Douglas
Found that working class parents placed less value on education. As a result, they were less ambitious for their children, gave less encouragement and took less interest in their education. Visited schools less often.
Bernstein and Young
Found middle class mothers are more likely to buy educational toys, books and activities that encourage reasoning skills and stimulate intellectual development.
Sugarman
Argues that working class subculture has four key features that act as a barrier to educational achievement: fatalism, collectivism, immediate gratification, present-time orientation.
Keddie
Describes cultural deprivation as a myth and sees it as a victim blaming explanation. Culturally different not culturally deprived.
Troyna and Williams
Argues that the problem is not the child’s language but the school’s attitude towards it.
Blackstone and Mortimore
Working class parents attend fewer parents’ evenings, not because of lack of interest, but because they work longer or less regular hours or are put off by the school’s middle-class atmosphere.
Howard
Notes that young people from poorer homes have lower intakes of energy, vitamins and minerals which affects health by weakening the immune system and lowering children’s energy levels. = more absences
Wilkinson
Among ten year olds, the lower the social class, the higher the rate of hyperactivity, anxiety and conduct disorders all of which are likely to have a negative effect on the child’s education.
Blanden and Machin
Found that children from low income families were more likely to engage in externalising behaviour (such as fighting and temper tantrums), which are likely to disrupt their schooling.
Bull
“costs of free schooling” where students lack financial support and have to do without equipment and miss out on experiences that would enhance their educational achievement.
Tanner et al
Found that the cost of items such as transport, uniforms, books, computers, calculators, and sports, music and art equipment, places a heavy burden on poor families.