Class 5- Game Theory and War as Bargaining Flashcards

1. Review Prisoner's Dilemma, Chicken and Stag Hunt 2. Sequential Decisions and Credibility 3. Unpredictability 4. How to Think About War 5. War as Bargaining Can you explain the theorized causes of war in Fearon 1995? How can credibility be established? Is it realistic to think that international institutions could decrease the likelihood of war?

1
Q

Nash Equilibrium:

A

no player has an incentive to change their strategy given the strategies chosen by others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pareto Efficient:

A

no other outcome to the game would be better for one player without being worse for the other player(s).

*Sometimes some Pareto Efficient outcomes are more desirable than others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

War

A

An event involving the organized use of military force by at least two parties that satises some minimum threshold of severity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interstate War

A

A war in which the main participants are states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Civil War

A

A war in which the main participants are within the same state, such as the government and a rebel group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What Do States Want Out of War?/ What States fight over

A
  1. Territory
  2. Policies
  3. Regime Type
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What states fight over: Territory

A
  • Out of 155 wars over the last 3 centuries, over half involved conflicts over territory.
    - Sometimes territory contributes to the wealth of a state (Iran’s southern oil elds)
    - Territory can have military or strategic value (Golan Heights on border between Israel and Syria)
    - Territory can have ethnic, cultural, or historical value (Kashmir)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What states fight over: Policies

A

Some states’ policies harm the interests of other states (Afghanistan support of Al Qaeda)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What states fight over: Regime Type

A

The composition of a country’s government may be viewed as a threat to another country (communist regimes during the Cold War)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

War is Costly:

A
  1. Loss of human life
    Wars among states in the 20th century led to 40 million deaths directly from combat and tens of millions more deaths owing to war-related hardships.
    Not to mention those injured, displaced from homes and countries, impoverished, and diseased.
  2. Economic and Military costs
    - By 2010, the US had spent almost $6.7 trillion fighting 10 wars in its history.
    - In 2010, military expenditures by all countries amounted to about $1.6 trillion
    - Wars in the oil-rich Middle East, including the Iran-Iraq War (1980-88), Persian Gulf War (1990-91), Iraq war (2003-10) disrupted the international economy by raising oil prices.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Given that war is costly, why couldn’t states just agree to a peaceful bargain over the object of interest ex ante and avoid the costs of war?

A
  • War As Bargaining
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

War As Bargaining

A

Bargaining Range Diagram in LEcture 5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Take away from War as Bargaining:

A
  • Conflicts of interest are a necessary but not sufficient condition for war to occur.
    - Wars are fought over things: territory, resources, policies, etc.
    - War results in some division of the thing being fought over.
    - Since war is costly, often a peaceful bargain would be strictly preferred to violent conflict
    by both parties ex ante.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly