Class 15 Insider Trading Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How do insiders sell shares?

A

they have a board-approved trading schedule to avoid concerns with insider trading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If insiders cant chose what days they sell shares, how can they still control the market?

A

the insiders can control when they release information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who dont we want trading by?

A

insiders friends and family, bribe situations, anyone that can harm shareholder value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who do we want trading by?

A

Information gatherers and intermediaries (analysts, banks, institutional investors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dirks v. SEC

Facts: Dirks worked at an investment analysis firm. Secrist was a former officer of a company and told Dirks that the company was involved in fraud. Secrist wanted Dirks to investigate and disclose the fraud publicly. Dirks investigated and discussed the info with clients and investors who sold their holdings of the companys securities.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Salman v. United States

Facts: Maher, the insider disclosed info to his brother Michael and Michael told Salman, his brother in law.

I: Does the Dirk personal benefit test include disclosure to relatives even with no direct connection to the insider?

A

yes, the intent to benefit a friend or a relative is sufficient to establish a breach of fiduciary duty for trading purposes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

US v. Martoma

Facts: Martoma managed a medical-focused fund. He hired Dr. Sidney Gilman to consult.
Gilman was in charge of FDA approval for a drug (finish)

I: Does tippee liability apply to Martoma? (Martoma didn’t have a duty)

A

H: yes, a meaningfully close relationship isn’t required, intention to benefit is enough.
R: it is enough under Dirks that the tipper expects to benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dirks v. US was before Reg FD. Would Secrist or Dirks have violated reg FD?

A

Secrist possibly would have violated. It depends on how former executives are classified. What he acting on behalf of an issuer?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did Reg FD help/hurt tipping problems?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Did the government need to show how Maher benefitted from the disclosure?

A

No, its enough with a family relation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly