Class 10 Flashcards
Define non-probability sampling:
a sampling method in which not all members of the population have an equal chance of participating in the study, unlike probability sampling
Researcher selects samples based on the subjective judgment of the researcher rather than random selection
Examples of non-probability sampling:
Convenience, quota, purposive, snowball
Describe grounded theory
- “The methodology involves the construction of hypotheses and theories through the collecting and analysis of data. Grounded theory involves the application of inductive reasoning”
- Theoretical sampling (a nonprobability sampling, a term only for Grounded Theory): the researcher selects participants who can contribute to theory making: selecting homogenous group first, after the information is saturated. Then select different groups until a saturation of information.
- Sample size: normally 20-30 participants may reach a saturation of information
- in grounded theory – if multiple people follow the same protocol, should get same response
- Grounded theory is the highest in reliability in qualitative studies
Phenomenology is:
- “a form of qualitative research that focuses on the study of an individual’s lived experiences within the world”
- long interviews
- sample size can be as low as a few
What is ethnography?
- “a type of qualitative research that involves immersing yourself in a particular community or organization to observe their behavior and interactions up close.”
- Sometimes, the sample size may not be clear in ethnographical study, since the observation is an ongoing process (people may come and go). Some studies include as few as 10 participants
In grounded theory, the coding process may include two types of coding:
Open coding and axial coding
Opening coding:
breaking down, examining, comparing, conceptualizing and categorizing data.
Example: Ask a class “What makes you frustrated?”
Axial coding:
making connections between categories derived from opening coding. (make connection between first and second layer)
“the breaking down of core themes during qualitative data analysis. Axial coding in grounded theory is the process of relating codes to each other, via a combination of inductive and deductive thinking”
Phenomenology involves:
- the data are coded as clusters of meanings to discover the underlying structure or consciousness of human experiences
- Suspending judgment about the natural world to instead focus on analysis of mental experience (“bracketing”). This involves setting aside the question of the real existence of a contemplated object, as well as all other questions about the object’s physical or objective nature.
“For example, the act of seeing a horse qualifies as a mental experience, whether one sees the horse in person, in a dream, or in a hallucination. ‘Bracketing’ the horse suspends any judgment about the horse as object of inquiry, and instead analyses the phenomenon of the horse in the human consciousness” - definition of phenomenology bracketing
The reliability of phenomenology is low compared with other qualitative methods.
T or F?
True; phenomenologist will not say something is true or not true but will study what it means to human consciousness
Neckoway and Brownlee work on attachment theory showing the limitations/conditions under which the theory does not apply; not considered publishable initially because editor wanted it to fit with attachment theory
What type of research and reasoning is this an example of?
Grounded theory using inductive logic (from specific to general) because it showed exceptions to the theory
Two issues in qualitative analysis:
- Over emphasizing the patterns and general themes, while losing the details of the specific situations (overgeneralizing, in my owrds, while Fan calls this ‘holistic fallacy’ but it is not googleable term)
- Over-weighting data from whose who articulate better and under-representing data from those do not – elite bias
Define meta-analysis:
comprises statistical methods for contrasting and combining results from different studies on a specific issue in order to identify patterns among study results, sources of disagreement among those results, or other interesting relationships that may come to light in the context of multiple studies