Civil Procedure Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Civ Pro Issues Checklist

A
  1. Proper Court Preliminary Issues
  2. Pretrial Procedures
  3. Disposition without Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Post-Trial
  6. Appeal
  7. Use of Final Judgment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Proper Court Preliminary Issues Checklist

A
  1. Personal Jurisdiction 2. Subject Matter Jurisdiction 3. Supplemental Jurisdiction 4. Removal and Remand 5. Venue 6. Notice 7. Choice of Law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pretrial Procedures Checklist

A
  1. Pleadings 2. Joinder of Parties 3. Joinder of Claims 4. Class Action 5. Discovery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Disposition without Trial Checklist

A
  1. Dismissal/Default 2. Motion for Summary Judgment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trial Checklist

A
  1. Right to Jury 2. Judgment as a Matter of Law/Directed Verdict in CA
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Post-Trial Checklist

A
  1. Renewed JMOL/JNOV in CA 2. New Trial 3. Motion to Set Aside Judgment 4. Remittitur/Additur
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Appeal Checklist

A

Final Judgment Rule & Exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Use of Final Judgment Checklist

A
  1. Res judicata (claim preclusion) 2. Collateral estoppel (issue preclusion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Personal Jurisdiction (PJ)

A
  1. Tradition bases —Consent —Domiciled in Forum —Present & served 2. Modern: minimum contacts —Long-arm statute AND ——CA: to constitutional limits ——Specific statute: as limited —Nature of contacts ——Purposeful availment ——Foreseeability of being haled into court ——Relatedness ——Essentially at home —Fairness Factors ——Convenience ——State’s interest ——Other interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (SMJ)

A
  1. Federal Question 2. Diversity of Citizenship —Complete diversity required ——Person: domicile ——Corp: may have 2 - incorp state & PPB state (nerve ctr) ——Uninc Assoc: domicile of members ——Alienage: foreign citizen and US citizen —AND exceeds $75K
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CA Subject Matter Jurisdiction (SMJ)

A
  1. Unlimited case: exceeds $25K 2. Limited case: $25K or less 3. Small claims: person $10K, business $5K
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Supplemental Jurisdiction

A
  1. Common nucleus of operative fact 2. Same transaction or occurrence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Removal Jurisdiction

A
  1. Defendants only may remove 2. 30 days - 1 year max
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Remand

A

To state court if removal improper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Venue

A
  1. Claim arose 2. D resides —Fed: any Ds reside, all in same state —CA: any D resides 3. Reside venue definition —Person: domicile —Corp: ——Fed: where subject to PJ ——CA: PPB, or K entered into, performed, or breached 4. Alternative - any D subject to PJ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Transfer of Venue

A
  1. Original venue proper —Fed: could’ve been filed or all consent —CA: interest of justice 2. Original venue improper —Fed: dismiss or transfer —CA: may transfer proper county —Forum Non Conveniens ——CA: interests of justice, public factors, private factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Notice

A
  1. Service of Process 2. Method of Service —Personal Service —Substituted Service: ——CA: must mail too only if personal service can’t be made —Constructive service 3. Service in Foreign Country
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Choice of Law

A
  1. Erie —State substantive law —Fed. procedural law —If unclear: ——outcome determinative test ——balancing test 2. CA conflict of law —Tort: comparative impairment test —K: depends on choice of law clause ——No clause: comparative impairment test ——Yes clause: OK if reasonable basis & no CA conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Federal v. CA Pleading

A

Fed: notice pleading CA: fact pleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Complaint Checklist

A
  1. Identify parties 2. Statement of claim & SMJ 3. Demand for judgment 4. Signature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a motion for a more definite statement in CA?

A

Demurrer

22
Q

What is a motion to strike pleadings in CA?

A

Anti-SLAPP

23
Q

Federal 12(b)6 motions

A
  1. Lack of SMJ 2. Lack of PJ - 1st response or else waived 3. Improper venue - 1st response or else waived 4. Insufficient process - 1st response or else waived 5. Insufficient service of process - 1st response or else waived 6. Failure to state a claim 7. Failure to join an indispensable party
24
Q

CA 1General Demurrer (unlimited cases)

A
  1. fail to state COA 2. lack of SMJ
25
Q

CA Special Demurrer (unlimited cases)

A
  1. uncertain pleading 2. liability theory unclear 3. lack of legal capacity 4. another case exists 5. misjoinder of parties 6. contract pleadings not okay 7. certificate if required
26
Q

CA Motion to Quash

A
  1. lack of PJ 2. insufficient process 3. insufficient service of process
27
Q

Answer

A
  1. Respond 2. Assert affirmative defenses
28
Q

Fed Relation Back Doctrine

A
  1. Claims: Same conduct, transaction, or occurrence 2. Defendants — same conduct, transaction, or occurrence — new party knew of action — would have been named
29
Q

CA: “Doe” Amendments

A
  1. Timely filed 2. Genuine ignorance of: — Identity of party — Facts giving rise to action — Law allows cause of action 3. Ignorance pled 4. 3 years to substitute
30
Q

Joinder of parties - necessary party

A
  1. No complete relief 2. interest harmed 3. Multiple inconsistent obligations
31
Q

When do you join a necessary party?

A

PJ and diversity not destroyed. If can’t join, court may dismiss because indispensible, or proceed without.

32
Q

Impleader

A

D can add a 3d party D

33
Q

Intervention

A

nonparty wants to join

34
Q

Interpleader

A

property holder wants single lawsuit

35
Q

Compulsory v. Permissive Counterclaim

A

Compulsory: 1. same tx or occurrence 2. supplemental jx will extend Permissive: 1. not same tx or occurrence 2. supplemental jx will not extend

36
Q

Cross claim (cross complaint in CA): against co-party

A
  1. Not compulsory 2. Same tx or occurrence 3. Supplemental jx will extend
37
Q

Fed requirements for class actions

A
  1. Numerosity 2. Commonality 3. Typicality 4. Adequacy
38
Q

Fed Class Actions: Type of Class

A
  1. Prejudice 2. Injunctive relief sought 3. Questions of law/fact common to class predominate
39
Q

Fed Class Actions: Citizenship Issues

A
  1. Diversity - named rep 2. Class Action Fairness Act — Any class member diverse — Aggregate exceeds $5M — 100+ class members
40
Q

CA Class Action

A
  • no types 1. Ascertainable class 2. Member community interest — Common questions of law or fact — Adequate representative — Class substanital benefit
41
Q

Rule 26 Mandatory Disclosures

A
  1. Initial disclosures 2. Expert information 3. Pretrial witnesses & documents
42
Q

Discovery Tools

A
  1. Depositions 2. Interrogatories 3. Request for admissions 4. Request to inspect and produce 5. Electronically stored data 6. Physical or mental exams Note: CA limited cases have less discovery
43
Q

Scope of Discovery

A
  1. Need not be admissible 2. No attorney work product
44
Q

Types of dismissal

A
  1. Voluntary 2. Involuntary 3. Failure to state a claim
45
Q

Motion for summary judgment (MSJ)

A

No genuine issue of material fact & entitled to judgment as matter of law

46
Q

Federal v. CA right to jury trial

A

Fed: legal, then equity CA: equity, then legal

47
Q

Judgment as a Matter of Law (CA Directed Verdict)

A

Reasonable people could not disagree

48
Q

Fed Renewed JMOL v. CA JNOV

A

Fed: only allowed if JMOL first CA: not required to file DV first

49
Q

Conditional New Trial on Damages

A

Remittitur: damages too high Additur: damages too low (not allowed in Fed)

50
Q

Final Judgment Rule (FJR) Exceptions

A
  1. injunctions 2. collateral issues 3. multiple claims/parties 4. extraordinary writ 5. certification of class action
51
Q

Res Judicata (claim)

A
  1. Valid final judgment on the merits — Fed: final when rendered — CA: final when appeals done 2. Same P & same D 3. Same claim — Fed: same tx or occurrence — CA: primary rights theory
52
Q

Collateral Estoppel (issue)

A
  1. Valid final judgment on the merits — Fed: final when rendered — CA: final when appeals done 2. Same issue actually litigated 3. Issue was necessarily determed (essential to judgment) 4. Use against party/privity only 5: Use by: — Fed: party or privy only — CA: stranger allowed if fair —— Defensive use - fair opportunity to be heard —— Offensive use - if fair and equitable