Civil Procedure Flashcards
Elements of federal question jurisdiction
- There is a federal question in dispute; and
- Question appears on the face of a well-pleaded complaint
What is diversity jurisdiction and when does it exist?
Jurisdiction based on the parties’ citizenship.
Exists when:
- There is complete diversity between parties (no party is a citizen of the same state as the other party); and
- Amount in controversy is greater than $75,000
How is citizenship for diversity jurisdiction determined for:
- Persons?
- Corporations?
- Persons: where the party is domiciled → where party currently resides and intends to remain indefinitely. Only one domicile allowed.
- Corporations: place of incorporation and/or principal place of business. Can be domiciled in 2 states.
Define
supplemental jurisdiction
Power for courts to hear a claim that does not have SMJ as long as the claim is substantially related to one for which SMJ does exist
When can a case be removed? (generally)
When P could have filed original complaint in federal court (i.e. fed court has FQ, diversity, or supplemental jurisdiction over all claims)
What is the minimum contacts analysis for PJ?
- Did the D purposefully avail himself of the forum (such that it was foreseeable litigation could occur)?
- Would exercise of PJ violate notions of fair play and substantial justice? (If D has minimum contacts, extremely rare for this to defeat PJ)
Define
specific jurisdiction
Exists when the claim is related to D’s contacts in the forum state.
Examples include:
- committing a tortious act in a state
- signing a contract in a state
Where is venue proper?
- District where D resides, if D’s are all residents of the same state;
- District where a substantial portion of events giving rise to the claim occurred; or, if none of these provide basis for venue then →
- Any district that has PJ over any D
Where can a party transfer venue if:
- Original venue was proper?
- Original venue was improper?
- Original proper: As long as the new district would also have proper venue. The transfer will be granted if the new district is more convenient for the suit 28 U.S.C. § 1404
- Original improper: Any district where venue would be proper
How can process be served?
Either:
- In the manner prescribed by the state court in the state where the federal suit has been filed; or
- In the manner prescribed by the state court in the state where D will be served; or
- Serve process in the manner specified in FRCP 4(e)(2)
In a diversity jurisdiction case, assuming state common law and federal law conflict, what is the first step in Erie analysis?
Determine the law behind the primary issue, and determine whether the law is procedural, substantive, or something in the middle.
- If the issue is substantive, apply state law.
- If the law is procedural, apply federal law.
- If the law is something in the middle, proceed to step two.
For Erie analysis, if the law is something in the middle, how do you determine which law to apply?
Ask:
- Outcome determinative test: Does the choice of law impact the outcome of the case? If so, apply state law.
- Forum shopping: Would failing to apply the state law lead more people to want to litigate in federal court ? If so, apply state law.
- Balance of interests: Does the state have a greater interest in having its own law applied than the federal law? If so, apply the state law.
What types of laws are substantive?
- Choice of law
- Statute of limitations
- Elements of a crime or case
- Burdens of proof
Compare procedural and substantive laws
Procedural: Laws that provide the process by which a case will progress. Examples include methods of serving process or time limits for filing motions.
Substantive: Laws that provide a right. Examples include the duty of care or a state privacy law statute.
⚠️ Note: Some laws, such as a statutes of limitations, fall in a grey area between the two. These laws are where most issues with the Erie Doctrine reside. The status of such statutes is dependent on the outcome determinative test (Step 2).
Rule 12(b) grounds for dismissal
- Lack of SMJ;
- Lack of PJ;
- Improper venue;
- Insufficient process;
- Insufficient service of process;
- Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
- Failure to join a party under Rule 19
What is a complaint and what must it contain?
Pleading filed to initiate lawsuit.
Must contain:
- Grounds for SMJ;
- Statement of claim; and
- Demand for relief (damages, equitable relief, etc)
D has ____ days after service of process to file an answer
21
What must an answer contain?
- Admittance or denial of all complaint allegations
- Failure to deny constitutes admission
-
Affirmative defenses (if D fails to raise in answer, they will be waived)
- Self-defense
- Statute of Fraud
- Statute of Limitation
- Contributory negligence
- Claim preclusion
- Fraud
When can a party amend its pleading as a matter of course?
- Parties may amend pleadings once as a matter of course within 21 days of service of process.
- If the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after either responsive pleading or pre-answer motion (whichever came first)
When do amendments adding parties “relate back”?
If:
- Amendment arises out of the same conduct, transaction, or occurence as the original pleading; and
- Within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the new D:
- Received notice & will not be prejudiced; and
- Knew or should have known that the action would have been brought against it, but for a mistake concerning the proper party’s identity (i.e. suit was foreseeable)
A party has ___ days to respond to an amended pleading
14 days after service of the amended pleading or the time remaining for response to the original pleading (whichever is later)
What 12(b) defense is never waived?
Lack of SMJ
When is joinder of additional parties permitted?
Multiple plaintiffs can join a party or sue multiple D’s if:
- P is suing D’s jointly, severally, or in the alternative;
- Claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence; and
- There is a common question of law or fact to all parties joined
What occurs if a necessary party cannot be joined?
The court uses a balancing test to determine whether the suit should be dismissed:
- Would the judgment rendered in the party’s absence prejudice that person or the existing parties?
- Could prejudice be lessened or avoided by:
- protective provisions in the judgment;
- shaping the relief; or
- other measures
- Would a judgment rendered in the person’s absence be adequate?
- Would the plaintiff have an adequate remedy if the action were dismissed?
When is joinder of parties compulsory?
If party is necessary →
- Complete relief cannot be issued in the party’s absence; or
- Failure to join would impede the rights of either that party or existing parties
Define
impleader
When the D adds a third party to the case, alleging third party is responsible for some or all of the liability facing the D (i.e. “It wasn’t my fault, it was his fault”)
(common for indemnity cases & with joint tortfeasers)
What is interpleader and what are the two different types?
Allows a party with multiple, different claims to join all the claimants together.
Types:
- Rule interpleader (FRCP 22)
- Statutory interpleader (28 USC § 1335)
What are the SMJ, PJ, and venue requirements of rule (FRCP 22) interpleader?
- SMJ → Stakeholder must be diverse from every claimant (complete diversity required) and amount in controversy >$75K
- PJ → over all claimants
- Venue → same rules as other federal cases
What are the SMJ, PJ, and venue requirements for statutory interpleader?
- SMJ → one claimant diverse from > one other claimant (only minimal diversity required) and amount in controversy > greater than or equal to $500
- PJ → exists as long as claimants are in the US
- Venue → proper in any district where any claimant resides
What are the general requirements for a Rule 24 intervention?
Permitted when
- Right is granted by federal statute; or
- Party has an interest relating to the subject matter of the action and would not be able protect their interest w/o intervention .
FRCP 24