Civil Procedure Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Transfer of venue

A

To transfer venue, the defendant must show either that venue is improper in the plaintiff’s chosen venue or that venue should be transferred, in the interests of justice, for the convenience of the parties and witnesses. Where venue is proper, transfer may be made to another district in which the action might have been brought or to which all the parties have consented. When venue is improper, transfer must be to a venue where the action could have been brought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where venue is proper

A

Venue is proper in a judicial district in which any defendant resides if all defendants reside in the same state, where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or if neither of these apply, to any district where a defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction for the action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discovery

A

A party may seek to obtain any non privileged material that is relevant to the cause of action and is reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence on a claim or defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Subject matter jurisdiction

A

SMJ refers to the courts ability to hear a type of case. A lack of SMJ is not raised by failing to raise it at trial and it may be raised at any time, including on appeal. There are two main bases for jurisdiction, federal question jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. Each claim asserted in federal court must have either an independent basis for jurisdiction or be within the court’s supplemental jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Supplemental jurisdiction

A

If a court does not have original jurisdiction over a claim, it may be able to hear the claim under its supplemental jurisdiction. A DJ claim will invoke supplemental jurisdiction if it arises from a common nucleus of operative facts as the claim that invokes DJ and where one would normally expect the claims to be tried in the same action. Supplemental jurisdiction cannot be used to override the complete diversity requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Personal jurisdiction

A

Personal jurisdiction refers to the courts ability to exercise power over a particular defendant. Traditionally, personal jurisdiction is based on where a party is domiciled, presence in the forum when served, or consent. An exercise of personal jurisdiction must be authorized by state law through a long arm statute and it must be constitutional. In analyzing the constitutional requirements for jurisdiction, the court will examine the defendants contacts with the forum, the relatedness of the claim to those contacts, and whether jurisdiction over the defendant is fair.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Res Judicata

A

Claim preclusion bars a litigant in a prior action from bringing the same cause of action again. For it to apply, a party must show an earlier, valid judgement on the merits; the cases are brought by the same claimant against the same defendant; the same cause of action or claim is involved in the later suit; the cause of action was actually litigated or could have been litigated.

  • CA’s primary rights doctrine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Collateral Estoppel

A

Issue preclusion estops a party in a prior case from relitigating an issue that was resolved in a prior case and requires a showing that: the first case ended in a valid and final judgement on the merits; the issue was actually litigated and determined in the prior case; that the issue was essential to the prior judgement; and that the issues are identical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Motion for a judgement as a matter of law

A

A judge may grant a motion for judgement as a matter of law when the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the party against whom the verdict would be directed, is such that a reasonable juror could only come to one conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Diversity jurisdiction

A

Federal courts have diversity jurisdiction when the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and the lawsuit is between citizens of different states or citizens of a state and citizen of a foreign country. DJ requires complete diversity between opposing sides and an individual’s citizenship is determined by where they are domiciled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Forum non conveniens

A

Even where venue is proper, the discretionary doctrine of forum non conveniens allows a federal court, for the connivence of the parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, to transfer a civil action to any other district where it might have been brought, or if transfer is not possible, to dismiss the action. Federal courts must evaluate both public and private factors in making this decision. This includes the availability of the forum, the plaintiff’s choice of forum, and the states interest in providing relief. Also included are considerations for connivence of parties and witnesses, location of evidence, and where the cause of action arose. Venue cannot be transferred to a foreign jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Relation back doctrine

A

When the statute of limitations has run, a defendant may be added and the filing of the amended claim will “relate back” to the date the original complaint was filed, when the amended adding the new defendant arises out of the same transaction or occurrence and within 120 days after filing, the newly added defendant received such notice of the action that it would not be prejudiced and that but for the mistake concerning identity, the action would have been brought against it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Timing of removal

A

A case must be removed within 30 days of the date the defendant discovers the case is removable and all defendants must join in the removal. For cases based on diversity, removal may not be had more than one year after the case was filed unless there is a showing of bad faith by the plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Appeals

A

Generally only final orders may be appealable. A party may seek review of certain interlocutory orders when the trial judge certifies that the interlocutory (nonfinal) order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for a difference of opinion and an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation and the court of appeals agrees to allow the appeal. Additionally, a party may seek an extraordinary writ of mandamus or prohibition as a means of review on a showing irreparable harm if the normal appeals process is followed, and the petitioner must show a beneficial interest in the outcome of the writ proceeding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Compulsory joinder

A

Compulsory joinder looks to see if the absentee should be joined, if the absentee can be joined, and if they cannot be joined, whether the action should proceed without the absentee.
The absentee should be joined when complete relief cannot be granted without the absent party, or the absentee has such an interest in the subject matter of the lawsuit that his absence will impair his ability to protect his interest or will leave the other parties at risk of inconsistent obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Supplemental jurisdiction over counterclaims

A

In determining whether a counter claim will fall under the court’s supplemental jurisdiction, the court will determine whether it is a compulsory counterclaim, which by definition falls under the courts supplemental jurisdiction. If the claim is permissive, generally there must be an independent basis for jurisdiction.
A counterclaim is compulsory if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as on of the plaintiff’s claims, and it must be pleaded in the current litigation or be lost. A permissive counter claim is one that does not arise out of same transaction or occurrence and must have its own basis for jurisdiction.

17
Q

Personal jurisdiction - minimum contacts, relatedness to the claim, and fairness

A

Minimum contacts requires a showing of purposeful availment and foreseeability. The courts must find that the defendant purposefully availed herself to the privileges of conducting activities in the forum state, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws. Additionally, the defendant must have foreseen that she would be haled into court in the forum state.

The claim must arise from the defendants contacts with the forum. This requires either a showing of continuous and systematic activity for general jurisdiction or that the claim is related to the defendant’s contacts with the forum for specific jurisdiction.

In determining whether exercising jurisdiction over the defendant is fair, the court will look at the connivence to the defendant, the state’s interests, and other factors.

18
Q

Erie

A

Asks whether a federal court should apply federal or state law in a diversity action. Courts will apply federal procedural law and state substantive law.

  • Federal rule on point and conflicts with state law?
  • Outcome determinative?
  • Federalism concerns?
  • Forum shopping?
19
Q

Removal and remand

A

Removal requires federal subject matter jurisdiction so a removal issue raises subject matter jurisdiction. Only defendants can remove to federal court and all defendants must join in the removal. Removal must be within 30 days of service. Remand is the reverse of removal and is only granted if the federal court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

20
Q

Pleadings

A

Pleadings must contain a short plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a short statement of the claim showing entitlement of relief, and a demand for the relief the pleader seeks.
It must contain facts that render the plaintiff’s entitlement to relief plausible. Courts should disregard legal conclusions and determine whether remaining factual allegations suggest plaintiff has a plausible claim.

CA pleadings require a statement of facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language. Complaints and affirmative defenses must contain ultimate facts, facts that raise the issues upon which recovery depends, and not evidentiary facts or legal conclusions.

21
Q

Doe amendments

A

Doe amendments are permitted in CA if the original complaint is timely filed and contains charging allegations against all defendants, the plaintiff is genuinely ignorant of the identity of a fictitious defendant, the facts giving rise to a cause of action, or the fact that there is a cause of action, plaintiff’s ignorance must be plead in the complaint.

22
Q

Demurrer

A

Demurrers are pleadings and not motions. A general demurrer is a pleading that the compliant fails to state facts sufficient to support a cause of action.
Grounds for special demurrers include: lack of capacity, another pending action between the parties on the same issue, improper joinder of parties, pleadings are uncertain, failure to allege whether contract is oral or written.

23
Q

Anti-SLAPP

A

The anti-SLAPP statute requires that the court determine whether the defendant has made a threshold showing that the challenge cause of action is one arising from protected activity within the meaning of the anti-SLAPP statute; and if the court finds defendant made this showing plaintiff must show they are likely to prevail on the claim.

24
Q

Discovery

A

Fed - Discovery is limited to any non-privileged matter that is relevant to a claim or defense. Work product is discoverable only on a showing of substantial need and to avoid undue hardship.
CA - Discovery is allowed for information that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action. There is an absolute privilege to writings reflecting the attorney’s opinions and research. Qualified work product is only discoverable if a denial of discovery will unfairly prejudice a party in preparing their claim or defense.

25
Q

Summary judgement

A

For summary judgement to be granted, the movant must show there is no genuine issue of material fact and that as a matter of law, the movant prevails.

26
Q

Motion for judgement

A

A motion for judgement may be made after the close of plaintiff’s evidence (by defendant) or at the close of all evidence (by either party). The motion may only be granted if no reasonable person could differ as to the outcome.

27
Q

Motions for a new trial and JNOV

A

These motions are only permitted if the party properly and timely moved for judgement and may only be granted of no reasonable person could differ as to the outcome.

28
Q

Class action

A

Class action requires numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation, plus one of the following: Risk of inconsistent results, injunctive or declaratory relief, or common questions of the class predominate.

29
Q

Waiver of jury trials

A

Right to jury trial can be waived. In federal court, the complaint must contain a demand for jury trial and failure to do so is a waiver. In CA, you must post jury fees before trial and failure to post fees is a wavier.