Civil Procedure Flashcards
What power(s) must a court have for a Plaintiff to bring a case? Over whom and over what must the court have such power(s)?
To bring their case, a plaintiff must find a court that has power over the defendant(s) (“personal jurisdiction”) and power over the type of case (“subject matter jurisdiction”), and the location (“venue”) must be proper.
What are the types of Personal Jurisdiction?
In personam: The forum has personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
In rem: The forum has power to adjudicate rights of all persons as to a particular item of property (the defendant not personally bound).
Quasi in rem (two types): (1) court adjudicates rights of parties in property based on property being in forum; close connection between case and property provides minimum contacts; (2) court attaches property to bring defendant into forum on unrelated claim; defendant must have minimum contacts with forum.
Most, if not all, states authorize jurisdiction over a defendant in what circumstances?
STATUTORY PART OF 2-STEP ANALYSIS
(1) Is present in forum state and personally served with process therein;
(2) Is domiciled in forum state;
(3) Conducts systematic and continuous business in the state such that the defendant is “essentially at home” therein;
(4) Consents to jurisdiction; or
(5) Commits an act covered by the long arm statute.
What is the general framework for a personal jurisdiction analysis?
(1) Does PJ fall within a statute?
(2) Does PJ satisfy the Constitution?
On the exam, if a PJ analysis is required and there is no statute provided, what should you do?
For the first step, indicate that a statute is required for the state to exercise PJ and assume that that step is met.
What is the constitutional question for PJ over a defendant? What are the factors/steps in this constitutional analysis/requirement?
Does the defendant have such minimum contacts with the forum so that jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?
3 Factors/Steps: Contacts, Relatedness, and Fairness.
What makes up the “Contact” Factor of the Constitutional PJ test? What is needed to satisfy it?
Contact(s) result from Purposeful Availment and is/are Foreseeability.
- Purposeful Availment: Purposeful Availment means that the contact between D and the forum state must result from her voluntary act (results from her targeting the forum in some way–causing an effect in the forum; marketing a product; using the roads; Sending a tortious email; etc.).
- Foreseeability: Foreseeability means that D should have known or reasonably anticipated that her activities in the forum made it foreseeable that she could get haled to court there.
What makes up the “Relatedness” Factor of the Constitutional PJ test? What is needed to satisfy it?
If P’s CLAIM is RELATED to D’s CONTACT with the FORUM, a court is more likely to find that jurisdiction as to that claim (SJ) is fair and reasonable.
P’s claim ARISES FROM or RELATES TO D’s contact with the forum (P’s harm was CAUSED by D’s contact with the forum). If D has substantial contacts with the forum, relatedness is satisfied if the claim merely relates to D’s contacts with the forum.
- Yes –> Specific PJ
- No –> If P’s claim is unrelated to D’s contact with the forum, the court must have General PJ over the defendant.
What happens if relatedness is satisfied in the PJ analysis? What if it’s not satisfied?
If the “arise out of or relate to” test is satisfied, the case will be assessed for specific PJ (move on to the fair or reasonable analysis). If the test is NOT satisfied, the only way to proceed is with general PJ. If general PJ exists, then D can be sued in the forum on a claim that arose anywhere in the world.
What makes up the “Fairness” Factor of the Fair (or Reasonable) Constitutional PJ test? What is needed to satisfy it?
Along with Relatedness, when determining whether Specific Jurisdiction is appropriate for D, the court will consider the following Fairness Factors:
(1) The BURDEN ON D and witnesses (D must show that the forum is so “gravely difficult and inconvenient” that it puts her at a “severe disadvantage”–relative wealth is a factor, but not determinative);
(2) FORUM STATE’S INTEREST in providing redress for its citizens (EX: state wants to protect its citizens);
(3) P’S INTEREST (EX: injured and cannot travel);
(4) the interstate judicial system’s interest in EFFICIENCY; and
(5) shared interest of states in furthering SOCIAL POLICIES.
- [THIS IS ONLY FOR SPECIFIC PJ]
What is needed to establish General Personal Jurisdiction over a defendant?
Person:
- “At home” in the forum. The one state where he has a domicile.
- Served with process in the forum while voluntarily there (“tag jurisdiction”).
Business:
- Registered to do business in the state and appointed an agent for service of process there. Assumes that state law authorizes general PJ on that basis (rare).
- Must be “at home” in the forum. (1) the state where it is incorporated; (2) the state where it has its Principal Place of Business (PPB). The PPB is where the business has its “nerve center.”
What is the constitutional standard for Notice? What documents are needed for process?
D is entitled to Notice. Notice must be reasonably calculated under all the circumstances to apprise the interested parties of the action.
- Process: (1) Summons: The formal court notice of suit and telling D when to respond; (2) Copy of the Complaint.
[On bar exam, notice means service of process]
Who can serve process in federal court?
Any person who is (1) at least 18 YEARS OLD and (2) NOT A PARTY to the action.
- Do not need to be appointed by the court.
How long does P have to serve process in the US?
Service must take place within 90 days of filing the complaint (can be extended for good cause).
How can process be served on an individual? (what are the options?)
Options:
- Personal Service (in-hand delivery - anywhere).
- Substituted service at D’s USUAL ABODE on someone of SUITABLE AGE AND DISCRETION who RESIDES THERE.
- Service on Agent (as long as it is within the scope of that agency).
- State Law Methods (methods from both the state where the federal court sits and where service is to be made are fine).
How can process be served on a business organization? (what are the options?)
- On an officer or agent (EX: president; treasurer; secretary)
- State law methods (methods from both the state where the federal court sits and where service is to be made are fine)
What considerations are applied when service is made on a minor or incompetent?
It can be done only by methods permitted by state law (only the state where the service is made).
What is a method for service allowed by international agreement?
- Method that American courts tell you.
- Method allowed by foreign government law.
- Method directed by a foreign official in response to a letter of request (from American court).
- Personal Service in the foreign country (unless prohibited by foreign country’s law).
[Subject to the Constitutional standard]
Can service of process be waived? If so, then how? Does this waive anything else?
P mails to D a notice and request to waive service. Must include copy of complaint, 2 copies of a waiver form, and a pre-paid means of return. If D executes and sends the form back to P within 30 days (60 if D is outside the US), then she has waived formal service of process. P will then file that waiver in court.
NOTE: This does not waive a PJ defense.
- Can be used for individuals and businesses.
If D waives service of process, then when is D considered to have been served with process?
On the day that P files the waiver with the court.
Why might D accept a waiver of service of process?
There is a penalty if you don’t. If D does not have good cause for failing to return the waiver form, they must pay the cost of the service.
Where (in terms of state-boundaries) may process be served?
Within the state in which the federal court sits and outside that state if state law allows.
[Same analysis as with PJ]
What result when a defendant is appearing in another case while a plaintiff is attempting to serve them with process?
D is immune from process while appearing in another case.
Can you serve non-service of process documents by email?
Yes, if the other party agrees.