Civil Pro Flashcards
Personal Jurisdiction: 1. Contact - don’t have to set foot in forum: foreseeability. 2. Relatedness - P’s claim arising from the D’s contact in the forum.
- If voluntary present in state B and served there (subject to general PJ)
- Fairness: Not for General PJ, only for specific PJ -> forum is in a severe disadvantage in the litigation and also state’s interest and P’s interest
- Complaint + Summon = Process -> Within 90 days of filing complaint -> Can serve to substituted man/agent in person (who resides there)
- Service by state law may allow mail or email service (where the federal court sits or where service make)
- For Business or organization: for office, managing or general agent
- Wavier of formed service: complaint + prepaid return method (within 30 days in the US, 60 days in a foreign country) ->If fails without good cause -> D pays the cost of formal service.
- Example: U.S. citizen domiciled in Jpan sues D party of CA in federal court -> No alienage and diversity -> needs intent to remain indefinitely + presence.
- For descendants, minors or incompetents, the representative’s citizenship is irrelevant
- 75000, go with what P claims (can’t aggregate claims from different plaintiffs
- Federal court does not hear divorce, alimony, probate and child custody, but if meet diversity+75000, then can hear
- removal -> within 30 days of service of process. -> 30 days starts again when different co-defendant is served. -> cannot if D is a citizen of the forum AND no removal more than one year after the case filed ->
- Supplemental Jurisdiction: 1. Common nucleus of operative facts (same transaction and occurrence) -> Limitation: in diversity case, claims by plaintiff cannot invoke supplemental jurisdiction.
- Supplemental Jurisdiction can fix 75000. But exception (only apply to diversity cases, if federal question arises, no limitation) : 1. asserted by plaintiff. 2. Diversity of citizenship case 3. 75000 ???? (check)
- In diversity case: Federal court needs to apply choice of law rule
- Venue: No transfer from federal court to state court
- Rule 12(b) Motion Defense: 1. lack of SMJ 2. lac of PJ 3. improper venue 4. Improper process 5. improper service of process. 6. Failure to state claim 7. Failure to join indispensable party (2-5 waviable - must reply in first Rule 12 response in 14 day, 6-7 as late as at trail, no time limit for 1)
- Joinder: - P can join any claims, even unrelated claims: for multiple D, needs same transaction and occurrence + raise one common question of law or facts
- Necessary to join a party if his interests may be harmed if he is not joined
- D’s counter claim -> P must respond within 21 days
- D has a right to implead within 14 days of serving answer, after that, need permission from court (look at citizenship of third party and defendant)
Class Action: - Can settle only with court approval
- Notice: 1. Can opt out 2. bound if not opted out. 3. Can retain individual counsel
- SMJ: 1. Federal law 2. Consider citizenship of representative 3. Representative’s claim exceed $75,000
Expert: 1. Identity 2. Report: a. opinion, and bases for the opinions. 3. facts used to form the opinions, 4. expert’s qualification 5. How much paid
Deposition: - need a subpoena to compel non-party for deposition -> 100 miles unless consent
- If court find information not reasonably accessible because of the cost -> party can still show good cause. -> Court will allocate the cost between parties
- Absolute work product (never discovered): 1. Mental Impressions 2. Opinions 3. Conclusions 4. Legal theories
- Temporary Retraining Order (14 days) -> extendable to 28 days
- Pleadings are not evidence except under oath
Summary Judgement: - Judge do not assess the credibility on summary judgement (first hand knowledge from anyone will suffice)
- Fails to move JMOL -> can’t do RJMOL ->within 28 days after judgement
- Summary Judgement is not final judgement so not appealable.
Preclusion: Preclusion law from law of case 1 court
- Ask: 1. same plaintiff v. same defendant? 2. Valid legal judgement? 3. Majority view: Same transaction and occurrence ? Minority view: Different Primary right? (property v. contract)
- Supplemental Jurisdiction does not apply for non-diversity impleader added claim against 3rd party
- Federal Question cannot be arised from in anticipated from D’s defense, must on the face of P’s complaint
- When transfer on the ground of improper venue, law of transferee court applies
- ESI not producible if not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost
- Expert’s opinion who is not testifying generally not discoverable.
- Physical Examination during Discovery: do not need to submit to exam by another physician without a court order obtained on showing of good causes
- Name, address, telephone numbers -> within 14 days
- JMOL needs to be filed before submitted the case to jury
- Clerk may enter default judgement without noticing the losing party
- Immediately appealbale order: 1. injunction 2. for receivership 3. Decree in admiralty 4. Patent infringement
- If no objection made -> Only appeal with plain error standard of review
- Appeal on JML -> de novo, on motion to new trial -> abuse of discretion
- when plaintiff’s claim wins, cause of action merge into the judgement in later case
- when plaintiff’s claim loses, cause of action is barred
- Supplemental jurisdiction is good unless: asserted by a plaintiff in a diversity case + asserted against citizen of the same state as plaintiff
- Motion for summary judgement -> during discovery or within 30 days after end of discovery
- JMOL -> anytime during trial after party has been fully heard (i.e. no evidence of breach)
- Renew JMOL -> Within 28 days of judgement
- Motion of new trial within 28 days -> if no renew JMOL or Motion for new trial, they can’t raise evidentiary insufficiency on appeal
- Deposition can be used as evidence if witness is unavailable, but objection has to be made in deposition for future objection.
Erie: If the law comes from federal rule of Civil Procedure, Constitution, Federal law -> then federal law trumps over state law
- A cross-claim from defendant usually gets supplemental jurisdiction.
- Case in State A, defendant is state A citizen -> cannot remove based on diversity (Personal Jurisdiction -> contact needs to be related to the claim asserted and contact needs to be purposeful)
- If waive the service of process leads to longer time for serving answer -> 60 days of mailing
- Conversation between expert and attorney is protected except compensation and facts provided by attorney (report draft is protected too)