civil liberties court cases Flashcards

1
Q

Gitlow v New York (1925)

A

Selective Incorporation

SCOTUS says the First Amendment applies to states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

McDonald v Chicago (2010)

A

Selective Incorporation

The Second Amendment that allows the people to keep and bear arms applies to state governments as well as the federal government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Schenck v United States (1919)

A

Free Speech and Free Press

Speech may be punished if it creates a clear and present danger of illegal acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Chaplinsky v New Hampshire (1942)

A

Free Speech and Free Press

Fighting words are not protected by the First Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

New York Times v Sullivan (1964)

A

Free Speech and Free Press

To libel a public figure, there must be “actual malice.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tinker v Des Moines (1969)

A

Free Speech and Free Press

Public school students may wear armbands to class protesting against America’s war in Vietnam when such display does not disrupt class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Miller v California (1973)

A

Free Speech and Free Press

Obscenity defined as appealing to prurient interests of an average person with materials that lack literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Texas v Johnson (1969)

A

Free Speech and Free Press

There may not be a law to ban flag burning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Citizens United v FEC (2010)

A

Free Speech and Free Press

The part of the McCain Feingold campaign finance reform law that prevents corporations and labor unions from spending money on advertisements (independent of political candidates or parties) in political campaigns is unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pierce v Society of Sisters (1928)

A

Religious Freedom

Though states may require public education, they may not require that students attend only public schools.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Everson v Board of Education (1947)

A

Religious Freedom

The wall of separation principle is announced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Engel v Vitale (1962)

A

Religious Freedom

There may not be a prayer, even a nondenominational one, in public schools.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Santa Fe Independent School District v Doe (2000)

A

Religious Freedom

Students may not lead prayers before start of a football game at a public school.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Zelman v Simmons-Harris (2002)

A

Religious Freedom

Voucher plan to pay school bills is upheld.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Burwell v Hobby Lobby (2014)

A

Religious Freedom

Certain companies may be exempt from providing contraceotive coverage in health insurance if that violates their owners’ religious beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mapp v Ohio (1961)

A

Criminal Charges

Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial.

17
Q

Gideon v Wainwright (1964)

A

Criminal Charges

Persons charged with a crime have a right to an attorney even if they cannot afford one.

18
Q

Miranda v Arizona (1960)

A

Criminal Charges

Court describes warning that police must give to arrested persons.

19
Q

United States v Leon (1984)

A

Criminal Charges

Illegally obtained evidence may be used in a trial if it was gathered in good faith without violating the principles of the Mapp decision.

20
Q

Rasul v Bush and Hamdi v Rumsfeld (2004)

A

Criminal Charges

Terrorist detainees must have access to a neutral court to decide whether they are legally held.

21
Q

Hamden v Rumsfeld (2006)

A

Criminal Charges

The executive branch cannot unilaterally set up military commissions to try suspected terrorists: Congress must authorize their creation.

22
Q

Boumedine v Bush (2008)

A

Criminal Charges

Congress may not suspenc the writ of habeas corpus for suspected terrorists held at Guatanamo Bay