civil law Flashcards

1
Q

what’s the difference between criminal and civil law?

A

Criminal law aims to protect the community as a whole, whereas civil law is to protect the individual rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

types of civil law

A
Torts
Contract law
Family law
Employment law
Wills and estates
Company law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

tort law

A

A ‘civil wrong’, examples include negligence and defamation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

contract law

A

covers the legal agreement of a contract and the rights available to a party if a valid contract is broken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is civil law?

A

civil law aims to protect individuals’ rights and restoring individuals to their previous positions if those rights have been infringed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

breach, causation and loss

A

Breach - breaking, or failing to fulfil, a duty or obligation.
Causation - direct link between the actions of the defendant and the loss of the plaintiff.
Loss - harm or damage suffered by a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Restriction on bringing a civil claim to court after a given time.

A

Generally 6 years after breach
Apart from personal injuries (3 years) and defamation (1 year)
Some instances there will be no limitations e.g. psycological harm suffered from sexual abuse
This ensures justice/fairness because it provides certainty to the defendant, avoids delay and the plaintiff cannot wait for D’s financial status to change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

vicarious liability

A

A party is considered responsible for the wrongdoing of another person. Eg) the employer can be held responsible for the employees actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

civil law burden of proof

A

The party which has the responsibility of proving the facts of the case. The burden falls on the plaintiff to prove the wrongdoing of the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Standard of proof

A

In civil law, the degree in which the case must be proven is ‘on the balance of probabilities’,
The plaintiff must prove th

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

burden of proof: counterclaim

A

Counterclaim; a separate claim made in response to the plaintiffs claim; it’s heard at the same time. The wrongdoing may be on both parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Parties to a civil claim

A

It’s important to consider who the plaintiff may be and who the possible defendants may be.
P’s and D’s might be a human being, company, or other bodies such as government agencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Possible plaintiffs

A

The aggrieved party (the person who suffered the loss)
Other victims(secondary losses) such as children
Insurers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aggrieved party

A

The person whose rights have been infringed and who has directly suffered loss. There may be more than one aggrieved person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Representative proceedings

A
Also known as class actions 
Seven or more aggrieved parties making a claim against the same party + legal wrongdoing 
Lead plaintiff: represents the group in the proceedings, others are known as group members
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

other victims

A

Other victims who have indirectly suffered loss or damage may also become a plaintiff.
Examples: someone who witnessed an event and now suffers nervous shock due to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Insurers

A

Right of subrogation: Insurance companies have the right to sue on behalf of the policy holder.
Therefore, an insurer will pay the policyholder and then sue the person who caused the loss or recover their expenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

possible defendants

A
The wrongdoer
Employers - vic liability
Person involved in wrongdoing
Insurers
organisations/companies
The government and government agencies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Wrongdoer

A

person/company that has directly caused the damage or loss to the plaintiff. Could be more than one, for e.g. a plaintiff may sue the hospital, medical care felicity and the doctor(s).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

employers

A

Can be held vicarious liability, which is the legal responsibility of a third party for the wrongful acts of another. Employers have a right, ability and duty to control the activities of their employees.
Must provide safe workplace for employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Negligence

A

An area of tort law, in which a duty of care is breached.

Aims to make sure those who owe a duty of care do not breach it and if so they are responsible for any loss or damage suffered.

Limitations:
Must be initiated within 3 years from when the injury was discovered
6 years to work injuries and transport accident injuries

22
Q

Person involved in wrongdoing

A

A party can be held liable as an accessory, known as accessorial liability.

23
Q

Neighbor principle

A

is someone that is so closely/directly affected by an act, that they should’ve been considered when the act was performed.

24
Q

elements of negligence

A
  1. Duty of care
  2. Beached DOC
  3. Causation: link between the breach and loss
  4. Loss
25
DOC
Duty of care - A legal obligation to take reasonable steps to not cause foreseeable harm of another person. Acceptations Risky recreational activities eg, skydiving Good Samaritans eg, a regular person attempts to save drowning person Donations of food Volunteers
26
breach of duty
Breach of duty - DOC is breached when the defendant fails to do what a reasonable person would have done in the same circumstances. The likely risk of harm The likely seriousness of the harm The burden of taking precautions to avoid the risk of harm (cost/effort)
27
causation
Causation - The direct link between the defendants breach of duty and the plaintiffs loss. On the balance of probability would the plaintiff have suffered the harn is the breach had not occurred?
28
loss
Loss - proven damage or loss suffered by the plaintiff due to breach of DOC. can be physical, mental, financial, or damage to property.
29
defendant can argue either... (2 options)
lack of elements or a specific defence.
30
Lack of elements
Lack of elements - no duty of care was owed (or no neighbour relationship), the duty wasn’t breached and there was no loss or damage occurred, therefore it was caused by other means.
31
voluntary assumption of risk
Dcan
32
voluntary assumption of risk
Voluntary assumption of risk - D can prove the P was fully aware of risk, fully appreciated its nature and willingly accepted the risk. eg) accepting lift with drunk driver, skydiving, horse jockeys. Defence does NOT apply to professional services.
33
contributory negligence
Contributory negligence - plaintiff contributed to their injury/loss caused by Defendant. Reduces amount of damages owed to the P. eg) if a plaintiff was intoxicated when the incident occurred, if the plaintiff cannot rebut this assumption, their damages will be reduced.
34
illegality
Illegality - under common law both P and D are involved in illegal activity and the P is injured due to D’s negligence act, the D may escape liability. The D did not owe the P a duty of care as they were both undertaking an illegal activity which denies claims for negligence. Illegality does not automatically negate a plaintiff's claim under Victorian statute law.
35
Impact of Negligence: Plaintiff
``` Loss of life Permanent physical incapacity Serious physical injury Emotional impact of the breach Loss of wages and livelihood Unemployment Effect on mental health ```
36
Impact of negligence: Defendant
``` Loss of business Public humiliation and loss of reputation Physical injury Costs Need to sell assets ```
37
Impact of negligence: broader society
``` Social impact, (burden on families, workplaces) Psychological impact (loss of faith in individuals and institutions) Impact on the legal system (delays, costs, pressure) ```
38
defamation
Defamation - Defamation is a tort which protects the reputation of individuals against a written or oral statement. Right to freedom of speech. Two categories of defamation under common law… 1. Libel: written statement made in permanent form (newspaper, radio or email) 2. Slander: verbal statement made in non-permanent form; word-of mouth.
39
elements of defamation
Elements of defamation - 1. The statement was defamatory (untrue) 2. The statement identified the plaintiff 3. Publication of the defamatory statement Element 1 - Defamatory: lowers a persons reputation or standing in the community Element 2 - identification: statement refers to the plaintiff, it way not have had a name mentioned but would reasonably conclude it’s about the plaintiff. Element 3 - publication: written or verbal statement was published to a person )other than the plaintiff) by the defendant. People who republish the statement can be sued, despite the fact they didn't start it.
40
defamation defenses
``` Defamation defences: Justification Honest opinion Absolute privilege Qualified privilege Contextual truth Fair report of proceedings of public concern Triviality Innocent dissemination ```
41
When being sued for defamation, the defendant can claim one of the following.
Lack of elements Limitation of actions (1 year from the date of publishment) A specific defence
42
Justification
Justification - D can prove the defamatory statement was true
43
honest opinion
Honest opinion - an expression of their honest opinion as a commentator, comment must be of public interest and based on proper material. eg) a food critic
44
Absolute privilege
Absolute privilege - when the statement was made in parliament, courts, or tribunals. Section 49 of the constitution and section 16 of the parliamentary privileges act 1987.
45
Qualified privilege
Qualified privilege - under common law, a moral of legal interest in receiving the information, acts without malice or spite, and acts reasonably in the circumstances. eg) parent/teacher interviews.
46
Contextual truth
Contextual truth - statement is substantially true, although there may be some inaccuracies. (core issue is true)
47
Fair report of proceedings of public concern
Fair report of proceedings of public concern - a fair report of proceedings published for the public or educational purposes.
48
Triviality
Triviality - the plaintiff is unlikely to suffer harm from the minor matter.
49
Innocent dissemination
Innocent dissemination - unknowingly distribute defamatory information.
50
Impact on plaintiff
``` Loss of reputation Emotional impact of defamatory material Loss of wages and livelihood Unemployment If P loses, P pays for D’s legal costs ```
51
Impact on defendant
Costs (if D loses they have to pay remedy, legal fees of the P and own fees) Need to sell assets Public humiliation