Civ Pro - Rule 39 (Execution, Satisfaction, & Effect of Judgments) Flashcards
is the remedy afforded for the satisfaction
of a judgment.
execution
Its object being to obtain satisfaction of the
judgment on which the writ is issued
execution
It is the fruit and end of the suit, and is the life of the law
execution
what are the part of the judgment to be executed
fallo (dispositive portion)
- DP/F of the judgment is the part which subject to execution under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.
Jurisprudence considers this portion of the
judgment as that which finally vests rights upon the parties, sets conditions for the exercise of those rights, and imposes the corresponding duties and obligations.
dispositive portion / fallo
When execution shall issue
- upon finality of judgment
- GEN: not allowed to object execution
EXC terms of judgment are unclear and remains room for interpretation
REM: adverse seek stay of execution or quashal of the writ of execution
==================================
- It is settled that upon the finality of the judgment, the prevailing party in entitled, as a matter of right, to a writ of execution to enforce the judgment, the issuance of which is a ministerial duty of the court (Calilung v. Paramount Insurance Corporation, G.R. No. 195641, February 3, 2016).
- As a rule, parties are not allowed to object to the execution of a final judgment. One exception is when the terms of the judgment are not clear enough and there remains
room for interpretation. If the exception applies, the adverse party may seek the stay of execution or the quashal of the writ of execution (Orix Metro Leasing and Finance Corporation v. Cardline, Inc., G.R. No. 201417, January 13, 2016).
The right to execution is compellable by ________. This is in accordance with the doctrine of __________________________, which states that, as a rule, a judgment that has become final and executory is immutable and unalterable, and may no longer be modified in any respect
mandamus
of immutability of final judgments
how execution shall issue
[1]
- issued as a matter of right on motion. motion before issuance
[2]
- judgments which are immediately executory needs motion
- notice to adverse party
- wrong to argue that decision approving parties’ compromise is immediately executory without need to file motion
==================
1. Execution shall issue as a matter of right on motion. This is plain from the tenor of Sec. 1 of Rule 39. There is, therefore, a need to file a motion before the issuance of a writ
of execution
Hence, a judge may not order execution of the judgment in the decision itself (Lou v. Siapno, 335 SCRA 181, 187).
- In Lou v. Siapno, ibid., the Court declared that, even in judgments which are immediately executory, “there must be a motion to that effect and a hearing called for the purpose.” Also, “under Supreme Court Circular No. 24-94, a motion for the issuance of a writ of execution must contain a
notice to the adverse party” (Pallada u. Regional Trial Court of Kalibo) Thus, in one more recent pronouncement, the Court explicitly ruled that it was wrong for a petitioner’s counsel to argue that since the decision approving the parties’ compromise was immediately executory, there was no need to file a motion for execution - Because of the present phraseology of Sec. 1 of Rule 39, rulings like those made in De Mesa v. Court of Appeals to the effect that where execution is a matter of right, the judgment debtor need not be given an advanced notice of the application for execution nor be afforded a prior hearing thereon, must necessarily be deemed superseded.
first five years of the 10
filing of motion of execution
fail to file motion what if 5 years has lapsed, what now? pg 712
revival of judgment
- refiling of an independent action
- venue should be the same court (real actions)
- venue should be in the resident of the plaintiff/defendant (personal action)
fail to file revival of judgment after 10 years?
no more execution.
when is judgment final & executory?
15 after notice of parties AND the act of the entry of judgment in the book is a mere confirmation (long standing pronouncement decision)
why 15 days?
allow party to challenge the decision via ordinary appeal
grounds for motion for recon KNOWLEDGE CHECK (not mandatory when availing)
judgment is finding of damage is excessive
- evidence is sufficient
- contrary
addressed to the court officer to implement who is the sheriff
writ of execution
if the fallo or writ of execution is ambiguous (pg 555-back track)
clarificatory judgment
forcible entry case > special rules court can entertain ownership only when it is indispensible, filing a separate action
with respect to issue with ownership, forcible entry
conclsuivenes of judgment does not apply
where application for execution made
[1]
- execution applied in court of origin
- perfected appeal and finally resolved, execution applied in the court of origin on motion
[2]
- filing motion for execution of appealed decision no need to wait for records of the case to be remanded to court of origin
- what is required is appeal perfected and finally resolved before execution applied for
bc judgment obligee files motion for exec in court of origin and all he is to do is to attach certified true copies of:
- judgment by appellate court
- entry of said judgment w/ notice to adverse party
[3]
- if execution cannot be carried out promptly in the court of origin, judgment obligee may file a motion with the appellate court to direct the court of origin to issue the writ of execution
==================
1. Execution shall be applied for in the court of origin. If an appeal has been duly perfected and finally resolved, the execution may be applied for also in the court of origin on motion of the judgment obligee (Sec. 1, Rule 39,)
- In filing a motion for execution of an appealed decision, there is no need to wait for the records of the case to be remanded to the court of origin. All that is required is for
the appeal to have been duly perfected and finally resolved before execution may be applied for (Bergonia v. Decano)
This is because when the judgment obligee
files a motion for execution in the court of origin, all he has to do is to attach the certified true copies of (a) the judgment
of the appellate court, and (b) the entry of the said judgment, with notice to the adverse party (Sec. 1, Rule 39,) even if the records have not as yet been remanded to the court of origin. This procedure prevents needless delays in the execution of the judgment.
- If for whatever reason, execution cannot be had with dispatch in the court of origin, the new rules, likewise, afford the judgment obligee a remedy. He may file a motion with the appellate court to direct the court of origin, in the interest of justice, to issue the writ of execution (Sec. 1, Rule 39
can you appeal from an order of execution? how about judgment? final order?
appeal: judgment & final order
no appeal: order of execution
A party desiring to assail an order of execution may instead file an appropriate special civil action under Rule 65
what is the form and contents of writ of execution
The writ of execution is issued in the name of the Republic of the Philippines and shall state:
- (a) the name of the court which granted the motion,
- (b) the case number and title,
- (c) the dispositive portion of the judgment or order subject of the execution, and
- (d) shall require the sheriff or other proper officer to whom it is directed to enforce the writ according to its terms (Sec. 8, Rule 39
A sheriffs duty in the execution of a writ is purely _______; he is to execute the order of the court strictly to the letter
ministerial
He has no discretion whether to execute the
judgment or not
A writ of execution derives its validity from the _______ it seeks to enforce.
Hence, it should not vary the terms or go beyond its terms.
The general rule is that the writ of execution should conform to the dispositive portion of the decision to be executed, and that the execution is ___ if it is in excess of and beyond the original judgment or award
judgment
void
B’s judgment did not contain payment of interest but later on the writ of execution did. Which shall prevail?
The judgment shall prevail.
The writ of execution is void.
if the judgment does not provide for the payment of interest, the writ of execution cannot modify the judgment by requiring the judgment obligor to pay interest. That part of
the writ imposing interest is void
what is the life time of the writ of execution?
how can it be enforced?
the writ is enforceable within the five-year period from entry of judgment (s6, r39)
within that period, the writ may be enforced by motion.
When shall execution be denied?
The trial court may refuse to have the judgment executed in certain cases, as
a. When the judgment has already been executed by the voluntary compliance thereof by the parties
(b) When the judgment has been novated by the parties
[instead of 5 mil immediately, it’s by installment]
(c) When a petition for relief is filed and a
preliminary injunction is granted in accordance with Sec. 5 of Rule 38. Also, when execution of the judgment is enjoined (restrained) by a higher court
[exc to judicial stability: coordinate courts may interfere]
(d) When the judgment sought to be executed
is conditional or when the judgment sought
to be executed is incomplete
(e) When facts and circumstances transpire which would render execution inequitable or unjust
(f) When execution is sought more than five years from its entry without the judgment having been revived
(g) When execution is sought against property
exempt from execution
(h) When refusal to execute the judgment has
become imperative in the higher interest of justice
=======================
a. There is no need for execution in this case
because the judgment has already been satisfied by the voluntary act of the parties. This is a situation where there is a satisfaction of the judgment without need for a writ of execution issued by the court.
b. The parties, despite the existence of a
judgment, are at liberty to novate a judgment by entering into a compromise. A compromise is a contract recognized by substantive law
c. If a higher court issues an injunction to stop or prevent the execution of a judgment ordered by a lower court, it means that the enforcement of the judgment is put on hold until the higher court has had an opportunity to review the case or the issues raised.
d. A court orders the payment of damages, but the exact amount is contingent on the resolution of a related dispute. Until the related issue is resolved, the judgment is incomplete, and execution may be delayed.
e. The judgment involves the eviction of a tenant, but after the judgment, it is discovered that the tenant has nowhere else to go due to unforeseen circumstances. In such a case, execution may be delayed or modified to prevent undue hardship.
There maybe instances, however, when errors may be committed prejudicial to the rights of a party and do call for correction by a superior court. In these exceptional circumstances, considerations of justice and equity dictate
that there be some mode available to the party aggrieved of elevating the question to a higher court. That mode of elevation may be either by appeal or by a special civil action of:
mandamus
prohibition
certiorari
exceptional circumstances that may prevent the execution of a judgment or allow the quashal of a writ of execution already issued. Examples of these grounds are:
(a) when the writ of execution varies the judgment;
(b) when there has been a change in the situation of the parties making execution inequitable or unjust;
(c) when execution is sought to be enforced against property exempt from execution;
(d) when it appears that the controversy has never been submitted to the judgment of the court;
(e) when the terms of the judgment are not clear enough and there remains room for interpretation thereof;
(f) when it appears that the writ of execution has been improvidently issued;
(g) when it appears that the writ of execution is
defective in substance, or is issued against the wrong party, or that the judgment debt has been paid or otherwise satisfied, or the writ was issued without authority
bonus ground:
- A recent case reiterates the above rule and adds that payment or satisfaction of the judgment debt also constitutes a ground
for the quashal of the writ of execution already issued
- ================
d. if there was a procedural error, such as a lack of proper service of summons or notice, and it is later discovered that a party did not have a fair opportunity to present its case, the court might consider quashing the writ of execution.
execution being denied
DISTINGUSH
quashal of writ of execution
Execution Being Denied
- after judgment is final & executory
- trial court refuse judgment executed in cases
- execution denied
Quashal of writ of Execution
- set aside (quashal) of writ (writ focused)
Modes of execution of a judgment
- There are two modes of executing a final and
executory judgment, to wit:
(a) execution by motion if the enforcement of the judgment is sought within five years from the date of its entry; and
(b) execution by independent action if the five-year period has elapsed and before it is barred by the statute of limitations (Sec. 6, Rule 39)
After the lapse of the five-year period, the judgment is no longer enforceable through a motion for a writ of execution. Instead, it is reduced to a __
mere right of action