Civ Pro - Rule 39 (Execution, Satisfaction, & Effect of Judgments) Flashcards
is the remedy afforded for the satisfaction
of a judgment.
execution
Its object being to obtain satisfaction of the
judgment on which the writ is issued
execution
It is the fruit and end of the suit, and is the life of the law
execution
what are the part of the judgment to be executed
fallo (dispositive portion)
- DP/F of the judgment is the part which subject to execution under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.
Jurisprudence considers this portion of the
judgment as that which finally vests rights upon the parties, sets conditions for the exercise of those rights, and imposes the corresponding duties and obligations.
dispositive portion / fallo
When execution shall issue
- upon finality of judgment
- GEN: not allowed to object execution
EXC terms of judgment are unclear and remains room for interpretation
REM: adverse seek stay of execution or quashal of the writ of execution
==================================
- It is settled that upon the finality of the judgment, the prevailing party in entitled, as a matter of right, to a writ of execution to enforce the judgment, the issuance of which is a ministerial duty of the court (Calilung v. Paramount Insurance Corporation, G.R. No. 195641, February 3, 2016).
- As a rule, parties are not allowed to object to the execution of a final judgment. One exception is when the terms of the judgment are not clear enough and there remains
room for interpretation. If the exception applies, the adverse party may seek the stay of execution or the quashal of the writ of execution (Orix Metro Leasing and Finance Corporation v. Cardline, Inc., G.R. No. 201417, January 13, 2016).
The right to execution is compellable by ________. This is in accordance with the doctrine of __________________________, which states that, as a rule, a judgment that has become final and executory is immutable and unalterable, and may no longer be modified in any respect
mandamus
of immutability of final judgments
how execution shall issue
[1]
- issued as a matter of right on motion. motion before issuance
[2]
- judgments which are immediately executory needs motion
- notice to adverse party
- wrong to argue that decision approving parties’ compromise is immediately executory without need to file motion
==================
1. Execution shall issue as a matter of right on motion. This is plain from the tenor of Sec. 1 of Rule 39. There is, therefore, a need to file a motion before the issuance of a writ
of execution
Hence, a judge may not order execution of the judgment in the decision itself (Lou v. Siapno, 335 SCRA 181, 187).
- In Lou v. Siapno, ibid., the Court declared that, even in judgments which are immediately executory, “there must be a motion to that effect and a hearing called for the purpose.” Also, “under Supreme Court Circular No. 24-94, a motion for the issuance of a writ of execution must contain a
notice to the adverse party” (Pallada u. Regional Trial Court of Kalibo) Thus, in one more recent pronouncement, the Court explicitly ruled that it was wrong for a petitioner’s counsel to argue that since the decision approving the parties’ compromise was immediately executory, there was no need to file a motion for execution - Because of the present phraseology of Sec. 1 of Rule 39, rulings like those made in De Mesa v. Court of Appeals to the effect that where execution is a matter of right, the judgment debtor need not be given an advanced notice of the application for execution nor be afforded a prior hearing thereon, must necessarily be deemed superseded.
first five years of the 10
filing of motion of execution
fail to file motion what if 5 years has lapsed, what now? pg 712
revival of judgment
- refiling of an independent action
- venue should be the same court (real actions)
- venue should be in the resident of the plaintiff/defendant (personal action)
fail to file revival of judgment after 10 years?
no more execution.
when is judgment final & executory?
15 after notice of parties AND the act of the entry of judgment in the book is a mere confirmation (long standing pronouncement decision)
why 15 days?
allow party to challenge the decision via ordinary appeal
grounds for motion for recon KNOWLEDGE CHECK (not mandatory when availing)
judgment is finding of damage is excessive
- evidence is sufficient
- contrary
addressed to the court officer to implement who is the sheriff
writ of execution
if the fallo or writ of execution is ambiguous (pg 555-back track)
clarificatory judgment
forcible entry case > special rules court can entertain ownership only when it is indispensible, filing a separate action
with respect to issue with ownership, forcible entry
conclsuivenes of judgment does not apply
where application for execution made
[1]
- execution applied in court of origin
- perfected appeal and finally resolved, execution applied in the court of origin on motion
[2]
- filing motion for execution of appealed decision no need to wait for records of the case to be remanded to court of origin
- what is required is appeal perfected and finally resolved before execution applied for
bc judgment obligee files motion for exec in court of origin and all he is to do is to attach certified true copies of:
- judgment by appellate court
- entry of said judgment w/ notice to adverse party
[3]
- if execution cannot be carried out promptly in the court of origin, judgment obligee may file a motion with the appellate court to direct the court of origin to issue the writ of execution
==================
1. Execution shall be applied for in the court of origin. If an appeal has been duly perfected and finally resolved, the execution may be applied for also in the court of origin on motion of the judgment obligee (Sec. 1, Rule 39,)
- In filing a motion for execution of an appealed decision, there is no need to wait for the records of the case to be remanded to the court of origin. All that is required is for
the appeal to have been duly perfected and finally resolved before execution may be applied for (Bergonia v. Decano)
This is because when the judgment obligee
files a motion for execution in the court of origin, all he has to do is to attach the certified true copies of (a) the judgment
of the appellate court, and (b) the entry of the said judgment, with notice to the adverse party (Sec. 1, Rule 39,) even if the records have not as yet been remanded to the court of origin. This procedure prevents needless delays in the execution of the judgment.
- If for whatever reason, execution cannot be had with dispatch in the court of origin, the new rules, likewise, afford the judgment obligee a remedy. He may file a motion with the appellate court to direct the court of origin, in the interest of justice, to issue the writ of execution (Sec. 1, Rule 39
can you appeal from an order of execution? how about judgment? final order?
appeal: judgment & final order
no appeal: order of execution
A party desiring to assail an order of execution may instead file an appropriate special civil action under Rule 65
what is the form and contents of writ of execution
The writ of execution is issued in the name of the Republic of the Philippines and shall state:
- (a) the name of the court which granted the motion,
- (b) the case number and title,
- (c) the dispositive portion of the judgment or order subject of the execution, and
- (d) shall require the sheriff or other proper officer to whom it is directed to enforce the writ according to its terms (Sec. 8, Rule 39
A sheriffs duty in the execution of a writ is purely _______; he is to execute the order of the court strictly to the letter
ministerial
He has no discretion whether to execute the
judgment or not
A writ of execution derives its validity from the _______ it seeks to enforce.
Hence, it should not vary the terms or go beyond its terms.
The general rule is that the writ of execution should conform to the dispositive portion of the decision to be executed, and that the execution is ___ if it is in excess of and beyond the original judgment or award
judgment
void
B’s judgment did not contain payment of interest but later on the writ of execution did. Which shall prevail?
The judgment shall prevail.
The writ of execution is void.
if the judgment does not provide for the payment of interest, the writ of execution cannot modify the judgment by requiring the judgment obligor to pay interest. That part of
the writ imposing interest is void
what is the life time of the writ of execution?
how can it be enforced?
the writ is enforceable within the five-year period from entry of judgment (s6, r39)
within that period, the writ may be enforced by motion.