Civ Pro Flashcards
What is the difference between a federal court’s subject matter jx and a state court’s SMJ?
Federal courts have LIMITED smj State courts have UNLIMITED smj (assume state courts always have jx over any kind of case unless given a contrary statute)
Can either party waive the lack of SMJ?
NO!!! lack of SMJ cannot be waived by failing to object or by affirmative consent
When can lack of SMJ be raised? By who can it be raised?
Lack of SMJ can be raised by ANY PARTY (P, court, D) at ANY TIME (even on appeal)
What are the two ways to get SMJ?
Federal question jx diversity jx
What is federal question jx?
To what does one look to determine whether it exists?
FEDERAL QUESTION JX = You have SMJ for a claim ARISING UNDER FEDERAL LAW
TO FIND: Look at the face of PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
- only P’s claims count: EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL DEFENSE IS IRRELEVANT
When does a federal court have diversity jx? Exceptions?
Diversity jx exists when case is between:
- citizens of different states, or
- citizens of a state and a foreign country, AND amount in controversy (AIC) exceeds $75,000
EXCEPTIONS—even if diversity exists, can’t use it for:
- probate actions (wills) and
- domestic relations actions
What does it mean for there to be complete diversity? Are there exceptions to the requirement of complete diversity?
ALL plaintiffs must be diverse from ALL defendants
Minimal diversity = any P is diverse from any D, even if others overlap
Minimal diversity is acceptable in certain situations:
- Federal Interpleader Act
- Class actions with claims more than $5 million
- Interstate mass torts if:
- at least 75 people have died in one accident AND
- Ds are from many different states
When must complete diversity exist?
when complaint is FILED (it’s fine if diversity doesn’t exist when cause of action arose or when case comes to trial)
How do you determine an individual’s citizenship for a diversity action? an alien?
an individual is the citizen of a state/country of DOMICILE:
- DOMICILE = US citizen + permanent residency
- permanent resident = residency + intent to remain indefinitely there
- If ALIEN (citizen of foreign nation): citizen of foreign country
- if permanent resident, treat as citizen of state in which she’s domiciled
What rules apply in determining diversity regarding a representative party?
Citizenship of representative party controls
EXCEPTIONS
- for litigation re: decedent’s estate, citizenship of decedent controls
- for guardian/rep of minor/incomptent, infant’s/incompetent’s citizenship controls
What rules apply in determining diversity regarding a class action?
citizenship of NAMED or REPRESENTATIVE PARTIES count
unnamed class members can join without regard to citizenship
What rules apply in determining diversity regarding a corporation?
can have SEVERAL CITIZENSHIPS AT ONCE
citizen of:
- state/states/nations where it’s INCORPORATED
- state/nation where it has its PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS (hq(s))
What happens if Plaintiff is from maryland and D is a corporation incorporated in DE and NY with its PPB in MD?
NO DIVERSITY! Must check EVERY citizenship
What rules apply in determining diversity regarding a partnership or an unincorporated association? to what does this rule apply?
a partnership/unincorporated association is a citizen of EVERY STATE OF WHICH ITS MEMBERS ARE CITIZENS applies to partnerships, LLPs, trade assns, and unions
What are devices available to create/destroy diversity? When are these permissible?
these are okay as long as they are NOT SHAMS OR FRAUDULENT:
- moving (even if it’s done with purpose of affecting diversity, just has to be genuine change in domicile)
- assignment of claim: permitted as long as real (i.e., for VALUE) and complete (not COLLUSIVE)
- NB: partial assignment for debt collection does NOT affect citizenship if assignor retains interest in claim
What amount is required to have diversity jx? Does it need to be proven?
must EXCEED $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs
any GOOD FAITH allegation will suffice
- only when it appears to a LEGAL CERTAINTY that AIC will not be met will it be dismissed
When is aggregation of claims allowed in order to get diversity jx?
1 P v. 1 D: Allowed, regardless of claims’ relatedness
1 P v. 2+ Ds: P cannot aggregate claims against different Ds (NEED $75k for EACH D)
2+ Ps v. 1D: Ps cannot aggregate claims against D (could use supplement jx though)
What’s the difference between removal and transfer?
Removal = state to federal
transfer = from one fed court to another fed court
When is removal proper?
Who can remove?
If multiple Ds, what happens?
Anything extra if removal based on diversity jx?
Time limits on removal?
REMOVAL IS PROPER WHEN case could have been brought ORIGINALLY in fed court (P WOULD HAVE HAD SMJ)
- ONLY Ds can remove
- all Ds consented to removal within 30 days
- IF BASED ON DIVERSITY:
- diversity jx reqs are met
- brought in state in which NO Ds ARE CITIZENS
- removal is brought within one year of commencement of action
- UNLESS P’S BAD FAITH MADE IT UNREMOVABLE
What happens when a D removes?
- notice of removal is filed in federal court, with a copy to state court
- state court’s jx ends AUTOMATICALLY
- P can file in FEDERAL COURT for remand, and federal court hears that
What is the basic rule of supplemental jx? Is a court required to hear a case over which it has supplemental jx?
Allows a federal court with SMJ to hear additional claims that don’t independently have SMJ if ALL CLAIMS CONSTITUTE SAME CASE/CONTROVERSY
- same case/controversy = arise out of same transaction or occurrence
- DISCRETIONARY
What limits apply to supplemental jx in a diversity jx case?
Must still be same case/controversy
NO SUPP JUR over:
- claims by Ps against persons made party under r. 14, 19, 20, 24
- claims by parties seeking to intervene as Ps under r24
- claims by parties proposed to be joined as Ps under r19
- (basically any PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST NEW/ADDED Ds)
- Claims by Ds ARE JUST FINE!
When can a counterclaim in a diversity action be allowed under supplemental jx?
IF COMPULSORY (i.e., arising out of same case/controversy), then fine if by D (because no limits) IF PERMISSIVE (different occurrence): not allowed under supp jur
When can a cross claim (p v. p or d v. d) in a diversity action be allowed under supp jx?
Must arise out of transaction or occurrence that’s subject of action or of counterclaim can’t be brought by P against new party
When is supp jx allowed in cases of multiple Ps against a single D?
since a single D is not made a party under rules 14/19/20/24, then multiple Ps can bringin RELATED claims against D even if they don’t satisfy AIC reqs
What are the two questions one must always ask when evaluating whether a court has PJ over a defendant? (REMEMBER FOR ESSAYS)
- has the basis for exercising PJ over an out-of-state defendant been authorized by statute (typically long arm) or rule of court?
- Is the particular basis for PJ permitted by the due process clause of the US Constitution?
What are the constitutional limits under the DP clause of a court exercising PJ?
DP requires MINIMUM CONTACTS between DEFENDANT and forum state such that it’s consistent with TRADITIONAL NOTIONS of FAIR PLAY and SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE to sue D there.
Minimum contacts = PURPOSEFUL AVAILMENT BY DEFENDANT of protections of forum’s law.
Can one waive objection to lack of PJ?
YES! by either:
- under federal rules, lack of PJ is waived if not raised AT FIRST OPPORTUNITY
- (either pre-answer motion or answer)
- OR SUBSTANTIAL PARTICIPATION ON THE MERITS waives PJ objection
- (same thing, basically)
What’s the difference between general and specific in personam jx?
general = ANY CLAIM WHATSOEVER
specific = P’s claims against D must arise out of/directly relate to D’S CONTACTS WITH FORUM
- governed by long arm statute
What are the bases for general in personam PJ?
- physical PRESENCE within state
- –exception: if only there to answer SUMMONS
- –exception: brought to state by FORCE or FRAUD
- DOMICILE
- independent of physical presence
- CONSENT
- can be given by K as long as reasonable
- corporations when AT HOME in forum state = -
- INCORPORATION
- PPB
- mayyyyybe when operations there are so CONTINUOUS AND SYSTEMATIC as to make it at home (but hasn’t happened yet)
- merely doing business is not enough
How does a court get specific in personam PJ over a D?
STATE LONG ARM STATUTES cover basically everything, as long as the claim ARISES OUT OF THE TRANSACTION INVOLVING THAT STATE
READ THE STATUTE!!
When does a federal court have broader PJ than its state courts?
- Federal Interpleader Act (statutory interpleader): sometimes congress authorizes NATIONWIDE service of process
- BULGE provision of federal rules: allows service 100 MILES of federal courthouse in two situations:
- impleading third-party Ds under R14
- joining necessary parties under R19
- weird scenario in which D is not subject to PJ in ANY STATE COURT
What is the test to determine if notice and service of process is constitutional?
Notice must be REASONABLE under the circumstances
What are the proper forms of service of process under the FRCP?
- whatever the STATE ALLOWS
- in hand PERSONAL delivery (you’ve been served)
- leaving summons at D’s DWELLING with a person of SUITABLE AGE AND DISCRETION
- delivery of summons to AUTHORIZED AGENT
- for ppl in foreign nations, service can be made by REGISTERED MAIL, return receipt requested
What is required for service of process on an infant?
service on infant AND ON PARENT/GUARDIAN
What is required for service of process on an adjudicated incompetent?
service on incompetent AND HER GUARDIAN
What is required for service of process on a corporation?
service on an:
- OFFICER
- DIRECTOR
- MANAGING AGENT, or
- APPOINTED AGENT
What is required for service of process on a non-resident motorist?
some states allowed service to be made on STATE OFFICIAL who then FORWARDS copy to D
What is required for service of process for in rem or quasi in rem actions?
- must first make a DILIGENT EFFORT to locate all claimants to property and serve them personally
- IF YOU CAN’T FIND THEM: notice by PUBLICATION is permitted
What does the question of venue address?
Whether this DISTRICT is a proper court to hear this action
Who is responsible for objecting to venue?
DEFENDANT!
When is an objection to improper venue waived?
Must be made at FIRST OPPORTUNITY (pre-answer motion or answer) or it is WAIVED
When is federal venue in a certain district proper?
Venue is proper in a district:
- where ANY DEFENDANT RESIDES, IF ALL Ds reside in SAME STATE
- where CLAIM AROSE
- if neither of the above, any district where D is subject to PERSONAL JURISDICTION is proper venue
NB: P’s residence is irrelevant!
For venue purposes, where is one’s residence?
Same as PJ!
individual = domicile
corporation = anywhere with PJ
What venue is proper in a case that began in state court and is removed?
Venue is automatically proper in the federal district where the STATE COURT SITS, even if that district would NOT BE PROPER ORIGINALLY!
When is transfer proper?
Transfer is only allowed to a district with PROPER VENUE, UNLESS ALL PARTIES AGREE to district without proper venue
What happens to a case brought in district without proper venue?
- may be DISMISSED, or
- transferred to a district with PROPER VENUE
Which law applies in a case that has been transferred?
if transferred from a district WITH PROPER VENUE, the law of the transferor (first) forum controls
if transferred from a district WITHOUT PROPER VENUE, the law of the transferee (second) forum controls
which law (federal or state) applies in a diversity action?
In a diversity case, a federal court applies STATE SUBSTANTIVE LAW and FEDERAL PROCEDURAL LAW (erie)
What is considered substantive law, and thus is governed by state law?
- rules that govern conduct
- i.e., what must be proved to win a case; defenses
- state STATUTES OF LIMITATION
- BURDENS OF PROOF
- CHOICE OF LAW rules
What is considered procedural, and thus is governed by federal law?
ANYTHING COVERED BY THE FRCP!
What does a federal court in diversity do when there are no federal statutes or rules on point?
If substantive –> state
if procedural –> federal
To determine, look at TWIN AIMS of Erie:
- avoid forum shopping
- avoid inequitable administration of justice
Meaning: if choice of PROCEDURE would be OUTCOME DETERMINATIVE, then apply STATE LAW
In a diversity action, what law governs rules relating to the role of the jury?
ALWAYS FEDERAL LAW, regardless of twin aims