civ pro Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

federal question jxn

A

exists when the claim arises under federal law, us constitution, or us treaty

P must be enforcing a federal right and must be present on the face of a well plead complaint

raising defense under fed law is not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

diversity jxn

A

requires complete diversity at time action is commenced and controversy exceeding $75k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

complete diversity citizenship requires

A

no p can be from same state as any D

citizenship is determined by domicile when action is commenced

  • natural person: residence and subj intent to make the state their permanent home
  • corp: dual citizenship at principal place of business and any state of incorporation
  • unincorp association: domiciled in state of every partner/member/owner
  • execut/personal rep: citizenship is that of decedent or person being represented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

> $75k controversy diversity jxn

A

based on damages alleged in good faith in complaint unless it is legally certain that P cannot recover amount

injunctive relief = the amount of the benefit to P or cost of compliance for D

may aggregate claims against one D or against multiple D if jointly and severally liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

supplemental jxn

A

allows party to bring state claim in federal court that does not meet requirements of SMJ where such additional claim arises from a common nucleus of operative fact (same t/o) as the other claim the court has SMJ over

limitations:

  • cannot be used to overcome lack of diversity
  • cannot be asserted if would violate complete diversity
  • does not apply to claims by OG P against third party D

court may decline supp jxn when

  • claim raises novel or complex issue of state law
  • claim sub predominates over other claims the court has SMJ over
  • court dismissed all claims that had federal SMJ or
  • exceptional circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

removal

A

D may remove case to fed court in the district court where the state court case was filed if

  1. fed court has SMJ
  2. all D agree
  3. No D is resident of forum state (if based on diversity jxn) AND
  4. removal is sought within 30 days of service of summons or receiving initial pleading justifying removal

P cannot remove to fed court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

personal jurisdiction requires

A

must have PJ over party based on traditional bases and long-arm jxn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

traditional basis of PJ

A

domicile, presence in state when served, consent or waiver (appearing without objection)

all comport with DP requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

long arm jxn non-resident

A

state must have long-arm statute and comply with constitutional DP requirements

D must have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state so as to not offend traditional notions of fair play and sub justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

minimum contacts PJ

A

contacts + relatedness
either:
1. gen jxn: contacts substantial and of such nature D is essentially at home (individuals = domicile or corp = where incorporated or PPB) or
2. specific: connection b/t forum state and underlying controversy and lawsuit arises from contact w/ forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

service of process timing

A

summons and complaint must be served on D within 90 days after filed with court

remedy for improper service: dismiss action without prejudice or order that service be made within specific time period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

service of process - method of service and who can receive

A

Process server - must be 18+ AND not a party to action

method: consistent with DP - reasonably calculated to make parties aware of action and give them opportunity to object.

individual - may be served personally, via someone of suitable age and discretion at individual current dwelling, via an agent, or in accordance with state law of forum state or where service is made

corporation - may be served in accordance with state law of forum state or where service is made or to an officer or managing/general/authorized agent

foreign corp: in accordance w/ foreign country law, as directed by foreign country after inquiry, by mail w/ signed receipt if address is known, or any means authorized by federal court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

proper venue

A

any district where

  1. any D resides (if all D reside in forum state)
  2. substantial portion of claim occurred
  3. substantial portion of property is located or
  4. if none of above, then where any D is subject to court PJ

*determined at the time action is filed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

transfer of venue

A

if venue was proper:
may transfer if needed for convenience of witness or interest or justice and the case could have been initially brought in the receiving court

if venue was improper:
the court must either dismiss the case or transfer to a proper court if interest of justice require

*forum selection clause are generally enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

erie doctrine

A

applies when fed case is brought under diversity jxn
federal courts apply substantive law of forum state but federal procedure law

procedure = civil procedure, statute of limitations, burden of proof, rebuttable presumptions

substantive = choice of law, SOF, irrebuttable presumptions, SOL that condition a substantive right or have a borrowing statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

preliminary injunction

A

maintains status quo until action is heard

may be issued only

  1. upon notice to adverse party and
  2. moving party gives security

4-prong test for issuance:

  1. success on merits
  2. threat of irreparable harm
  3. potential harm outweighs any harm to non-moving party and
  4. is in public interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

temporary restraining order

A

an emergency remedy used to maintain status quo pending outcome of preliminary injunction application. to be issued, movant must allege immediate and irreparable harm, and court will analyze the same factors as prelim injunction

ex parte TRO - moving party must

  1. provide specific facts in sworn affidavit showing immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or that damage will result before an adverse party can be heard
  2. certify in writing any efforts made to give notice to adverse party and why notice should not be required and
  3. give security in amount court deems proper (unless US, its officers, or agent)

automatically expires after 14 days unless the court sets shorter time frame, the court extends for good cause, or parties consent
**cannot be issued more than 28 days without becoming prelim injunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

amendment of pleading as matter of right

A

allowed to amend once as matter of course
• Within 21 days after service or
• within 21 days of service of responsive pleadings or pre-answer motion (rule 12)
• Opposition party has 14 days, or time remaining on 21-day deadline (whichever is longer) to respond to amended pleadings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

amendment of pleading without right

A

allowed with opposing party written consent or with leave of court upon motion (freely granted when justice requires)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

waived defenses

A

if not included in first response, these defenses are waived
lack of PJ, improper venue, insufficient process, insufficient service of process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

relation back doctrine

A

when complaint is amended to add
new claim –> related back to date of OG filing if arises out of same t/o as OG pleading allegations

new D –> relates back if

  1. same t/o
  2. new party received notice of OG action within 90 days of filing and
  3. new party knew or should have known that action would have been brought against them but for a mistake in party identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

counterclaims

A

permissive - counterclaims against opposing party that are not compulsory

compulsory - claim that arises out of same t/o and does not require adding another party out of court’s jxn (must be stated in party’s pleading or its barred in future litigation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

rule 11 - representations to the court

A

all papers served in litigation must be signed by an atty of record or by the party if unrepresented. when presenting the papers to court, the party certifies

  1. it is not being presented for any improper purpose
  2. the legal contentions are warranted and non-firvolous
  3. the factual contentions have evidentiary support or likely will after discover and
  4. denials of factual contentions are warranted or reasonably based on lack of information

rule 11 does not apply to discovery or discovery motions

24
Q

rule 11 sanctions imposed

A

the court may issue sanctions by motion or on its own for failure to comply with rule 11. nature of sanctions are within court discretion and includes non-monetary directives, pay penalty, or pay reasonably atty fee or expenses resulting from violation

liability: generally, law firm is jointly responsible for a violation by partner, associate, or employee
monetary sanctions cannot be issued against client for an unwarranted claim, defense, legal contention made by atty

25
Q

procedure for filing rule 11 sanction

A

a party cannot file rule 11 sanction motion without first

  1. serving the motion on the offending party and
  2. giving opponent 21 days to withdraw or correct the paper/pleading
26
Q

permissive joinder of parties

A

multiple plaintiffs or defendants may be joined in one action if

  1. joint and several relief is asserted by them or the claim arises out of same t/o
  2. common question of law or fact and
  3. SMJ is present for each claim

logical relationship test: all logically related events for legal action are within the meaning of same t/o

27
Q

mandatory joinder

A

party must be joined if

  1. the party is necessary to the action and
  2. joinder is feasible

a party is necessary if

  1. court cannot grant complete relief without the party
  2. the absent party claims an interest in the action that would be impaired or impeded or
  3. the party’s absence creates a substantial risk of multiple liability or inconsistent obligations

joinder is feasible if

  1. joinder will not remove SMJ and
  2. court has PJ over party

if joinder is not feasible, the court will consider factors to decide whether or not to dismiss the action: prejudice, ability to lessen prejudice, ability to issue adequate judgment, and if plaintiff would have remedy if the case is dismissed

28
Q

intervention as of right

A

a court must permit non-party to intervene in action if it demonstrates that:

interest in subject matter of the action and protection of this interest is not adequately represented by existing parties in the action or
statutory right of intervention

**joinder in diversity requires independent SMJ

29
Q

permissive intervention

A

court may allow non-party to intervene when the non-party

either (a) has a claim or defense that shares common question of law or fact with the main action or (b) is given conditional right to intervene by fed statute

**court must consider whether intervention will unduly delay or prejudice adjudication of the OG parties rights

30
Q

impleader

A

D may bring a third-party into action only if
third-party is or may be liable to D for all or part of the claim against D

**claims merely arising out of the same t/o are insufficient unless derivative liability exists - i.e., indemnity or contribution

court must have PJ over party and SMJ (gen will have supp jxn)

31
Q

class action requirements

A

a person is allowed to sue on behalf of a class when there is

  1. numerosity - class is so numerous that joinder is impractical
  2. commonality - questions of law or fact are common to the class
  3. typicality - the claims/defenses of representative parties are typical of the class AND
  4. adequacy of representation - the representative parties, incl. clounsel, will fairly and adequately protect interests of the class
32
Q

class action certification

A

if the requirements are met, the class will be certified if

  1. inconsistent/dispositive adjudications - separate actions would create risk of inconsistent adjudications or harm the interest of absent class members
  2. declaratory injunctive relief - the party opposing the class has acted/refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class so that the grounds for declaratory/injunctive relief are appropriate to the whole class or
  3. predominance and superiority - common questions of law or fact are predominant and a class action is superior to other methods
33
Q

discoverable information

A

a party may obtain all non-privilege information that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense AND proportional to the needs of the case

the info does not have to be admissible into evidence to be discoverable

once a person reasonably anticipates litigation, that person has duty to preserve all relevant evidence

34
Q

deposition rules

A

a party is permitted up to 10 depositions of any person/party, so long as deposition is

  1. limited to 1 day of no more than 7 hours AND
  2. proper notice is given (reasonable written notice)

subpoena is not required to depose any party in action

until stipulated otherwise, a party must obtain leave of court to

  1. take more than 10 depositions
  2. depose a party again, if already deposed in action or
  3. seeking deposition prior to the rule 26(f) meet and confer conference
35
Q

sanctions for failure to preserve ESI (electronically stored info)

A

the court may sanction party for failure to preserve ESI if

  1. ESI should have been preserved (reasonably anticipate litigation)
  2. the party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve and
  3. ESI cannot be replaced/restored through additional discovery

if satisfied, the court may

  1. order measures no greater than necessary to cure any prejudice or
  2. if failure to preserve was intentional: presume lost information was unfavorable, instruct jury that is may presume lost info was unfavorable, dismiss action, or enter default
36
Q

signing discovery document certifies that it is…

A
  1. consistent with FRCP and is not frivolous
  2. not being presented for improper purpose and
  3. not unreasonable, unduly burdensome, or unduly expensive

signing disclosure certifies that it is complete and correct at time it is made

37
Q

sanctions for improperly certifying discovery document

A

if a person violates the rule without substantial justification, the court must impose an appropriate sanction

38
Q

rule 26(a) initial disclosures

A

without request, each party must provide these initial disclosures to opposing parties within 14-days after 26(f) meet and confer conference:

  1. contact info of people likely to have discoverable information, plus the info they likely possess
  2. copy or description of all docs, ESI, and tangible items the party may use to support its claims/defenses unless it will be used solely for impeachment
  3. computation of each category of damages and
  4. any insurance agreement that may be liable to satisfy judgment in action

if the party fails to provide the info, that party is not allowed to use the info or witness not provided on motion, hearing, or trial unless the failure was substantially justified or harmless

39
Q

attorney work product doctrine

A

protects from disclosure all materials prepared by an attorney or his agents in anticipation of or during litigation unless

  1. substantial need for materials exists and
  2. substantial equivalent cannot be obtained without undue hardship
40
Q

privilege log

A

when a party claims work product protection, it must disclose the existence of the material in sufficient detail to enable other parties to asses the claim of privilege

41
Q

pretrail conference

A

the court may order attorneys and pro se parties to appear for pretrial conference to control management and scheduling of case

42
Q

scheduling order modification

A

can be modified only for good cause and with judge consent

43
Q

modification of pretrial conference order

A

can only be modified to prevent manifest injustice

44
Q

motion to dismiss standard

A

requires the court to consider facts in light most favorable to the non-moving party and determine if there is any basis upon which relief can be granted

can be based on SMJ, PJ, venue, process, service of process, failure to state a claim, failure to join necessary party

45
Q

motion for judgment on pleadings

A

after defendant answers, either party may move for motion for judgment on pleadings where complaint and answer show one party must win

46
Q

motion for summary judgment

A

a court will grant SJ when there is no genuine issue of material fact and movant is entitled to judgment as matter of law

the court views evidence most favorable to non-moving party
can be sought on the entire case or for certain issues (partial SJ)
if MTD presents matters outside of pleadings, the court may treat it as SJ motion

timing: before trial, no later than 30 days after close of discovery

47
Q

Motion for judgment as matter of law

A

timing: brought any time before the case is submitted to jury
standard: will be granted if non-moving party has been fully heard on the issue during a jury trial and the court finds that a reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient basis to rule in favor of the non-moving party on the issue

the court must draw all reasonable inference in favor of non-moving party

48
Q

renewal JMOL motion

A

timing: within 28 days of entry of judgment
standard: can only be renewed if it moved for JMOL before case was submitted for jury and can only be made on the same ground the original JMOL was made on

same standard as JMOL applies

49
Q

motion for new trial

A

timing: no later than 28 days after entry of judgment

court may grant new trial for any reason which new trial has been granted previously in fed court. court considers how much weight to give jury verdict and must find some serious error that occurred during trial

grounds for new trial:
error at trial that makes judgment unfair
new evidence surfaced that could not be obtained with due diligence for the OG trial
prejudicial misconduct of a party, attorney, third-party, or juror
verdict was excessive or inadequate

50
Q

motion for more definite statement

A

complaint so vague D cannot reasonably prepare response

51
Q

interrogatories

A

question to be answered in writing, under oath, limited to 25 questions including subparts (unless court order or stipulation) and must be answered within 30 days

only allowed to parties of the case

answer must be based on records reasonably available

52
Q

default judgment

A

a default judgment will have preclusive effect if court had jxn. states vary on preclusive effect, but state court must give JT in fed diversity same effect it would give state court. default JT bars party from asserting compulsory counterclaims that could have been raised in OG action

if D failed to appear –> the clerk may enter default for amount set in affidavit if claim is for certain sum

if D appeared but defaulted –> judge may enter default and additional notice is required

D can set aside DJT if there is good cause and viable defense

53
Q

claim preclusion (res judicata)

A

precludes a party from subsequently re-litigating any claim that was or could have been raised
elements:
1. parties are identical or in privity
2. prior judgment was rendered by court of competent jxn
3. final judgment on merits in prior action and
4. same claim was involved in both actions - claim arises out of same t/o

privity = exists when non-party has a legally recognized relationship w/ the OG party and would be bound by judgment against OG party

54
Q

issue preclusion - collateral estoppel

A

precludes party from attempting to retry an issue if there has been final judgment on merits by court of competent jxn

elements

  1. valid and final judgment on merits
  2. issue is identical to issue decided in prior action
  3. issue was actually litigated, determined, and essential to prior action and
  4. party against whom enforcement is sought had full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in prior action

generally, a non-party to prior action may assert issue preclusion

55
Q

final judgment rule appeals

A

a fed appeals court can only hear an appeal from final judgment on the merits unless an exception applies. final judgment is one which ends litigation on the merits (all claims are resolved) and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute judgment

appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of judgment

exceptions to rule:

  1. 54(b): immediate appeal is allowed when action has multiple parties or claims, court directs final judgment for some of claims or parties, AND court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay of appeal
  2. statutory exception: can immediately appeal orders for injunctions, receiverships, possession of property, liability in admiralty action, and patent infringement orders
  3. certified appeal: immediate appeal when fed district court judge certifies certain grounds for immediate appeal and the court of appeals agrees to permit the appeal (application must be made within 10 days of order)
  4. collateral order doctrine: allows immediate appeal if the interlocutory order conclusively determines disputed question, resolves an important issue that is separate from merits of action, and is effectively unreviewable on appeal from final judgment
  5. writ of mandamus & prohibition: immediate appeal if abuse of authority by trial court - cannot be used to correct ordinary error
  6. pendent appellate jxn: non-final order reviewable along with another appealable order currently pending before appellate court when a non-appealable decision is inextricably intertwined with an appealable decision or review of non-appealable order is necessary to ensure meaningful review of appealable order
  7. cert class action: order granting/denying class-action cert may be appealed when petition for permission to appeal is filed within 14 days after entry of order and court of appeals agrees to hear appeal
56
Q

expert witness disclosure

A

if intended to call the expert at trial, the opinion of the witness consulted is discoverable

if a witness is consulted in anticipation of litigation, but there is no intention to call them at trial, then the opinion is not discoverable unless there is a showing of exceptional needs

57
Q

voluntary dismissal

A

without leave of court:
Allowed before D serves a MSJ or answer
Dismissal is without prejudice provided this is the first time that P has dismissed her case; otherwise, it is dismissed w/ prejudice

with leave of court
Court has discretion to grant on terms and conditions deemed proper; Dismissal is without prejudice unless court states otherwise

Pending counterclaim – if D has filed counterclaim, P cannot voluntarily dismiss without D consent