Churchill’s Leadership Flashcards
What is the first factor?
- Churchill’s Political Diplomacy
What did Churchill change his political stance to and why was this important? (K)
- Churchill’s political stance constantly changed from Conservatives to the Lib Dem’s.
- Although many distrsuted him because of this, it was important as he had contacts with both parties which gained him an advantage on how he’d eventually form the national government as he would form a party he liked.
How did Churchill’s varying political stance cause him issues? (K)
- This caused him issues as Labour/Liberal refused to work with him, and he needed a united front against Germany.
- He promised 1/3 of the National Government and leading roles towards this group as a result.
What positions were given to the Liberal/Labour and how was this effective? (A)
- Sir Archibald Sinclair was Air minister and Clement Attlee was Deputy PM.
- This was effective as it provided a secure government towards Germany, as they united and focused what was important; winning the war effort, instead of letting feuds get in the way.
What do the traditionalists think about this argument? (H)
- R.Lamb describes Churchill’s move to include Labour/Liberal as ‘brilliant’ and it reveals his ‘acute political awareness.’
What is the counter-argument against Churchill’s political awareness? (K)
- Although Labour may have helped during the war, they used a stance of ‘Patrotic Undermining’, in response to the conservative abandonment of foreign and domestic policy for the war-effort, which overall made Churchill look worse.
Why did Churchill’s decision to include labour in the National Government backfire on him? (A)
- This shows that Churchill had a lack of political foresight in his diplomacy as this decision backfired and made his image look bad towards the British public, as he may have been a good war-leader, but he didn’t care about the public’s issues throughout the war.
What do the revisionists say about the first factor?
- Addison agrees with this position saying: “While Churchill’s thoughts were elsewhere, they [Labour] were busy changing the agenda.”
What is the overall conclusion to the first factor? (E)
- However, although the Labour Party may have taken advantage of their position to criticise the Conservatives,
- it cannot be ignored that Churchill was an effective war-time leader as he brought the national government together and work together, which no other MP was capable of.
What is the second factor?
- Churchill’s ego/personality and how it contributes to his leadership
What did Churchill have that was a disadvantage? (K)
- Churchill had a very high ego and was willing to take part in any risky scheme during the “phoney war” period when he had little knowledge of war tactics.
- Field Marshall Alan Brooke agrees to this he had to control Churchill’s “passion for premature offensives”.
What did Churchill attempt to force Hugh Dowding to do?
- Churchill tried to force Hugh Dowding to send more land-fighters despite the high RAF casualty rate and pressure from the Luftwaffe, but he refused to do so and he properly defended the isle during the Battle, hindering Germany plans.
- 10th-30th of May, RAF lost 100 planes.
What did Churchill do as a result of Hugh Dowding disobeying him?
- Churchill removed Hugh Dowding as Head of Fighter Command, prolonging the war due to personal issues, which shows that Churchill’s personality was harmful to Britain as he held grudges and had to be held back by them.
What is the counter-argument towards the second factor?
- Although he may have been impulsive, his oratory was unmatched as it influenced people in power, shown as John F Kennedy said “He mobilised the English language and sent it into battle.”
How did Churchill also influence the public? (K/A)
- He also influenced the public by the 14th of July speech in 1940, declaring that Britain would fight alone, 2/3 of the adult population tuned in.
- This is important as many people resonated with the courage to push on and fight Germany, when it looked impossible to win, which no other person could have done solely.