Christianity 2a Flashcards

1
Q

What is the spec content

A

nowledge and understanding of religion and belief

Religious concepts - the nature of God: Is God male?

The issue of male language about God;

the pastoral benefits and challenges of the model of Father;

Sallie McFague and God as mother.

Can God suffer?

The impassibility of God;

the modern view of a suffering God illustrated by Jurgen Moltmann (The Crucified God).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

God as Father
In the new testament, the concept God as Father combined two separate ideas what are they

A

God as Creator of the world - involving a sense of Lordship (John 1:3 implies Jesus was creator as well)/

The relationship between God and Jesus - when Jesus referred to God as his Father, he used the intimate term ‘Abba’ best translated ‘Daddy’ - and encouraged his followers to do the same. This emphasised a personal and loving relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

There are several passages in the old and new testament that portray God in female terms how much if the terms can u remember

A

Can a mother forget the baby at her breast and have no compassion on the child she has borne? Though she may forget, I will not forget you. (Isaiah 49:15)

As a mother comforts her child, so will I comfort you (Isaiah 66:13)

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing. (Matthew 23:37)

Or suppose a woman has ten silver coins and loses one. Doesn’t she light a lamp, sweep the house and search carefully until she finds it? And when she finds it, she calls her friends and neighbours together and says, “Rejoice with me; I have found my lost coin.” 10 In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.’ (Luke 15:8-10)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Other passages clearly urge caution in our imagery

A

God is spirit, and his worshippers must worship in the Spirit and in truth, (John 4:24)

So, God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them;

male and female he created them. (Genesis 1:27)

There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you

Christ Jesus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sally mc fugue is a

A

Eco feminist theologian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sally mc fague wrote

A

Metaphorical theology models of God in religious language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sally argues all language about God is

A

Metaphorical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sally says that metaphors can easily turn into

A

Idols

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why all metaphors limited

A

They all become outdated as culture changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sally believes that metaphors hold what power

A

To shape how we view life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What specification did Sally say we should meet when choosing metaphors we are using

A

According to the Times and situations we live in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the example of everest

A

First scaling of Mount everest was called conquest of everest in the west where as the east wrote the befriending of everest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is meant by the everest example

A

The tone of language is so markedly different and reflects and fosters very different attitudes to the environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sally says metaphors are essential for theology because

A

God is beyond our language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Metaphors are not what or what

A

True or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Metaphors should do what

A

Startle and capture our attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How have metaphors turned into models

A

Become established models by reminding ubiquitous though consistent use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Mcfague see this approach to be between fundamentalism and deconstructionism what does that mean

A

There is only a metaphor that can stir a middle path

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does Sally argue that we are living

A

Where everything is increasingly seen as inter-related. Word used in different areas of study ae connected. Decision-making is moving away from treating everything as “things’

In a nuclear age. We have reached a point in history where we can wipe out birth. We can kill nature. This is a scary world and the threat of nuclear war/disaster is still here.

In an age of worn-out metaphors. She insists that we need anti-hierarchical metaphors today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the central metaphor of Christianity as argues by Sally

A

Triumphalist, monarchal and patriarchal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Metaphors are unhelpful in a world facing

A

Disaster and misuses of power over the weak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What kind if mentality does Sally say metaphors breed

A

Escapism and militarism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is escapism defined by sally

A

Hoping God will save us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is militarism defined by sally

A

Give up or conquer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is sallys first point

A

There is the problem of God as father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Sally does not dislike father as much but rejects

A

Almighty father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Why does Sally reject almighty father

A

Makes father powerful patriarchal judgemental and a figure of authority rather than playful and kind (abba)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Mcfague argues that the patriarchal form is a form if

A

Idolatry in the light if genesis 1:27 I which God is referred to as both male and female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Central metaphor of Christianity?

A

Triumphalist, monarchical, patriarchal (according to McFague)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

McFague’s critique of “Almighty Father”?

A

Patriarchal, judgmental, distant, unapproachable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Difference between “female” and “feminine”?

A

Female is not the same as feminine; feminine is culturally determined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Attributes of God as a mother according to McFague?

A

Caring for all life, self-giving love, love for all creation

33
Q

McFague’s argument for portraying God as a mother in the nuclear age?

A

Reflects a nurturing, life-giving role needed in a time of crisis

34
Q

Reason for changing metaphors of God, according to McFague?

A

Traditional metaphors reinforce patriarchal structures and societal stereotypes

35
Q

McFague’s suggested metaphors for God?

A

Mother (creation), Lover (salvation), Friend (eschatology)

36
Q

Problems identified with using male metaphors for God?

A

Patriarchy, domination of women, abuse of the natural world

37
Q

What belief does McFague’s panentheism entail?

A

Creation is the visible part of God; God is in everything

38
Q

How does McFague extend the metaphor of God’s maternal nature?

A

Giving birth, nursing, comforting, caring

39
Q

Limitations of maternal imagery according to McFague?

A

Caution against sentimentality; focus on basic maternal actions rather than societal expectations

40
Q

Reactions to McFague’s new metaphors?

A

Some find them accessible and useful, others object based on biblical tradition and Jesus’s promotion of established terms for God.

41
Q

Three good arguments for viewing God in traditional male-centric language?

A
  1. Reflects historical tradition and biblical language. 2. Provides a familiar and unifying framework for worship. 3. Maintains theological consistency with the image of God as Father.
42
Q

Three good arguments for viewing God in non-traditional female-centric language?

A
  1. Challenges patriarchal language and promotes gender equality. 2. Offers inclusive language that resonates with diverse worshippers. 3. Provides a fresh perspective on the divine that reflects contemporary values.
43
Q

Gender-neutral version of the Lord’s Prayer excerpt?

A

Eternal Spirit, Earth-Walker, Pain-bearer, Life-giver, Source of all that is and all that shall be, Father and Mother of us all…

44
Q

Traditional male-centric version of the Lord’s Prayer excerpt?

A

Our Father, which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy Name…

45
Q

Female-centric version of the Lord’s Prayer excerpt?

A

Our Mother, which art at the earth, Nurturing are thy ways…

46
Q

Definition of impassible?

A

Unable to suffer or experience emotion, particularly in the context of God’s divine nature.

47
Q

Definition of immutable?

A

Unchanging, particularly in reference to God’s perfect and transcendent nature.

48
Q

Key points of the traditional Christian view on God’s impassibility and immutability?

A

God is considered incapable of suffering or emotion (impassible) and unchanging (immutable) due to His perfection, omnipotence, omniscience, and transcendent nature.

49
Q

Challenge to the traditional view of God’s impassibility and immutability?

A

The belief that in the face of human suffering and atrocities, it is unacceptable to view God as immune from suffering and emotional change, arguing instead for a passible God who suffers alongside humanity.

50
Q

Key ideas from Jürgen Moltmann’s theology of hope?

A

God suffers with humanity, and humanity is promised a better future based on resurrection.

51
Q

Significance of the cross according to Moltmann?

A

The cross is an event in the life of God, representing suffering and death as central to Christian theology.

52
Q

Problem identified by Moltmann regarding the traditional view of God’s impassibility?

A

The crucifixion becomes insignificant or God appears uncaring in the face of human suffering.

53
Q

Solution proposed by Moltmann?

A

Emphasizing the significance of Christ’s death on the cross as a means to address the problem of an impassible God.

54
Q

Difference between Moltmann’s theology and human/philosophical labels for God?

A

Moltmann insists that human or philosophical labels like ruler or moral force do not capture the essence of the Christian God, which is relevant to a suffering world and open to dialogue with atheists.

55
Q

Moltmann’s understanding of the cross from a Trinitarian perspective?

A

The Son suffers and dies on the cross, experiencing rejection, while the Father experiences bereavement and loss, emphasizing the unity and suffering within the Trinity.

56
Q

Significance of Jesus’ cry from the cross according to Moltmann?

A

It reflects the extreme separation within the Trinity as well as the ultimate unity through surrender, highlighting the depth of God’s involvement in human suffering.

57
Q

How does Moltmann view the cross as a symbol?

A

The cross symbolizes God’s solidarity with the suffering and powerless, emphasizing the importance of identifying with the crucified Christ and expressing solidarity with the marginalized.

58
Q

Critique of the Church’s historical interpretation of the cross according to Moltmann?

A

The Church has stripped the cross of its true meaning by over-emphasizing the sacrifice of Jesus, turning it into a private and spiritualized matter rather than a call to political action and liberation.

59
Q

Moltmann’s resolution to protest atheism?

A

Moltmann argues that protest atheism is resolved in the cross, where God himself protested against suffering by experiencing it in the death of the forsaken

60
Q

Moltmann’s emphasis regarding Christians’ involvement in the world?

A

Active engagement in political causes on behalf of the poor and oppressed, prioritizing involvement over passivity.

61
Q

Story of Elie Wiesel’s experience in the Nazi death camp?

A

Wiesel witnessed the hanging of a young boy in the camp, prompting him to question the presence of God in such suffering, with the conclusion that God was hanging on the gallows alongside the innocent victims.

62
Q

Connection between Elie Wiesel’s story and Moltmann’s views?

A

Both emphasize the concept of a suffering God who identifies with human suffering and is present in the midst of tragedy and injustice.

63
Q

Moltmann’s perspective on spirituality and involvement?

A

Rejects passivity and emphasizes active involvement in the world, advocating for political action and engagement with societal issues.

64
Q

Key concept of committing to the crucified God according to Moltmann?

A

Involves accepting a lack of success, being open to suffering and failure, and actively working towards justice and liberation in the world.

65
Q

Relationship between the cross and politics according to Moltmann?

A

Moltmann argues for a move from viewing the crucifixion as a purely private and spiritual matter to embracing a political theology that calls Christians to action on behalf of the marginalized and oppressed.

66
Q

Significance of Moltmann’s book “The Crucified God” in the story of the martyred priests in El Salvador?

A

The book fell into the blood of one of the priests, symbolizing their embodiment of the beliefs expressed in Moltmann’s theology through their martyrdom and sacrifice.

67
Q

Validity of referring to God as ‘Mother’?

A

Controversial for some but helpful for many Christians, gaining increasing validity, with arguments against it not necessarily strong enough to resist the challenge of God as Mother.

68
Q

Main challenge to the traditional model of God as Father?

A

Questioning why all characteristics of God are seen as belonging to the male gender, especially in a patriarchal context.

69
Q

Biblical support for referring to God in feminine terms?

A

Includes personifications of God’s Wisdom as a woman (Proverbs 8) and descriptions of God’s nurturing and comforting attributes.

70
Q

Argument against the concept of God as Mother?

A

Suspected association with ancient Near Eastern cults of the mother-goddess giving birth to the earth, but this does not necessarily invalidate the concept for contemporary Christianity.

71
Q

Conclusion regarding the validity of referring to God as Mother?

A

While controversial and met with some resistance, the concept of God as Mother has proved helpful to many Christians and is gaining acceptance in Christian circles, suggesting that the model of God as Father alone may be inadequate today.

72
Q

Argument against the concept of a suffering God?

A

Some argue that God cannot suffer, as impassibility is considered an attribute of God alongside omniscience and omnipotence, suggesting that God is above human suffering and emotion.

73
Q

Theological implications of a passible God?

A

Accused of panentheism, making God part of the natural world and questioning God’s omnipotence and omnibenevolence if He is subject to suffering.

74
Q

Biblical evidence for a passible God?

A

Old Testament references to God responding to events with compassion or anger, and New Testament portrayals of Jesus experiencing emotions such as pain, mercy, and anger.

75
Q

Rebuttal to the argument for a passible God?

A

Some argue that while Jesus experienced suffering and emotions, this does not affect the impassibility of God’s divine nature, as Jesus is both fully human and fully divine.

76
Q

Moltmann’s perspective on the suffering of God?

A

Moltmann argues that God’s ability to experience suffering and emotions is essential for His omniscience and that Christian hope is based on the resurrection, which acknowledges the pain of the negative.

77
Q

Concerns regarding the concept of God’s passibility?

A

Raises questions about whether human understanding of emotions equates to God’s, and proposes the idea of God being empathetic rather than experiencing suffering directly.

78
Q

Potential resolution to the debate on God’s impassibility?

A

Proposes that while God understands and shares the suffering of others, He does not have ownership of the experience itself, suggesting a way to reconcile traditional views of God’s impassibility with modern theological discussions.