Chp. 1 Introduction to Microbiology, scientists Flashcards
What are Koch’s postulates?
25
What was the significance of the swan neck flask in Pasteur’s experimets?
a
What is a prion? What diseases are caused by prions?
a
Prokaryote
1 Cell
Bacteria
Archae
Eukaryote
1 cell or muticellular, “animal like”
Protozoa-
Algae
Helminths
Bacillus
rodlike
Coccus
spherical or ovoid
Spiral
corkscrew or curved
Peptidoglycan
Bacteria are enclosed in cell walls that are largely composed of a carbohydrate and protein complex
Binary Fission
Bacteria generally reproduce by dividing into two equal cells
Robert Hooke - 1665
After observing a thin slice of cork through a relatively crude microscope, Englishman Hooke, reported to the world that life’s smallest structural units were “little boxes,” or “cells,” as he called them. Using his improved version of a compound microscope (one that uses two sets of lenses), Hooke was able to see individual cells. Hooke’s discovery marked the beginning of CELL THEORY–the theory that all living things are composed of cells. Subsequent investigations into the structure and function of cells were based on this theory.
Anton van Leeuwenhoek - 1673-1723
Though Hooke’s microscope was capable of showing large cells, it lacked the resolution that would have allowed him to see microbes clearly. The Dutch merchant and amateur scientist, was probably the first actually to observe live microorganisms through the magnifying lenses of more than 400 microscopes he constructed. Between 1673-1723, he wrote a eries of letters to the Royal Society of London describing the “animalcules” he saw through his simple, single lens microscope. Van Leeuwenhoek made detailed drawings of “animalcules” he found in rainwater, in his own feces, and in material scraped from his teeth. These drawings have been identified as representations of bacteria and protozoa.
Spontaneous Generation
After van Leeuwenhoek discovered the previously “invisible” world of microorganisms, the scientific community of the time became interested in the origins of these tiny living things. Until the second half of the nineteenth century, many scientists and philosophers believed that some forms of life could arise spontaneously from nonliving matter; Not much more than 100 years ago, people commonly believed that toads, snakes, and mice could be born of moist soil; that flies could emerge from manure; and that maggots (which we now know are the larvae of flies) could arise from decaying corpses.
Francesco Redi - 1668
A strong opponent of spontaneous generation, Redi set out in 1668 to demonstrate that maggots did not arise from decaying meat. Redi filled two jars with decaying meat. The first was left unsealed; the flies laid their eggs on the meat, and the eggs developed into larvae. The second jar was sealed, and because the flies could not lay their eggs on the meat, no maggots appeared. Still, Redi’s antagonists were not convinced; they claimed that fresh air was needed for spontaneous generation. So Redi set up a second experiment, in which he covered a jar with a fine net instead of sealing it. No larvae appeared in the gauze-covered jar, even though air was present. Maggots appeared only when flies were allowed to leave their eggs on the meat. Redi’s results were a serious blow to the long-held belief that large forms of life could arise from nonlife. However, many scientists still believed that small organisms, such as van Leeuwenhoek’s “animalcules” were simple enough to be generated from nonliving materials.
John Needham - 1745
The case for spontaneous generation of microorganisms seemed to be strengthened in 1745, when Needham, an Englishman, found that even after he heated nutrient fluids (chicken broth and corn broth) before pouring them into covered flasks, the cooled solutions were soon teeming with microorganisms. Needham claimed that microbes developed spontaneously from the fluids.